Skip to content

Vitamin D as a Therapeutic Adjunct in the Stimulant Treatment of ADHD

Vitamin D as a Therapeutic Adjunct in the Stimulant Treatment of ADHD: a Proof-of-concept Study of Stimulant-induced Dopamine Release Using [11C]-PHNO PET in Healthy Humans

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03103750
Enrollment
24
Registered
2017-04-06
Start date
2017-08-15
Completion date
2023-01-17
Last updated
2024-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

ADHD

Keywords

Vitamin D

Brief summary

Specific Aim 1: As part of a within-subject, two-days, study design, to determine whether acute calcitriol (vs. placebo) pre-treatment is associated with greater amphetamine (Amp)-induced dopamine (DA) release in the caudate, putamen, ventral striatum (VST), and substantia nigra / ventral tegmental area (SN/VTA) of healthy human subjects. Specific Aim 2: To determine whether acute calcitriol (vs. placebo) pre-treatment is associated with better performance on a test of attention (e.g., the Continuous Performance Task or CPT-IP), after treatment with amphetamine. Hypothesis: Investigators hypothesize that Subjects pre-treated with calcitriol will have faster reaction times/higher accuracy on the CPT-IP vs. subjects pre-treated with placebo, after treatment with amphetamine.

Detailed description

Increases in the rates of childhood ADHD over the past two decades have lead to speculation that calcitriol deficiency (e.g., secondary to the increased use of sunscreen and/or increases in sedentary, indoor lifestyles in children) plays a causal/contributory role in the etiology of ADHD. To date, evidence of a direct link is lacking. One study showed higher maternal circulating Vitamin D levels in pregnancy are associated with lower risk of developing ADHD-like symptoms in childhood. On the other hand, another study did not replicate the above association, and a prospective study using umbilical cord samples stored at the time of birth reported no difference in serum vitamin D levels between ADHD group versus healthy controls. In terms of clinical trials, one randomized double blind study among adults with ADHD reported a beneficial effect of the intervention, measured with the Conners Adult ADHR rating scale, in comparison with placebo, but the intervention included the combination of vitamin D and several other micronutrients. An analysis of moderators of a positive response to ADHD behaviors did not reveal a significant predictive effect of vitamin D. However, recent studies provide intriguing indirect evidence of an inverse relationship between solar intensity (SI) and/or altitude (a proxy for greater sun/UV light exposure) and regional rates of ADHD. One study examined three large datasets across 49 U.S. states for 2003 and 2007, and across 9 non-U.S. countries. This study examined the prevalence of ADHD and Solar Intensity (SI) maps. They found an inverse association between solar intensity and prevalence of ADHD. Another study examined two national survey datasets. They found an inverse relationship between altitude and prevalence of ADHD. Investigators hypothesize, as suggested by Huber, that a common denominator on the above studies is the increased vitamin D levels in those exposed to a higher solar intensity, which is known to increase with altitude.

Interventions

PROCEDUREMagnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans (3 T) will be collected in each subject for the purposes of excluding participants with anatomical abnormalities and anatomically co-registering PET and MRI for image analysis

DRUGPHNO

Used as a tracer for in vivo imaging.

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTcalcitriol

three 0.5 mcg capsules

DRUGPlacebo oral capsule

three 0.5 mcg capsules

PROCEDUREhigh-resolution research tomography

A functional imaging technique that is used to observe metabolic processes in the body.

DRUGDextro Amphetamine

Dexedrine 0.3 mg/kg, to a maximum dose of 30 mg

Sponsors

Brain & Behavior Research Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)
CollaboratorNIH
Yale University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Intervention model description

This is a within-subject, two-day four-scan, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study design.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18-50 years * Voluntary, written, informed consent * Physically healthy by medical history, physical, neurological, ECG, and laboratory examinations * For females, non-lactating, with a negative serum or urine pregnancy test * Lab results without clinically relevant findings (e.g. renal function, electrolytes, and vitamin D levels) * English speaking

