Skip to content

A Trial to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Elamipretide in Subjects With Barth Syndrome

A Phase 2 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Injections of Elamipretide in Subjects With Genetically Confirmed Barth Syndrome Followed by Open-Label Treatment

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03098797
Acronym
TAZPOWER
Enrollment
12
Registered
2017-04-04
Start date
2017-07-05
Completion date
2021-10-11
Last updated
2024-04-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Barth Syndrome

Keywords

Barth Syndrome, elamipretide, MTP-131, Stealth, Stealth BT, BTHS

Brief summary

A randomized, double-blind cross over trial to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of elamipretide in subjects with Barth syndrome.

Detailed description

A phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of subcutaneous injections of elamipretide in subjects with genetically confirmed Barth syndrome followed by open-label treatment extension. Part 1 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial to assess safety, tolerability, and efficacy single daily subcutaneous (SC) doses of 40 mg elamipretide administered for 12 weeks in subjects with Barth syndrome. Part 2: This was an open-label extension trial to assess the long-term safety, tolerability, and longitudinal trends in efficacy single daily SC doses of 40 mg elamipretide for up to 192 weeks.

Interventions

40 mg daily subcutaneous injection for 12 weeks

DRUGPlacebo

daily subcutaneous injection for 12 weeks

Sponsors

Stealth BioTherapeutics Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

28 weeks, double-blinded crossover followed by a 168-week open label long term safety & tolerability trial.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Genetically confirmed Barth Syndrome * Male aged 12 and above * At the screening visit, eGFR must meet the following: 1. Body weight \>30 kg AND eGFR ≥ 90mL/min at screening 2. Body weight \>40kg AND eGFR ≥60 but \<90mL/min/ 1.73m² at screening * Ambulatory and impaired during the baseline 6MWT * On stable medication for 30 days prior to the baseline visit

Exclusion criteria

* Participated in another interventional clinical trial within 30 days of or is currently enrolled in a non-interventional clinical trial at the baseline visit potentially confounding with this trial * Prior or current medical condition that would prevent the subject from safely participating in the trial * Undergone any inpatient hospitalizations within 30 days of the baseline visit * Is undergoing an apparent pubertal growth spurt * Has uncontrolled hypertension * History of substance abused within the year before the baseline visit or is likely to be uncompliant * History of heart transplantation or current placement on the waiting list for a heart transplant * For subjects with an ICD: known occurrence of ICD discharge in the 3 months prior to the baseline visit * For subjects without an ICD: expected to undergo an implantation of an ICD during the conduct of the study * Currently receiving treatment with chemotherapeutic agents or immunosuppressant agents or has received prior radiation therapy to the chest * Recipient of stem cell or gene therapy or is currently being treated by a therapeutic investigational device

