Skip to content

Prostatic Artery Embolization for Obstructive Uropathy Due to Prostate Cancer

Prostatic Artery Embolization for Obstructive Uropathy Due to Prostate Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03104907
Enrollment
15
Registered
2017-04-07
Start date
2017-03-22
Completion date
2018-11-27
Last updated
2018-11-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostatic Neoplasm, Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, Urological Manifestations, Prostatic Diseases

Keywords

IPSS, Quality of Life, DAN-PSS, Complications, Prostate cancer

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of prostatic artery embolization of patients with recurrent symptoms secondary to locally advanced prostatic cancer including pelvic pain, bleeding or need for permanent urinary catheter who are unfit for or refuse surgical treatment.

Detailed description

This is a prospective study investigating the safety and efficacy of PAE for patients with prostate cancer who suffers from acute urinary retention, severe LUTS and/or recurrent complications such as haematuria. Our hypothesis is that PAE will eliminate the need for indwelling catheter and improve IPSS and QoL 12 months post-procedure. 1, and 6 months follow-up. Main outcome Ability to void after removal of indwelling catheter Secondary outcomes International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Quality of Life (QoL) International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Prostate volume Peak void flow (Qmax) Post-void residual (PVR) Classify complications according to Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) guidelines for reporting Prostate-specific antigen (PSA)

Interventions

The procedure is performed with the patient under local anaesthetic and if necessary sedation. We will be using a percutaneous transfemoral approach, super-selective catheterisation of small prostatic arteries is carried out using microcatheters. Embolisation will be done using microspherical embolic material.

Sponsors

Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Indwelling catheter secondary to locally advanced prostate cancer (PCa) or * Moderate-severe Obstructive LUTS secondary to PCa * Unsuitable for or refuse surgery

Exclusion criteria

* Bladder dysfunction(and known neurological conditions affecting bladder function) * Urethral strictures * Bladder neck contracture * Known sphincter anomalies * Big bladder diverticulum or stones * Kidney insufficiency (eGFR \< 45) * Coagulation disturbances * Severe atheromatous or tortuosity of arteries * Allergy to contrast medium * Unable to undergo MR imaging * Bladder malignancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ability to void spontaneously1 monthsThe ability to void after removal of the indwelling catheter

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
QoL1, 6 monthsQuality of Life (scale)
IIEF1, 6 monthsInternational Index of Erectile Function
PV1, 6 monthsProstate Volume
IPSS1, 6 monthsInternational Prostate Symptom Score
Qmax1, 6 monthsPeak void flow
PSA1, 24-hours, 6 monthsProstate-specific antigen
PVR1, 6 monthsPost-void residual

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 3, 2026