Exclusion criteria

* Medical contraindication to Dexedrine administration (e.g., history of cardiac problems, seizures, glaucoma, hypertension, hyperthyroidism, etc.) * Medical contraindication to calcitriol administration (e.g., history of hypersensitivity to calcitriol or any component of the formulation, hypercalcemia or vitamin D toxicity) * History of substance dependence (e.g., alcohol, opiates, sedative hypnotics), except for nicotine * A primary major DSM-5 psychiatric disorder (e.g., schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depression, etc.) as determined by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID) * A history of significant medical (e.g., cardiovascular, diabetic/metabolic) or neurological (e.g., cerebrovascular accidents, seizure, traumatic brain injury) illness * Positive answers on the cardiac history questionnaire that may place the subject at higher risk, as determined by an internal medicine specialist or cardiologist's review of both the questionnaire responses and screening ECG * Current use of psychotropic and/or potentially psychoactive prescription medications * For females, laboratory (β-HCG) or physical evidence of pregnancy/lactation 9) MRI-incompatible implants and other contraindications for MRI (i.e., aneurysm clip, metal fragments, internal electrical devices such as a cochlear implant, spinal cord stimulator or pacemaker) * History of claustrophobia or feeling of inability to lie still on his/her back for the PET or MRI scans * History of any bleeding disorder or current anticoagulant therapy * Donation or loss of 550 mL of blood or more (including plasmapheresis) or receipt of a transfusion of any blood product within 8 weeks prior to the first test day. * Use of any prescription medications and/or over-the-counter medications, vitamins and/or herbal supplements which could have a negative clinical interaction with calcitriol/Dexedrine or which could confound scientific results of the study, within 2 weeks prior to each test day (e.g., thiazide diuretics, Mg based antiacids, digoxin, etc,.). * Serum levels of 25(OH)D3 below 20 ng/ml. * Obesity i.e. BMI over 30 (more prone to lower vitamin D levels) * Subjects with history of prior radiation exposure for research purposes within the past year such that participation in this study would place them over Radioactive Drug Research Committee (RDRC) limits for annual radiation exposure. This guideline is an effective dose of 5 rem received per year. * Subjects with current, past or anticipated exposure to radiation in the work place * History of kidney stones within the past 5 years * Any degree of renal failure * History of parathyroid disorder (hyper or hypoparathyroidism) * History of osteoporosis or any pathologic fractures * Vitamin D supplementation in any form in the past 3 months * Known hypersensitivity to Dexedrine, \[11C\]PHNO, or calcitriol * Malabsorption syndromes (i.e. Celiac sprue) * Serum corrected calcium \> 10.5 mg/dl or phosphate \> 4.2 mg/dl

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Non-displaceable Tracer Binding Potentialsday 1non-displaceable tracer binding potentials (BPND = VT - VREF / VREF), which are linearly proportional to the density of available D2/3 Rs, computed using a simplified reference tissue model (SRTM) utilizing the cerebellum as a reference region.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Continuous Performance Task (CPT-IP)day 1In this computer based test, subjects are shown a random sequence of numbers (2-digit, 3-digit, and 4-digit) and are instructed to press a button as quickly and accurately as possible (with their preferred hand) when a number repeats. Subjects are instructed to withhold their response for any other sequence of numbers. The measure is presented as dprime, which is calculated: d' = z(H) - z(F), where z(H) is the z-score of the hit rate and z(F) is the z-score of the false positive rate. A z-score of 0 represents the population mean. d' is indicates better performance on the task with higher values, z(H) indicates better performance on the task with higher values due to higher hit rate, and z(F) indicates worse performance on the task with higher values due to higher false positive rates.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Overall Participants
Baseline characteristics of all participants prior to group order randomization.
24
Total24

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event10
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10
Overall StudyPET Equipment Related22

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOverall Participants
Age, Continuous31.96 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.58
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
11 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
13 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
11 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
24 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 120 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 126 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Non-displaceable Tracer Binding Potentials

non-displaceable tracer binding potentials (BPND = VT - VREF / VREF), which are linearly proportional to the density of available D2/3 Rs, computed using a simplified reference tissue model (SRTM) utilizing the cerebellum as a reference region.

Time frame: day 1

Population: Participants required complete imaging data (i.e., 4/4 completed PET scans and a completed MRI) in order to be included in analysis. Thus, only n = 18 participants were analyzed to assess BPND.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CalcitriolNon-displaceable Tracer Binding PotentialsRegion of interest: Ventral Striatum2.93 ratioStandard Deviation 0.63
CalcitriolNon-displaceable Tracer Binding PotentialsRegion of interest: Putamen2.21 ratioStandard Deviation 0.47
CalcitriolNon-displaceable Tracer Binding PotentialsRegion of interest: Substantia Nigra/Ventral Tegmental Area0.92 ratioStandard Deviation 0.3
CalcitriolNon-displaceable Tracer Binding PotentialsRegion of interest: Caudate1.50 ratioStandard Deviation 0.3
PlaceboNon-displaceable Tracer Binding PotentialsRegion of interest: Substantia Nigra/Ventral Tegmental Area1.01 ratioStandard Deviation 0.24
PlaceboNon-displaceable Tracer Binding PotentialsRegion of interest: Ventral Striatum2.91 ratioStandard Deviation 0.32
PlaceboNon-displaceable Tracer Binding PotentialsRegion of interest: Caudate1.50 ratioStandard Deviation 0.19
PlaceboNon-displaceable Tracer Binding PotentialsRegion of interest: Putamen2.21 ratioStandard Deviation 0.26
Primary