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Part 1: Distance Walked During the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) by VisitPre-dose to Week 12 (end of treatment)Average distance walked in meters during the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) at end of treatment, where end of treatment means end of Visit 5 (Week 12) for Period 1 and end of Visit 10 (Week 12) for Period 2. Results were pooled for each 12 week period.
Part 1: Total Fatigue Score Based on the BTHS-SA by Visit.Pre-dose, Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12 (end of treatment)Total Fatigue Score (Q1, Q2, and Q4) Based on the BarTH Syndrome Symptom Assessment (BTHS-SA) by visit at predose, Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12 (end of treatment). The BTHS-SA is 3-question fatigue assessment using a 0 to 4-point scale for each question where no fatigue =0 and very severe fatigue =4, with scores from all 3 questions combined and averaged for all subjects; a lower score means better outcome, higher score means a worse outcome. Combined Min score=0, max score =12. Weekly values are based on the weekly average of the last 7 days before the site or visiting nurse visit for both periods. Results from each 12-week period were combined, where end of treatment for Period 1 =Visit 5 (week 12), and End of Period 2 = Visit 10 (week 12)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Part 2: Change From Baseline: Total Fatigue Score (Q1, Q2, and Q4) Based on the BTHS-SA by VisitBaseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192Change from Baseline (mean) in Total Fatigue Score (Q1, Q2, and Q4) Based on the BarTH Syndrome Symptom Assessment (BTHS-SA) by visit. The BTHS-SA is 3-question fatigue assessment using a 0-4 point scale for each question where no fatigue =0 and very severe fatigue =4, with scores from all 3 questions combined and averaged for all subjects by visit; a lower score means better outcome, higher score means a worse outcome. Change from baseline: an increase in scores would mean worse outcome, a decrease in scores means better outcome. Combined Min score=-12, max score =12. Weekly values are based on the weekly average of the last 7 days before the site or visiting nurse visit for both periods. Baseline= Period 1 Predose.
Part 1: Muscle Strength as Measured by HHD by VisitPre-dose to Week 12 (end of treatment)Muscle strength as measured by handheld dynamometry (HHD) in Newtons, where end of treatment means end of Visit 5 (Week 12) for Period 1 and end of Visit 10 (Week 12) for Period 2. Results were pooled for each 12 week period. Handheld dynamometry assesses the average strength of the knee extensors of both legs.
Part 2: Change From Baseline: Muscle Strength by HHD (Newtons) by VisitBaseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96,168, 192Muscle strength as measured by handheld dynamometry (HHD) in Newtons. Handheld dynamometry assesses the average strength of the knee extensors of both legs. Change from baseline where Baseline= Part 1 Period 1 Pre-dose: the greater positive change, the better the outcome, the smaller positive change (or negative change) the number the worse the outcome.
Part 2: Change From Baseline: 5X Sit to Stand by VisitBaseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 168, 192Change in baseline in time (in seconds), where Baseline= Part 1 Period 1 Pre-dose to complete the Five Times Sit-To-Stand by visit. More time means worse outcome, less time means better outcome.
Part 1: SWAY Application Balance Assessments by VisitPre-dose to Week 12 (end of treatment)SWAY application balance assessment consists of five stances each performed for 10 seconds and scores postural stability on a scale from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better postural stability from Pre-dose to Week 12 (end of treatment), where end of treatment means end of Visit 5 (Week 12) for Period 1 and end of Visit 10 (Week 12) for Period 2. Results were pooled for each 12 week period.
Part 1: 5XSST by VisitPre-dose to Week 12 (end of treatment)Time (in seconds) to complete the Five Times Sit-To-Stand, where end of treatment means end of Visit 5 (Week 12) for Period 1 and end of Visit 10 (Week 12) for Period 2. Results were pooled for each 12 week period.
Part 1: Patient Global Impression Scales of SymptomsPre-dose, Week 1, Week 12 (end of treatment)Patient-reported health status over the past week, by visit, where end of treatment means end of Visit 5 (Week 12) for Period 1 and end of Visit 10 (Week 12) for Period 2. Results were pooled for each 12 week period. Scores range from 0-40 for adolescents and 0-50 for adults. PGI Scale is as follows: 0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe, and 4=Very Severe. Higher score means worse health status, means worse outcome; lower score means better health status, means better outcome.
Part 2: Change From Baseline: Patient Global Impression Scales of Symptoms by VisitBaseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192Part 2: Change from Baseline: Patient Global Impression Scales of Symptoms by Visit Patient-reported health status over the past week where Baseline= Part 1 Period 1 Pre-dose, administered at Week 12 for Period 1 and Period 2. Scores range from 0-40 for adolescents and 0-50 for adults. PGI Scale is as follows: 1=None, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe, and 5=Very Severe. Change from baseline: Higher score means worse health status, means worse outcome; lower score means better health status, means better outcome.
Part 1: Part 1: Clinician Global ImpressionPre-dose to Week 12 (end of treatment)Clinician Global Impression Scale by visit: Clinician-reported overall health status at end of treatment, administered at Week 12 for Period 1 and Period 2. Scores range from 0-6 for both adolescents and adults. PGI Scale is as follows: 1= Very much Better, 2= Moderately Better, 3= A Little Better, 4= No Change, and 5= A Little Worse 6= Very much Worse. Higher score means worse health status, means worse outcome; lower score means better health status, means better outcome. End of treatment means end of Visit 5 (Week 12) for Period 1 and end of Visit 10 (Week 12) for Period 2. Results were pooled for each 12 week period.
Part 2: Change From Baseline: CGI Symptom ScaleBaseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192Change from Baseline: CGI Symptom Scale by visit where Baseline= Part 1 Period 1 Pre-dose. Clinician Global Impression Scale: Clinician-reported overall health status at end of treatment, administered at Week 12 for Period 1 and Period 2. Scores range from 0-6 for both adolescents and adults. PGI Scale is as follows: 1= Very much Better, 2= Moderately Better, 3= A Little Better, 4= No Change, and 5= A Little Worse 6= Very much Worse. Change from baseline: higher score means worse health status, means worse outcome; lower score means better health status, means better outcome.
Part 2: Change From Baseline: SWAY Application Balance AssessmentBaseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96,168, 192Change from Baseline: SWAY Application Balance Assessment,where Baseline= Part 1 Period 1 Pre-doseSWAY application balance assessment consists of five stances each performed for 10 seconds and scores postural stability on a scale from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better postural stability. An increase from baseline is a better outcome and a decrease in score is a worse outcome.
Part 2: Distance Walked During the 6MWTBaseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 168, 192Change from baseline for distance walked in meters during the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) by visit where Baseline= Part 1 Period 1 Pre-dose

