Skip to content

Reducing Urinary Tract Infection Rates Using a Controlled Aseptic Protocol for Catheter Insertion

Reducing Urinary Tract Infection Rates Using a Controlled Aseptic Protocol for Catheter Insertion

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03101371
Enrollment
99
Registered
2017-04-05
Start date
2017-10-10
Completion date
2019-02-15
Last updated
2020-03-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Catheter Infection, Catheter-Related Infections, Urinary Tract Infections

Brief summary

Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) complications following catheter use in surgical patients remains high. Using an aseptic protocol has been shown to drastically reduce UTI incidence by 50%. Reducing UTIs will prevent extended hospital stays, readmission, and antibiotic use associated with this complication and improve cost-effectiveness of care. The investigators hypothesize that they can reduce the incidence of UTIs after catheter placement with the implementation of a Quality Improvement (QI) protocol to prevent excess exposure to the environment exposure of the catheter before, during and after insertion.

Interventions

DRUGCatheter insertion with Povidone Iodine

The catheter will be treated with Povidone Iodine prior to insertion.

PROCEDUREStandard of care catheter insertion

Catheter inserted right out of package.

Sponsors

University of Colorado, Denver
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Patients with normal urinary analysis (UA) pre-surgery will be randomized 1:1 to one of two arms prior to surgery: 1. Aseptic protocol for catheter insertion using Povidone Iodine treated catheter and maintaining plastic sleeve on catheter or 2. Standard of care (SOC) catheter insertion in which catheter is inserted right out of package/non-treated catheter.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 89 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. women 18-89 years of age 2. admitted for surgery lasting \>1 hour and requiring urinary catheter, 3. have normal urine analysis within 24 hours pre-surgery, and 4. able to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. currently on dialysis, 2. chronic urinary infection, 3. hyperthyroidism, 4. current infection, 5. a history of allergy or sensitivity to iodine. 6. women who are pregnant or breast feeding 7. men due to their lower incidence of UTIs compared to the female population.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With a Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI)Within 14 +/- 2 days post-surgeryParticipants were monitored for up to 14 days. This was assessed with a rapid urine analysis (UA) test. A urinary tract infection was defined as \>10\^5 bacterial colony forming units per ML on urine culture regardless of symptoms. This is the number of participants who had at least one CAUTI during the time of observation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Average Patient SatisfactionDay14 (+/- 2 days)Participants were monitored at 2 weeks. This was assessed using a Likert scale questionnaire (1 = not at all satisfied, 10 = extremely satisfied). Average patient satisfaction with the catheter was assessed.
Number of Participants With Extended Hospital Stay Due to a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI)14 days (+/- 2 days) from surgeryParticipants were monitored for up to 14 days. This is the number of participants who had a UTI in the hospital, extending their stay for more than seven days.
Number of Participants Who Received the Fill and Pull Versus the Pull and Void Method of Catheter DiscontinuationDay 14 (+/- 2 days)Participants were monitored for up to 2 weeks. This is the number of participants who received one method versus the other for catheter discontinuation.
Number of Participants That Were Readmitted, Had Additional Clinic Visits or Went to the Emergency Department (ED) for Any ReasonDay 14 (+/- 2 days)Participants were monitored up to two weeks. This is the number of participants who had at least one readmission or emergency room visit during the time of observation.
Number of Patients That Used Antibiotics at the Time of Surgery and Post-surgeryDay 14 (+/- 2 days)Participants were monitored for up to 2 weeks. This is the number of participants that used any antibiotic during surgery and post-surgery.
Number of Participants With Closed Drainage System Disrupted During Placement of CatheterDay 1 post opParticipants were monitored post surgery until time of discharge. This is the number of participants who had the closed drainage system disrupted during placement of catheter for back fill of the bladder during surgery.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A single-site randomized controlled trial, conducted at the University of Colorado Hospital, enrolled women beginning October 2017 and ended February 2019.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Standard of Care Protocol Catheter Insertion
Standard of care catheter insertion in which catheter is inserted right out of package/non-treated catheter. Standard of care catheter insertion: Catheter inserted right out of package.
45
Aseptic Protocol for Catheter Insertion
Aseptic protocol for catheter insertion using Povidone Iodine treated catheter and maintaining plastic sleeve on catheter Catheter insertion with Povidone Iodine: The catheter will be treated with Povidone Iodine prior to insertion.
45
Total90