Non-displaceable Tracer Binding Potentials

non-displaceable tracer binding potentials (BPND = VT - VREF / VREF), which are linearly proportional to the density of available D2/3 Rs, computed using a simplified reference tissue model (SRTM) utilizing the cerebellum as a reference region.

Time frame: day 7

Population: Participants required complete imaging data (i.e., 4/4 completed PET scans and a completed MRI) in order to be included in analysis. Thus, only n = 18 participants were analyzed to assess BPND.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CalcitriolNon-displaceable Tracer Binding PotentialsRegion of interest: Ventral Striatum2.91 ratioStandard Deviation 0.32
CalcitriolNon-displaceable Tracer Binding PotentialsRegion of interest: Caudate1.52 ratioStandard Deviation 0.21
CalcitriolNon-displaceable Tracer Binding PotentialsRegion of interest: Putamen2.31 ratioStandard Deviation 0.28
CalcitriolNon-displaceable Tracer Binding PotentialsRegion of interest: Substantia Nigra/Ventral Tegmental Area1.08 ratioStandard Deviation 0.25
PlaceboNon-displaceable Tracer Binding PotentialsRegion of interest: Substantia Nigra/Ventral Tegmental Area1.07 ratioStandard Deviation 0.31
PlaceboNon-displaceable Tracer Binding PotentialsRegion of interest: Ventral Striatum3.05 ratioStandard Deviation 0.66
PlaceboNon-displaceable Tracer Binding PotentialsRegion of interest: Putamen2.38 ratioStandard Deviation 0.47
PlaceboNon-displaceable Tracer Binding PotentialsRegion of interest: Caudate1.59 ratioStandard Deviation 0.3
Comparison: The primary hypothesis of calcitriol-related differences in amphetamine-induced dopamine release was determined by significance of the main effect of medication (calcitriol vs. placebo) on %change in BPND (i.e., post-Amp relative to pre-Amp scans) at a threshold of p\<0.05.p-value: 0.016Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Continuous Performance Task (CPT-IP)

In this computer based test, subjects are shown a random sequence of numbers (2-digit, 3-digit, and 4-digit) and are instructed to press a button as quickly and accurately as possible (with their preferred hand) when a number repeats. Subjects are instructed to withhold their response for any other sequence of numbers. The measure is presented as dprime, which is calculated: d' = z(H) - z(F), where z(H) is the z-score of the hit rate and z(F) is the z-score of the false positive rate. A z-score of 0 represents the population mean. d' is indicates better performance on the task with higher values, z(H) indicates better performance on the task with higher values due to higher hit rate, and z(F) indicates worse performance on the task with higher values due to higher false positive rates.

Time frame: day 1

Population: All participants completed both study arms

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CalcitriolContinuous Performance Task (CPT-IP)3.03 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.74
PlaceboContinuous Performance Task (CPT-IP)3.35 z-scoreStandard Deviation 1.22
Secondary

Continuous Performance Task (CPT-IP)

In this computer based test, subjects are shown a random sequence of numbers (2-digit, 3-digit, and 4-digit) and are instructed to press a button as quickly and accurately as possible (with their preferred hand) when a number repeats. Subjects are instructed to withhold their response for any other sequence of numbers. The measure is presented as dprime, which is calculated: d' = z(H) - z(F), where z(H) is the z-score of the hit rate and z(F) is the z-score of the false positive rate. A z-score of 0 represents the population mean. d' is indicates better performance on the task with higher values, z(H) indicates better performance on the task with higher values due to higher hit rate, and z(F) indicates worse performance on the task with higher values due to higher false positive rates.

Time frame: day 7

Population: All participants completed both study arms.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CalcitriolContinuous Performance Task (CPT-IP)3.03 z scoreStandard Deviation 0.74
PlaceboContinuous Performance Task (CPT-IP)3.22 z scoreStandard Deviation 0.42
p-value: 0.55t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026