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Experimental: Elamipretide (Treatment AB)
Patients will be randomized to receive 12 weeks of elamipretide in one of the two treatment periods. All subjects will receive 12 weeks of elamipretide, 4 weeks of washout, and 12 weeks of placebo and 4 weeks of follow up (for those not continuing to Part 2). Elamipretide: 40 mg daily subcutaneous injection for 12 weeks Placebo: daily subcutaneous injection for 12 weeks
6
Experimental Placebo (Treatment BA)
Patients will be randomized to receive 12 weeks of placebo in one of the two treatment periods. All subjects will receive 12 weeks of placebo, 4 weeks of washout, and 12 weeks of elamipretide, and 4 weeks of follow up (for those not continuing to Part 2). Placebo: daily subcutaneous injection for 12 weeks Elamipretide: 40 mg daily subcutaneous injection for 12 weeks
6
Total12

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Part 2 Open Label ExtensionAdverse Event20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicExperimental: Elamipretide (Treatment AB)Experimental Placebo (Treatment BA)Total
Age, Continuous
Part 1
23.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.07
15.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.33
19.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.65
Age, Continuous
PART 2: OLE
21.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.23
16.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.42
19.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2
Body Mass Index
Part 1
18.23 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.677
16.88 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.179
17.56 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.818
Body Mass Index
Part 2 OLE
18.14 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.103
17.54 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.313
17.84 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.981
Race (NIH/OMB)
Part 1
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Part 1
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Part 1
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Part 1
More than one race
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Part 1
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Part 1
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Part 1
White
6 Participants5 Participants11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Part 2 (OLE)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Part 2 (OLE)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Part 2 (OLE)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Part 2 (OLE)
More than one race
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Part 2 (OLE)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Part 2 (OLE)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Part 2 (OLE)
White
5 Participants4 Participants9 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
6 participants6 participants12 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Part 1
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Part 1
Male
6 Participants6 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Part 2 (OLE)
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Part 2 (OLE)
Male
5 Participants5 Participants10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 50 / 50 / 60 / 6
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 55 / 512 / 1212 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 54 / 50 / 120 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Part 1: Distance Walked During the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) by Visit

Average distance walked in meters during the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) at end of treatment, where end of treatment means end of Visit 5 (Week 12) for Period 1 and end of Visit 10 (Week 12) for Period 2. Results were pooled for each 12 week period.

Time frame: Pre-dose to Week 12 (end of treatment)

Population: All participants for whom 6MWT was measured.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 1: Distance Walked During the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) by VisitPre-dose400.1 metersStandard Deviation 55.07
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 1: Distance Walked During the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) by VisitWeek 12 (End of Treatment443.1 metersStandard Deviation 65.43
PlaceboPart 1: Distance Walked During the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) by VisitPre-dose412.6 metersStandard Deviation 60.16
PlaceboPart 1: Distance Walked During the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) by VisitWeek 12 (End of Treatment443.9 metersStandard Deviation 77.1
Primary

Part 1: Total Fatigue Score Based on the BTHS-SA by Visit.

