Skip to content

Intravenous and Intraperitoneal Lignocaine for Perioperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Colon Resections

Intravenous and Intraperitoneal Lignocaine for Perioperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Colon Resections

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03105193
Enrollment
60
Registered
2017-04-07
Start date
2018-08-17
Completion date
2019-12-30
Last updated
2020-11-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Laparoscopic Colon Resection, Perioperative Analgesia

Keywords

Colon surgery, Lignocaine, Lidocaine, Analgesia, Local anaesthetic

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to investigate the analgesic effects of intraperitoneal lignocaine (IPL) compared with intravenous lignocaine (IVL) after laparoscopic colon resections. We plan to run a 2 group randomized, double blind, clinical trial which will look into morphine consumption as the primary outcome. Group 1 (IV lignocaine)- IV bolus of lignocaine and a 3 day post operative IV lignocaine infusion. Intra peritoneal (IP) bolus of normal saline + 3 day post operative IP normal saline infusion Group 2 (IP lignocaine)- IV bolus of normal saline and a 3 day post operative IV normal saline infusion. IP bolus of lignocaine + 3 day post operative IP lignocaine infusion

Detailed description

Over the last 20 years, laparoscopic colonic surgery has become an accepted first-line treatment for colon cancer. A population-based study showed that laparoscopic colonic resections can be performed with lower hospital costs up to 90 days after discharge when compared to open surgery. Laparoscopic colonic resections have also been associated with fewer postoperative complications and lower mortality. New Zealand has one of the highest rates of bowel cancer in the world, and it is the second highest cause of cancer deaths in New Zealand. With the implementation of a bowel screening programme in New Zealand, the projected numbers of stage 1 bowel cancers are expected to increase. More avenues to improve perioperative care need to be explored to improve patient outcomes. Controlling postoperative pain effectively has been shown to reduce the length of hospital stay and improve patient/clinical outcomes. Opioids work as μ-receptor agonists in the spinal cord and brain, and although opioids are excellent at reducing pain, they are associated with nausea, vomiting, dizziness, decreased blood pressure, and urinary retention. Epidurals have been incorporated into Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols for controlling post-operative pain. However, epidurals are an invasive procedure with significant side effects such as hypotension, urinary retention, respiratory depression, motor blockade and rarely epidural abscess and meningitis. It has also been shown that up to 30 percent of epidural catheters dislodge, block or leak. These complications have led to a movement towards other regional analgesia techniques which allow local anaesthetic (LA) to target the abdominal wound specifically. Intraperitoneal local anaesthetic (IPLA) has shown promise in reducing pain after colonic surgery with a meta-analysis9, and a recent IPLA colorectal study conducted at Counties Manukau health showing that it reduces pain and opioid use over and above the effect of an epidural10, which is primarily aimed at the abdominal wound. After an IPLA bolus serum local anaesthetic levels are detectable within 2 minutes. Some studies show reduced early postoperative pain and opioid consumption with intravenous lignocaine infusion alone. The question remains however if there is a benefit from using intraperitoneal local anaesthetic compared to administering it intravenously as the IPLA should block both the intraabdominal wound, via a local action, and the skin wound via a systemic action.. This has been investigated in four studies, however none of these studies compared intravenous local anaesthetic (IVLA) and IPLA for colon resection. The aim is that, by optimising analgesia regimes using local anaesthetic, we can improve patient experience of pain and recovery thereby achieving an earlier discharge and early recovery from surgery. This has significant economic benefits for all involved.

Interventions

DRUGIV Saline bolus and infusion

Intravenous bolus of normal saline at induction 3 day postoperative infusion of normal saline administered by ambit pump

DRUGIP Saline bolus and infusion

Intraperitoneal bolus of normal saline down first port site. 3 day post operative intraperitoneal infusion of normal saline via an intraperitoneal line inserted by the surgeon. Infusion will be administered by ambit pump.

DRUGIV lignocaine bolus and infusion

Intravenous lignocaine bolus at induction. 3 day postoperative IV infusion of lignocaine administered by ambit pump

DRUGIP Lignocaine bolus and infusion

Intraperitoneal bolus of lignocaine down first port site. 3 day post operative intraperitoneal infusion of lignocaine via an intraperitoneal line inserted by the surgeon. Infusion will be administered by ambit pump.

Sponsors

University of Auckland, New Zealand
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* consecutive consenting patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colonic resections will be recruited from surgical outpatient clinics at Manukau Super Clinic.

Exclusion criteria

* under 16 years of age * acute colonic resection * those with ASA \>= 4 * previous adverse reaction/allergy to local anaesthetic, * surgery for rectal lesions which was defined as lesion within 15 cm of the anal verge * preoperative systemic steroid dependence * hepatic dysfunction, opioid use greater than 6 months * a diagnosis of Chronic Pain Syndrome * inability to consent or complete data scores in the study questionnaires due to cognitive impairment and/or language barrier.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Morphine consumption3 daysTotal morphine consumption at day 3

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Systemic Inflammatory Response (CRP and WBC)very morning post op starting day 1 until day 4 post opBlood test
Systemic Local Anesthetic Levelevery morning post op starting day 1 until day 4 post opBlood test
Length of stayVariable measure as it is dependent on the patients recovery after surgery. Cut off 3 weeksThe day that the patient is discharged will be recorded
Pain scores0, 6, 12 hours and Postoperative day (POD) 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7Pain scores using the visual analogue score (VAS)
Readmissions complications30 days post opReadmissions complications will be recorded up to day 30 post op using the Clavien-Dindo Classification
Surgical recovery scores (SRS)Up to 60 days post opSRS questionnaires will be administered at day 1 till discharge then POD 14, 30 and 60
Return of bowel functionVariable measure as it is dependent on the patients recovery after surgery. Cut off 3 weeksTime to flatus, first bowel motion

Countries

New Zealand

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026