Skip to content

Low Frequency TMS for Depression in Epilepsy

Safety and Feasibility of Accelerated Low-Frequency Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Medication-Resistant Depression in Patients With Epilepsy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03105700
Acronym
LFTMS
Enrollment
15
Registered
2017-04-10
Start date
2017-04-01
Completion date
2021-11-15
Last updated
2023-03-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depressions, Refractory, Epilepsy

Keywords

epilepsy, depression, refractory, TMS

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is safe and feasible for treating depressive symptoms in patients with epilepsy. Patients will receive an accelerated protocol of TMS consisting of three consecutive days of treatment. Patients will have in-person follow up visits after one month and again after six months.

Detailed description

This is a pilot study designed primarily to assess whether patients with epilepsy can safely tolerate low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation in an accelerated protocol to treat depression. The investigators aim to treat 12 patients with epilepsy and comorbid depression to receive a total of 15 hours of transcranial magnetic stimulation over 3 days at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center (DHMC). The investigators will assess safety of this protocol with regards to seizure frequency and other side effects of TMS treatment and the feasibility of using an accelerated protocol in this patient population. In addition to these primary aims, our secondary goal is to determine if dense array EEG can provide a useful biomarker for depression and its treatment in focal epilepsy. A structural and functional MRI will be obtained before treatment and a dense array EEG before and after TMS treatment to assess for changes in specific dense array EEG based biomarkers. In addition to recruiting patients, the study staff will likewise request that family members or friends of the patient accompany the patient monitor him/her for increased seizure frequency. The recruited family member will bring the patient to the treatment and stay with the patient overnight at a local hotel and monitor for possible seizures or other adverse events of treatment. Family members will be instructed in seizure safety and be given emergency phone numbers to call if the patient is experiencing adverse effects of TMS.

Interventions

DEVICETranscranial Magnetic Stimulation

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a focal, nonpharmacological, noninvasive method for stimulating the brain and modulating neural network activity. To administer TMS, an electromagnetic coil is placed on the scalp, and uses electrical current to create magnetic fields that depolarize or hyperpolarize neurons in the brain.

Sponsors

The Diamond Foundation Inc.
CollaboratorOTHER
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 or older * Able and willing to provide informed consent. * Diagnosis of epilepsy confirmed by the study neurologist (KB). * English-speaking * Not pregnant * Able to safely undergo MRI (as assessed by MRI safety form). * Have a family member or friend (proxy) who will be able to bring the patient to the hospital and serve as a safety monitor during stay in study hotel for two consecutive nights. * Patients on stable doses of current antiepileptic and antidepressant medications for 1 month.