Total Fatigue Score (Q1, Q2, and Q4) Based on the BarTH Syndrome Symptom Assessment (BTHS-SA) by visit at predose, Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12 (end of treatment). The BTHS-SA is 3-question fatigue assessment using a 0 to 4-point scale for each question where no fatigue =0 and very severe fatigue =4, with scores from all 3 questions combined and averaged for all subjects; a lower score means better outcome, higher score means a worse outcome. Combined Min score=0, max score =12. Weekly values are based on the weekly average of the last 7 days before the site or visiting nurse visit for both periods. Results from each 12-week period were combined, where end of treatment for Period 1 =Visit 5 (week 12), and End of Period 2 = Visit 10 (week 12)

Time frame: Pre-dose, Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12 (end of treatment)

Population: All participants for whom Total Fatigue Score was measured

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 1: Total Fatigue Score Based on the BTHS-SA by Visit.Week 16.837 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1114
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 1: Total Fatigue Score Based on the BTHS-SA by Visit.Week 86.089 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8344
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 1: Total Fatigue Score Based on the BTHS-SA by Visit.Week 46.220 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3325
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 1: Total Fatigue Score Based on the BTHS-SA by Visit.Week 126.305 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.0612
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 1: Total Fatigue Score Based on the BTHS-SA by Visit.Pre-dose7.672 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.936
PlaceboPart 1: Total Fatigue Score Based on the BTHS-SA by Visit.Week 126.240 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6384
PlaceboPart 1: Total Fatigue Score Based on the BTHS-SA by Visit.Pre-dose7.433 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3848
PlaceboPart 1: Total Fatigue Score Based on the BTHS-SA by Visit.Week 16.994 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7093
PlaceboPart 1: Total Fatigue Score Based on the BTHS-SA by Visit.Week 46.485 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4447
PlaceboPart 1: Total Fatigue Score Based on the BTHS-SA by Visit.Week 86.196 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7815
Secondary

Part 1: 5XSST by Visit

Time (in seconds) to complete the Five Times Sit-To-Stand, where end of treatment means end of Visit 5 (Week 12) for Period 1 and end of Visit 10 (Week 12) for Period 2. Results were pooled for each 12 week period.

Time frame: Pre-dose to Week 12 (end of treatment)

Population: All participants for whom 5XSST was measured.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 1: 5XSST by VisitPre-dose12.965 secondsStandard Deviation 3.3366
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 1: 5XSST by VisitWeek 1214.023 secondsStandard Deviation 5.4508
PlaceboPart 1: 5XSST by VisitPre-dose13.710 secondsStandard Deviation 5.3088
PlaceboPart 1: 5XSST by VisitWeek 1213.749 secondsStandard Deviation 6.1024
Secondary

Part 1: Muscle Strength as Measured by HHD by Visit

Muscle strength as measured by handheld dynamometry (HHD) in Newtons, where end of treatment means end of Visit 5 (Week 12) for Period 1 and end of Visit 10 (Week 12) for Period 2. Results were pooled for each 12 week period. Handheld dynamometry assesses the average strength of the knee extensors of both legs.

Time frame: Pre-dose to Week 12 (end of treatment)

Population: All participants for whom muscle strength as measured by handheld dynamometry was measured.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 1: Muscle Strength as Measured by HHD by VisitPre-dose131.236 NewtonsStandard Deviation 29.9004
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 1: Muscle Strength as Measured by HHD by VisitWeek 12135.934 NewtonsStandard Deviation 52.2796
PlaceboPart 1: Muscle Strength as Measured by HHD by VisitWeek 12129.253 NewtonsStandard Deviation 34.2395
PlaceboPart 1: Muscle Strength as Measured by HHD by VisitPre-dose123.100 NewtonsStandard Deviation 24.6762
Secondary

Part 1: Part 1: Clinician Global Impression

Clinician Global Impression Scale by visit: Clinician-reported overall health status at end of treatment, administered at Week 12 for Period 1 and Period 2. Scores range from 0-6 for both adolescents and adults. PGI Scale is as follows: 1= Very much Better, 2= Moderately Better, 3= A Little Better, 4= No Change, and 5= A Little Worse 6= Very much Worse. Higher score means worse health status, means worse outcome; lower score means better health status, means better outcome. End of treatment means end of Visit 5 (Week 12) for Period 1 and end of Visit 10 (Week 12) for Period 2. Results were pooled for each 12 week period.

