Intervertebral Disc Degeneration, Lumbar Disc Herniation, Spinal Stenosis Lumbar
Conditions
Keywords
CBT, RCT, TLIF
Brief summary
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) had been favorable for effectively decrease pain and disability in specific spinal disorders; however, there has been concern regarding pedicle screw placement during TLIF surgery. Recently, several biomechanical studies had demonstrated that CBT technique achieves screw purchase and strength equivalent to or greater than the traditional method. Furthermore, Only 1 report examined the surgical outcomes of TLIF with CBT screws fixation compared with TLIF using traditional pedicle screws fixation. TLIF with CBT screws fixation may be effective for specific spinal disorders, but the evidence supporting this possibility is still limited.
Detailed description
Methods and analysis: Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) will be conducted. A total of 108 participants will be randomly allocated to either a CBT-TLIF group or a PS-TLIF group at a ratio of 1:1. The primary clinical outcome measures are: change in back and lower limb pain with Visual analogue scale (VAS) and change in quality adjusted life years (QALY) will be assessed by EQ-5D-5L. Measurements will be carried out at five fixed time points (pre-operatively and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months). Ethics and dissemination: The study had been reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of the Second affiliated hospital of the Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China(batch:2017-03). The results will be presented in peer-reviewed journals and related website within 2 years after the last operation.
Interventions
PROCEDUREcortical bone trajectory screws
cortical bone trajectory screws fixation takes the place of traditional pedicle screws fixation will be used in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
PROCEDUREpedicle screws
traditional pedicle screws fixation will be used in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Sponsors
Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
1. Age of at least 18 years; 2. All of participants will be informed consent; 3. Chronic low back pain (visual analogue scale at least 3 out of 10 at rest and at least 5 out of 10 under physical strain) after having failed conservative treatment for 6 months; 4. Single-segment lower lumbar vertebral disease (Including lumbar spinal cannal stenosis, foraminal stenosis, segmental instability, lumbar disc herniation, and painful disc degeneration (back disc);
Exclusion criteria
1. Serious deformity of lumbar vertebrae; 2. Dysplasia of lumbar pedicle or vertebral laminar; 3. Obvious osteoporosis of lumbar vertebrae; 4. Metabolic bone diseases such as osteomalacia or Paget's disease; 5. Spondylolisthesis \> grade 2 (Meyerding); 6. Caudaequina injury or severe radiculopathy; 7. Post inflammatory instability of the vertebral spine; 8. Body mass index \> 30; 9. Immunologic diseases or Metabolic syndrome; 10. Therapy with systemic corticosteroids or immunosuppressants; 11. Current using Coumadin (or Warfarin) or Heparin therapy for more than 6 months at the time of operation.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Visual analogue scale(VAS) | up to 36 months | pain score |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) | up to 48 months | The Oswestry Disability Index pain score |
| Symptomatic adjacent-segment disease (SASD) | up to 48 months | Symptomatic adjacent-segment disease rate |
| Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) | up to 48 months | Japanese Orthopedic Association score |
Countries
China
Outcome results
None listed