Exclusion criteria

* Significant cognitive impairment measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) \<23. * History of other major psychiatric disorders (e.g., schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, substance use disorder (except caffeine and nicotine) or presence of unstable medical comorbidities. * Actively/imminently suicidal (QIDS item 12 score \> 2 or Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) Suicidality module score \> 16) * Greater than 10 seizures per week during 1 month prior. * History of stroke, moderate-severe traumatic brain injury or other major neurological disorder. * Any magnetic or implanted device that will interfere with ability to safely receive MRI and/or TMS treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Seizure Frequency Expressed as the Average Number of Seizures Experienced by All Participants and Recorded at Specified Time Points Throughout the Study.Baseline, 1-week post-treatment, 1-month post-treatment, 6-month post-treatment follow-upThe hypothesis is that TMS treatment will not produce serious adverse events defined as an increase in the average number of seizures across all participants. This data is collected from the time of enrollment, and then at baseline, 1-week post treatment, 1-month post-treatment, and 6-month post treatment. The seizures are reported directly by the participants during check-ins with the research staff at the study specified study timepoints.
Percentage of Participants Who Complete the TMS Treatment15 one-hour sessions of TMS over 3 daysThe percentage of participants who completed the TMS treatment as measured by the total number of participants (expressed as percentage) who completed 15-hour sessions of TMS over 3 days.
Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events as Measured by a Modified Systematic Assessment for Treatment Emergent Events (SAFTEE).Day 1, 2, and 3 of TMS treatmentThe hypothesis is that TMS treatment will not be associated with a higher rate of adverse events as measured by a modified Systematic Assessment for Treatment Emergent Events (SAFTEE) given pre-TMS treatment and immediately post-TMS sessions. SAFTEE is a tool used to assess participants' adverse events and is presented to all participants before and right after each TMS session. The outcome is expressed as a total number of adverse events across all participants and all TMS treatment sessions.
Measuring Biomarker for Depression Using Dense-array EEGBaseline, Post-TMS, 1-month and 6-month follow-upExamine the utility of dense-array electroencephalogram (EEG) as a biological marker (biomarker) of depression and response to treatment with low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in patients with Epilepsy. The ratio of alpha power between the right and the left hemispheres is considered an EEG based biomarker for depression. It is obtained by dividing alpha power from the right brain hemisphere divided by alpha power measured from the left brain hemisphere. A ratio higher than 1 (1 infers that both sides of the brain are equal) correlates with depression.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Depression Severity Related to the Study Interventions.1-week post-treatment, 1-month post-treatment, 3-month post-treatment, and 6-month post-treatment follow-upExploratory analyses will investigate changes in depression scores as a result of the study protocol and interventions. Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomology (QIDS) is a self-assessment questionnaire used in this study to measure participants' depression symptoms. For Major Depressive Disorder scores of 0-5 indicate no depression, 6-10 indicates mild depression, 11-15 is moderate depression, 16-20 is severe depression, and 21-27 is very severe depression.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Low Frequency TMS Intervention
Patients will receive low-frequency TMS on an accelerated schedule over three consecutive days. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a focal, nonpharmacological, noninvasive method for stimulating the brain and modulating neural network activity. To administer TMS, an electromagnetic coil is placed on the scalp, and uses electrical current to create magnetic fields that depolarize or hyperpolarize neurons in the brain.
15
Total15

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up4
Overall Studyscreen fail3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLow Frequency TMS Intervention
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
12 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Seizure Frequency Expressed as the Average Number of Seizures Experienced by All Participants and Recorded at Specified Time Points Throughout the Study.

The hypothesis is that TMS treatment will not produce serious adverse events defined as an increase in the average number of seizures across all participants. This data is collected from the time of enrollment, and then at baseline, 1-week post treatment, 1-month post-treatment, and 6-month post treatment. The seizures are reported directly by the participants during check-ins with the research staff at the study specified study timepoints.

Time frame: Baseline, 1-week post-treatment, 1-month post-treatment, 6-month post-treatment follow-up

Population: Subjects 3 and14 were lost to 6-month follow-up for unknown reasons. Subjects 9 and 13 were lost to 6-month follow-up due to COVID 19.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low Frequency TMS InterventionChange in Seizure Frequency Expressed as the Average Number of Seizures Experienced by All Participants and Recorded at Specified Time Points Throughout the Study.Baseline5.83 average number of seizures
Low Frequency TMS InterventionChange in Seizure Frequency Expressed as the Average Number of Seizures Experienced by All Participants and Recorded at Specified Time Points Throughout the Study.1-week post-treatment0 average number of seizures
Low Frequency TMS InterventionChange in Seizure Frequency Expressed as the Average Number of Seizures Experienced by All Participants and Recorded at Specified Time Points Throughout the Study.1-month post-treatment1.42 average number of seizures
Low Frequency TMS InterventionChange in Seizure Frequency Expressed as the Average Number of Seizures Experienced by All Participants and Recorded at Specified Time Points Throughout the Study.6-month post-treatment1.0 average number of seizures
Primary

Measuring Biomarker for Depression Using Dense-array EEG

Examine the utility of dense-array electroencephalogram (EEG) as a biological marker (biomarker) of depression and response to treatment with low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in patients with Epilepsy. The ratio of alpha power between the right and the left hemispheres is considered an EEG based biomarker for depression. It is obtained by dividing alpha power from the right brain hemisphere divided by alpha power measured from the left brain hemisphere. A ratio higher than 1 (1 infers that both sides of the brain are equal) correlates with depression.