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDid not meet eligibility criteria21
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up14
Overall StudyPhysician Decision01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAseptic Protocol for Catheter InsertionTotalStandard of Care Protocol Catheter Insertion
Age, Continuous56.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.27
56.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.75
56.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.37
Cancer Diagnosis
Benign
8 Participants13 Participants5 Participants
Cancer Diagnosis
Cervical
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Cancer Diagnosis
Other
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Cancer Diagnosis
Ovarian Cancer
24 Participants50 Participants26 Participants
Cancer Diagnosis
Uterine Cancer
10 Participants20 Participants10 Participants
Diabetes6 Participants10 Participants4 Participants
Hypertension18 Participants34 Participants16 Participants
Menopause status
Post-menopausal
30 Participants60 Participants30 Participants
Menopause status
Pre-menopausal
15 Participants30 Participants15 Participants
Primary Surgery
Bilateral/unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy
5 Participants8 Participants3 Participants
Primary Surgery
Bowel resection
2 Participants6 Participants4 Participants
Primary Surgery
Lymph Node Dissection
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Primary Surgery
Omentectomy
4 Participants10 Participants6 Participants
Primary Surgery
Other
6 Participants12 Participants6 Participants
Primary Surgery
Radical Hysterectomy
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Primary Surgery
Total Abdominal Hysterectomy +/- BSO/USO
28 Participants51 Participants23 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/ethnic group
African American
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/ethnic group
American Indian or Alaskan Native
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/ethnic group
Asian
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/ethnic group
Hispanic
6 Participants8 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/ethnic group
White Non-Hispanic
36 Participants76 Participants40 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
45 Participants90 Participants45 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Smoking status
Current
6 Participants11 Participants5 Participants
Smoking status
Former
17 Participants29 Participants12 Participants
Smoking status
Never
22 Participants50 Participants28 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 450 / 45
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 453 / 45
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 450 / 45

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With a Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI)

Participants were monitored for up to 14 days. This was assessed with a rapid urine analysis (UA) test. A urinary tract infection was defined as \>10\^5 bacterial colony forming units per ML on urine culture regardless of symptoms. This is the number of participants who had at least one CAUTI during the time of observation.

Time frame: Within 14 +/- 2 days post-surgery

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Standard of Care Protocol Catheter InsertionNumber of Participants With a Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI)7 Participants
Aseptic Protocol for Catheter InsertionNumber of Participants With a Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI)6 Participants
Secondary

Average Patient Satisfaction

Participants were monitored at 2 weeks. This was assessed using a Likert scale questionnaire (1 = not at all satisfied, 10 = extremely satisfied). Average patient satisfaction with the catheter was assessed.

Time frame: Day14 (+/- 2 days)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard of Care Protocol Catheter InsertionAverage Patient Satisfaction8.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.39
Aseptic Protocol for Catheter InsertionAverage Patient Satisfaction8.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.04
Secondary

Number of Participants That Were Readmitted, Had Additional Clinic Visits or Went to the Emergency Department (ED) for Any Reason

Participants were monitored up to two weeks. This is the number of participants who had at least one readmission or emergency room visit during the time of observation.

Time frame: Day 14 (+/- 2 days)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Standard of Care Protocol Catheter InsertionNumber of Participants That Were Readmitted, Had Additional Clinic Visits or Went to the Emergency Department (ED) for Any Reason0 Participants
Aseptic Protocol for Catheter InsertionNumber of Participants That Were Readmitted, Had Additional Clinic Visits or Went to the Emergency Department (ED) for Any Reason1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Received the Fill and Pull Versus the Pull and Void Method of Catheter Discontinuation

Participants were monitored for up to 2 weeks. This is the number of participants who received one method versus the other for catheter discontinuation.

