Skip to content

Prevention of Incisional Hernia With an Onlay Mesh Visible on MRI

Multicenter Study on Prevention of Incisional Hernia After Laparotomy With an Onlay Mesh Visible on MRI

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03105895
Acronym
VISIBLE
Enrollment
200
Registered
2017-04-10
Start date
2017-09-01
Completion date
2030-12-01
Last updated
2026-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Incisional Hernia

Keywords

Incisional hernia, Mesh prevention, Mesh augmentation

Brief summary

It has been demonstrated that incisional hernia incidence after laparotomy can be safely reduced with the addition of a mesh to the conventional closure of the abdominal wall. There still some debate about which is the best position to place this mesh: onlay or sublay. In Europe we have now meshes with CEE approval to be used as reinforcement of abdominal wall closure. The investigators have planned to include 200 patients in a multi center study using an onlay PDVF mesh that can be tracked by magnetic resonance. The patients included will be patients with risk factors for the development of an incisional hernia. The incidence of incisional hernia will be assessed clinically and radiologically after 1 and 2 years follow-up. The incidence of surgical sites occurrences and pain will be also assessed.

Interventions

PROCEDUREMesh group

An onlay PDVF mesh will be placed as abdominal wall reinforcement

Sponsors

Henares University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER
CARDIOLINK
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Any known risk factor for development of incisional hernia * \> 60 years * BMI \> 30 * DM * Chronic bronquitis * Smoking * Neoplasia * Renal failure * Liver failure * Immnusupression * Urgent or emergency operation

Exclusion criteria

* Previous supraumbilical midline laparotomy * Previous incisional hernia * Life expectancy of less than 12 months * Patient´s rejection to participate * Unable to understand and participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incisional Hernia24 monthsDevelopment of an incisional hernia diagnosed clinically or radiologically

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Surgical site infection30 daysWound infection according to CDC guidelines
Surgical site seroma30 daysSeroma ocurrence in the wound
Surgical site hematoma30 daysHematoma occurrence in the wound
Mesh exposition30 daysMesh that can be seen during postoperative recovery without skin covarage
Evisceration30 daysPostoperative wound dehiscence
Systemic complications30 daysAny systemic complication occurred in the postoperative period
Chronic mesh infectionup to 2 years postoperativeMesh chronically infected that need removal to solve
Abdominal wall painUp to 2 yearsVAS score in the follow-up
Length of mesh at MRI 6 weeks6 weeksLength of the mesh calculated at the MRI planned at 6 weeks
Width of mesh at MRI 6 weeks6 weeksWidth of the mesh calculated at the MRI planned at 6 weeks
Length of mesh at MRI 1 year1 yearLength of the mesh calculated at the MRI planned at 1 year
Width of mesh at MRI 1 year1 yearWidth of the mesh calculated at the MRI planned at 1 year

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 20, 2026