Time frame: Pre-dose to Week 12 (end of treatment)

Population: All participants for whom Patient Global Impression Scales of Symptoms was measured.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 1: Part 1: Clinician Global ImpressionPredose1.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.45
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 1: Part 1: Clinician Global Impression12 weeks1.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.51
PlaceboPart 1: Part 1: Clinician Global ImpressionPredose1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.51
PlaceboPart 1: Part 1: Clinician Global Impression12 weeks1.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.51
Secondary

Part 1: Patient Global Impression Scales of Symptoms

Patient-reported health status over the past week, by visit, where end of treatment means end of Visit 5 (Week 12) for Period 1 and end of Visit 10 (Week 12) for Period 2. Results were pooled for each 12 week period. Scores range from 0-40 for adolescents and 0-50 for adults. PGI Scale is as follows: 0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe, and 4=Very Severe. Higher score means worse health status, means worse outcome; lower score means better health status, means better outcome.

Time frame: Pre-dose, Week 1, Week 12 (end of treatment)

Population: All participants for whom Patient Global Impression Scales of Symptoms was measured.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 1: Patient Global Impression Scales of SymptomsPredose1.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.65
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 1: Patient Global Impression Scales of SymptomsWeek 11.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.89
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 1: Patient Global Impression Scales of SymptomsWeek 121.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.79
PlaceboPart 1: Patient Global Impression Scales of SymptomsPredose1.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83
PlaceboPart 1: Patient Global Impression Scales of SymptomsWeek 11.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
PlaceboPart 1: Patient Global Impression Scales of SymptomsWeek 121.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.67
Secondary

Part 1: SWAY Application Balance Assessments by Visit

SWAY application balance assessment consists of five stances each performed for 10 seconds and scores postural stability on a scale from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better postural stability from Pre-dose to Week 12 (end of treatment), where end of treatment means end of Visit 5 (Week 12) for Period 1 and end of Visit 10 (Week 12) for Period 2. Results were pooled for each 12 week period.

Time frame: Pre-dose to Week 12 (end of treatment)

Population: All participants for who SWAY application balance was measured.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 1: SWAY Application Balance Assessments by VisitPre-dose70.752 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.7199
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 1: SWAY Application Balance Assessments by VisitWeek 1278.698 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.1554
PlaceboPart 1: SWAY Application Balance Assessments by VisitPre-dose68.820 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.7478
PlaceboPart 1: SWAY Application Balance Assessments by VisitWeek 1271.353 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.2515
Secondary

Part 2: Change From Baseline: 5X Sit to Stand by Visit

Change in baseline in time (in seconds), where Baseline= Part 1 Period 1 Pre-dose to complete the Five Times Sit-To-Stand by visit. More time means worse outcome, less time means better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 168, 192

Population: All participants for whom 5X Sit to Stand was measured.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: 5X Sit to Stand by VisitWeek 72-4.770 secondsStandard Deviation 3.2043
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: 5X Sit to Stand by VisitEnd of Part 1-0.773 secondsStandard Deviation 2.5323
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: 5X Sit to Stand by VisitWeek 12-1.505 secondsStandard Deviation 2.1843
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: 5X Sit to Stand by VisitWeek 24-2.533 secondsStandard Deviation 2.7507
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: 5X Sit to Stand by VisitWeek 36-3.700 secondsStandard Deviation 3.7649
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: 5X Sit to Stand by VisitWeek 48-4.780 secondsStandard Deviation 2.982
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: 5X Sit to Stand by VisitWeek 96-8.060 seconds
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: 5X Sit to Stand by VisitWeek 168-4.320 secondsStandard Deviation 4.0307
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: 5X Sit to Stand by VisitWeek 192-6.850 seconds
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: 5X Sit to Stand by VisitWeek 192-0.390 secondsStandard Deviation 1.5839
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: 5X Sit to Stand by VisitWeek 48-0.082 secondsStandard Deviation 2.6625
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: 5X Sit to Stand by VisitEnd of Part 10.400 secondsStandard Deviation 2.7824
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: 5X Sit to Stand by VisitWeek 72-0.454 secondsStandard Deviation 1.6369
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: 5X Sit to Stand by VisitWeek 120.384 secondsStandard Deviation 3.7167
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: 5X Sit to Stand by VisitWeek 168-0.986 secondsStandard Deviation 2.1857
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: 5X Sit to Stand by VisitWeek 24-1.160 secondsStandard Deviation 2.8668
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: 5X Sit to Stand by VisitWeek 96-0.397 secondsStandard Deviation 3.6036
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: 5X Sit to Stand by VisitWeek 36-0.344 secondsStandard Deviation 2.7035
Secondary

