Skip to content

Evaluation of Readability of Consent Forms on the Understanding of the Information Received by Volunteers

Evaluation of the Readability of Information and Consent Forms on the Understanding of the Information Received by Participants in Biomedical Research

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03105752
Enrollment
240
Registered
2017-04-10
Start date
2014-04-30
Completion date
2016-04-30
Last updated
2017-04-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Comprehension, Language, Outcome Assessments (Health Care)

Keywords

Outcome Assessments (Health Care), Volunteers, Informed consent, Comprehension, Language tests

Brief summary

Prior to the completion of biomedical research, any person undergoing it must receive a readable and intelligible information about this research, in order to give free and informed consent. The willingness to inform patients of all risks and constraints related to research may be in contradiction with the need to write informative and concise documents that are understandable to research participants. As a result, consent forms are long, contain a lot of information and are complicated to understand. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of the readability of the information and consent forms on the understanding of the information received by participants in clinical trials.

Interventions

OTHERQuestionnaire of understanding

The study involved 12 clinical trials conducted in the Clinical Research Center Paris Est. Twenty participants per trial were offered to answer the Qualité de Compréhension des Formulaires d'information et de consentement questionnaire (QCFic) at the inclusion visit after receiving the information by the investigator and signed or refused to sign the form of consent. Participants filled out the questionnaire in an isolated location, with no possibility of re-reading the information contained in the consent form. The questionnaire was immediately retrieved.

Sponsors

Groupe Hospitalier Pitie-Salpetriere
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Every volunteers included in a study in a french clinical research center * Ability to read and write in French

Exclusion criteria

* Refusal of participation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Correlation between the overall comprehension score and the readability index of FleschImmediate evaluation

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Correlation between the overall comprehension score and the level of educationImmediate evaluation
Correlation between the overall comprehension score and the status of volunteerImmediate evaluation
Correlation between the overall comprehension score and the type of studyImmediate evaluation

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026