Time frame: Day 14 (+/- 2 days)

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Standard of Care Protocol Catheter InsertionNumber of Participants Who Received the Fill and Pull Versus the Pull and Void Method of Catheter DiscontinuationFill and pull38 Participants
Standard of Care Protocol Catheter InsertionNumber of Participants Who Received the Fill and Pull Versus the Pull and Void Method of Catheter DiscontinuationPull and void7 Participants
Aseptic Protocol for Catheter InsertionNumber of Participants Who Received the Fill and Pull Versus the Pull and Void Method of Catheter DiscontinuationFill and pull40 Participants
Aseptic Protocol for Catheter InsertionNumber of Participants Who Received the Fill and Pull Versus the Pull and Void Method of Catheter DiscontinuationPull and void5 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Closed Drainage System Disrupted During Placement of Catheter

Participants were monitored post surgery until time of discharge. This is the number of participants who had the closed drainage system disrupted during placement of catheter for back fill of the bladder during surgery.

Time frame: Day 1 post op

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Standard of Care Protocol Catheter InsertionNumber of Participants With Closed Drainage System Disrupted During Placement of Catheter42 Participants
Aseptic Protocol for Catheter InsertionNumber of Participants With Closed Drainage System Disrupted During Placement of Catheter42 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Extended Hospital Stay Due to a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI)

Participants were monitored for up to 14 days. This is the number of participants who had a UTI in the hospital, extending their stay for more than seven days.

Time frame: 14 days (+/- 2 days) from surgery

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Standard of Care Protocol Catheter InsertionNumber of Participants With Extended Hospital Stay Due to a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI)0 Participants
Aseptic Protocol for Catheter InsertionNumber of Participants With Extended Hospital Stay Due to a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI)1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients That Used Antibiotics at the Time of Surgery and Post-surgery

Participants were monitored for up to 2 weeks. This is the number of participants that used any antibiotic during surgery and post-surgery.

Time frame: Day 14 (+/- 2 days)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Standard of Care Protocol Catheter InsertionNumber of Patients That Used Antibiotics at the Time of Surgery and Post-surgeryCefazolin (1st gen cephalosporin))36 Participants
Standard of Care Protocol Catheter InsertionNumber of Patients That Used Antibiotics at the Time of Surgery and Post-surgeryCefoxitin Cefuroxime / Cefotetan (2nd gen cephalo5 Participants
Standard of Care Protocol Catheter InsertionNumber of Patients That Used Antibiotics at the Time of Surgery and Post-surgeryMetronidazole12 Participants
Standard of Care Protocol Catheter InsertionNumber of Patients That Used Antibiotics at the Time of Surgery and Post-surgeryClindamycin5 Participants
Standard of Care Protocol Catheter InsertionNumber of Patients That Used Antibiotics at the Time of Surgery and Post-surgeryDoxycycline0 Participants
Standard of Care Protocol Catheter InsertionNumber of Patients That Used Antibiotics at the Time of Surgery and Post-surgeryGentamicin3 Participants
Aseptic Protocol for Catheter InsertionNumber of Patients That Used Antibiotics at the Time of Surgery and Post-surgeryDoxycycline0 Participants
Aseptic Protocol for Catheter InsertionNumber of Patients That Used Antibiotics at the Time of Surgery and Post-surgeryCefazolin (1st gen cephalosporin))39 Participants
Aseptic Protocol for Catheter InsertionNumber of Patients That Used Antibiotics at the Time of Surgery and Post-surgeryClindamycin6 Participants
Aseptic Protocol for Catheter InsertionNumber of Patients That Used Antibiotics at the Time of Surgery and Post-surgeryCefoxitin Cefuroxime / Cefotetan (2nd gen cephalo0 Participants
Aseptic Protocol for Catheter InsertionNumber of Patients That Used Antibiotics at the Time of Surgery and Post-surgeryGentamicin6 Participants
Aseptic Protocol for Catheter InsertionNumber of Patients That Used Antibiotics at the Time of Surgery and Post-surgeryMetronidazole11 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026