Skip to content

Promotion of Emotional Well-being in Hospitalized Cancer Patients by Virtual Reality

A Brief Psychological Intervention Using Virtual Reality for the Promotion of Emotional Well-being in Hospitalized Cancer Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03103711
Enrollment
76
Registered
2017-04-06
Start date
2010-07-31
Completion date
2011-12-31
Last updated
2017-04-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer

Keywords

Virtual reality, Well-being, Hospital

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of a brief psychological intervention supported by Information and Communication Technologies, on the subjective well-being of hospitalized cancer patients. Participants are randomly assigned to one of 2 conditions: Intervention condition (4 Virtual reality sessions) and Control condition (waiting list control group).

Interventions

Participants receive two sessions oriented to joy and two focused on relax. In the first 2 sessions patients can choose the environment (Emotional Parks or Walk through Nature) and in the following ones participants visit the alternate environments.

Sponsors

Hospital Clínica Benidorm
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Universitat Jaume I
CollaboratorOTHER
Universitat Politècnica de València
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Valencia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adults with any cancer diagnosis * hospitalized for at least 1 week * Karnofsky functional state ≥50 * life expectancy ≥2 months

Exclusion criteria

* serious psychopathology * cognitive impairment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (Zigmond & Snaith, 1983; adapted version of Tejero, Guimerá, Farré & Peri, 1986)change from baseline at 1 week
Fordyce Happiness Scale (Fordyce, 1988).change from baseline at 1 week

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analog Scale: Emotional State. Change from pre to post session.4 days along 1 weekAssessment of general mood, joy, sadness, anxiety, relax and vigor (7-point Likert scale)
Visual Analog Scale: Mood.4 days along 1 weekSubjective mood change after each intervention session.
Visual Analog Scale: Physical Discomfort. Change from pre to post session.4 days along 1 weekPresence of pain, fatigue and physical discomfort (11-point Likert scale)
Visual Analog Scale: Satisfaction with the Session Scale.4 days along 1 weekLevel of pleasantness and perceived usefulness of each session (11-point Likert scale)
Satisfaction with Intervention Scale (adapted version of Borkovec and Nau's, 1972)1 weekAssesses satisfaction, recommendation, utility and discomfort (11-point Likert scale)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analog Scale: Life satisfactionbaseline7-point scale (no satisfaction - completely satisfied)
Visual Analog Scale: Optimismbaseline11-point scale (not at all - completely)
The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ) (Broadbent et al., 2006)baselineThis instrument has 9 items aimed to evaluate the cognitive and emotional representation of the illness (consequences, timeline, personal control, treatment control, identity, concern, emotional response, illness coherence and causes).
Personal meaning of the illness (ad-hoc).baselinePatient has 6 alternatives of illness meaning (Loss, threat, challenge, blame-others, blame-self and opportunity). In addition to these alternatives, participant can add any other personal meaning.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026