Skip to content

A Bioavailability Study of Methotrexate 25 mg Administered by Needle Injection and a Pre Filled Needle-free Device in Healthy Volunteers.

A Single Center Single Dose Open-label Randomized Two Period Crossover Study to Determine the Bioavailability of Two Formulations of Methotrexate 25 mg Administered by Needle Injection and a Pre-filled Needle-free Device in at Least 48 Healthy Volunteers.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03103334
Enrollment
58
Registered
2017-04-06
Start date
2014-06-30
Completion date
2014-12-31
Last updated
2021-02-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy

Brief summary

The objective is to determine whether the test product, Methotrexate 40 mg/mL solution for injection administered subcutaneously by the prefilled and needle-free delivery system Zeneo®, and the reference product, Methotrexate Biodim® 25 mg/mL, solution for injection administered subcutaneously by a conventional syringe with needle are bioequivalent.

Detailed description

ABSTRACT Objective: Zeneo1 is a needle-free injection device. We performed a pharmacokinetic study to investigate the bioequivalence of methotrexate administered subcutaneously using either the needle-free injection device or a conventional needle and syringe. Research design and methods: This was a single-dose, open-label, laboratory-blind, randomized crossover study performed in adult healthy volunteers. Each participant received two methotrexate injections (each 25mg), one via needle-free injection device and one via conventional injection, with a 21-28 day wash-out interval between dosing. For each participant, the administration site for both injections was either the abdomen or the thigh. Main outcome measures: The primary pharmacokinetic outcome parameters were AUC(0-t) and Cmax. Bioequivalence was assessed by standard criteria: whether 90% confidence intervals of geometric mean ratios for the two administration methods were within 80-125%. Results: Fifty-two individuals completed the study. Bioequivalence criteria were met for AUC(0-t), for the overall analysis (both injection sites: 90% confidence interval: 99.4-103.1%), and for each injection site separately. Bioequivalence was similarly demonstrated with AUC(0-1). Bioequivalence criteria for Cmax were fulfilled for abdominal administration but not for the overall analysis. Injection via the needle- free injection device was well tolerated. Limitations: Limitations include conducting the study in healthy volunteers and the relatively small subject number (albeit satisfactory for bioequivalence). Conclusions: This study shows that methotrexate injection via needle-free injection device is bioequivalent to a conventional needle and syringe in relation to AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-1). Studies of needle-free injection device use in patients requiring methotrexate therapy are planned.

Interventions

OTHERZeneo® - Methotrexate

0.625 mL of methotrexate solution 40 mg/ML for subcutaneous injection with a prefilled and needle-free delivery system

DRUGMethotrexate Biodim®

1 mL of methotrexate solution 25 mg/mL for subcutaneous injection with a conventional needle and syringe injection

Sponsors

Crossject
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy subjects * BMI between 18.5 and 30 kg/m2 * Body mass \> 60 kg * Non-tobacco user * Written consent given for participation in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Evidence of clinically relevant oral, cardiovascular, hematologic, gastrointestinal, hepatic, renal, endocrine, pulmonary, neurologic, psychiatric or skin disorder * Heavy alcohol consumption and regular exposure to drug of abuse

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax).serial pharmacokinetic plasma concentrations were drawn prior pre-dose and post-dose at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16 and 24 hours
Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) time zero to time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC(0-t)).serial pharmacokinetic plasma concentrations were drawn prior pre-dose and post-dose at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16 and 24 hours

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026