Time frame: Baseline, Post-TMS, 1-month and 6-month follow-up

Population: Subject 1: post-TMS HD-EEG data file is not retrievable. Subject 3 and 4: baseline and post-TMS data were too noisy for analysis in frequency domain, and therefore, were excluded from the following analysis.~6-month follow-up: was not collected for this outcome measure due to COVID-19 pandemic

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Low Frequency TMS InterventionMeasuring Biomarker for Depression Using Dense-array EEGBaseline alpha power asymmetry1.29 frontal alpha power ratio R/LStandard Deviation 0.88
Low Frequency TMS InterventionMeasuring Biomarker for Depression Using Dense-array EEGPost-TMS alpha power asymmetry1.10 frontal alpha power ratio R/LStandard Deviation 0.21
Low Frequency TMS InterventionMeasuring Biomarker for Depression Using Dense-array EEG1-Month Follow-up alpha power asymmetry1.35 frontal alpha power ratio R/LStandard Deviation 0.53
Primary

Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events as Measured by a Modified Systematic Assessment for Treatment Emergent Events (SAFTEE).

The hypothesis is that TMS treatment will not be associated with a higher rate of adverse events as measured by a modified Systematic Assessment for Treatment Emergent Events (SAFTEE) given pre-TMS treatment and immediately post-TMS sessions. SAFTEE is a tool used to assess participants' adverse events and is presented to all participants before and right after each TMS session. The outcome is expressed as a total number of adverse events across all participants and all TMS treatment sessions.

Time frame: Day 1, 2, and 3 of TMS treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Low Frequency TMS InterventionNumber of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events as Measured by a Modified Systematic Assessment for Treatment Emergent Events (SAFTEE).1 adverse events
Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Complete the TMS Treatment

The percentage of participants who completed the TMS treatment as measured by the total number of participants (expressed as percentage) who completed 15-hour sessions of TMS over 3 days.

Time frame: 15 one-hour sessions of TMS over 3 days

Population: Participants who started the TMS treatment and completed all sessions

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Low Frequency TMS InterventionPercentage of Participants Who Complete the TMS Treatment12 Participants
Secondary

Changes in Depression Severity Related to the Study Interventions.

Exploratory analyses will investigate changes in depression scores as a result of the study protocol and interventions. Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomology (QIDS) is a self-assessment questionnaire used in this study to measure participants' depression symptoms. For Major Depressive Disorder scores of 0-5 indicate no depression, 6-10 indicates mild depression, 11-15 is moderate depression, 16-20 is severe depression, and 21-27 is very severe depression.

Time frame: 1-week post-treatment, 1-month post-treatment, 3-month post-treatment, and 6-month post-treatment follow-up

Population: 3-month follow-up: subjects 1 \& 2: data not available as this was not in the protocol at the time 6-month follow-up: subjects 3, 9, 13, 14: lost to follow-up, no data available for analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low Frequency TMS InterventionChanges in Depression Severity Related to the Study Interventions.Screening Visit16.9 score on a scale
Low Frequency TMS InterventionChanges in Depression Severity Related to the Study Interventions.1-week post treatment8.2 score on a scale
Low Frequency TMS InterventionChanges in Depression Severity Related to the Study Interventions.1-month post treatment8.7 score on a scale
Low Frequency TMS InterventionChanges in Depression Severity Related to the Study Interventions.3-month post-treatment8.8 score on a scale
Low Frequency TMS InterventionChanges in Depression Severity Related to the Study Interventions.6-month post-treatment9.6 score on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026