Part 2: Change From Baseline: CGI Symptom Scale

Change from Baseline: CGI Symptom Scale by visit where Baseline= Part 1 Period 1 Pre-dose. Clinician Global Impression Scale: Clinician-reported overall health status at end of treatment, administered at Week 12 for Period 1 and Period 2. Scores range from 0-6 for both adolescents and adults. PGI Scale is as follows: 1= Very much Better, 2= Moderately Better, 3= A Little Better, 4= No Change, and 5= A Little Worse 6= Very much Worse. Change from baseline: higher score means worse health status, means worse outcome; lower score means better health status, means better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192

Population: All participants for whom Patient Global Impression Scales of Symptoms was measured.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: CGI Symptom ScaleWeek 96-1.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: CGI Symptom ScaleWeek 120-1.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: CGI Symptom ScaleWeek 144-1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: CGI Symptom ScaleWeek 168-1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: CGI Symptom ScaleWeek 192-1.0 score on a scale
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: CGI Symptom ScaleWeek 12-0.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.55
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: CGI Symptom ScaleWeek 24-1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.96
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: CGI Symptom ScaleWeek 36-1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: CGI Symptom ScaleWeek 48-1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: CGI Symptom ScaleWeek 72-1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: CGI Symptom ScaleWeek 36-0.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: CGI Symptom ScaleWeek 96-0.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: CGI Symptom ScaleWeek 120.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: CGI Symptom ScaleWeek 120-1.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: CGI Symptom ScaleWeek 72-0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.55
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: CGI Symptom ScaleWeek 144-0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.55
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: CGI Symptom ScaleWeek 24-0.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.55
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: CGI Symptom ScaleWeek 168-0.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: CGI Symptom ScaleWeek 48-0.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.55
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: CGI Symptom ScaleWeek 192-1.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Secondary

Part 2: Change From Baseline: Muscle Strength by HHD (Newtons) by Visit

Muscle strength as measured by handheld dynamometry (HHD) in Newtons. Handheld dynamometry assesses the average strength of the knee extensors of both legs. Change from baseline where Baseline= Part 1 Period 1 Pre-dose: the greater positive change, the better the outcome, the smaller positive change (or negative change) the number the worse the outcome.

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96,168, 192

Population: All participants for whom Muscle Strength by HHD (Newtons) was measured.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: Muscle Strength by HHD (Newtons) by VisitWeek 4869.613 NewtonsStandard Deviation 20.8788
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: Muscle Strength by HHD (Newtons) by VisitWeek 1233.606 NewtonsStandard Deviation 24.7304
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: Muscle Strength by HHD (Newtons) by VisitWeek 2454.073 NewtonsStandard Deviation 29.7699
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: Muscle Strength by HHD (Newtons) by VisitWeek 3668.798 NewtonsStandard Deviation 22.8892
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: Muscle Strength by HHD (Newtons) by VisitWeek 7262.089 NewtonsStandard Deviation 33.4753
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: Muscle Strength by HHD (Newtons) by VisitWeek 9693.745 Newtons
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: Muscle Strength by HHD (Newtons) by VisitWeek 16857.751 NewtonsStandard Deviation 17.7509
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: Muscle Strength by HHD (Newtons) by VisitWeek 19242.368 Newtons
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: Muscle Strength by HHD (Newtons) by VisitWeek 19232.140 NewtonsStandard Deviation 17.9287
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: Muscle Strength by HHD (Newtons) by VisitWeek 7232.071 NewtonsStandard Deviation 31.7087
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: Muscle Strength by HHD (Newtons) by VisitWeek 1242.147 NewtonsStandard Deviation 34.9498
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: Muscle Strength by HHD (Newtons) by VisitWeek 16861.897 NewtonsStandard Deviation 19.1573
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: Muscle Strength by HHD (Newtons) by VisitWeek 2454.068 NewtonsStandard Deviation 37.306
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: Muscle Strength by HHD (Newtons) by VisitWeek 9638.848 NewtonsStandard Deviation 18.1422
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: Muscle Strength by HHD (Newtons) by VisitWeek 3648.351 NewtonsStandard Deviation 31.1331
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: Muscle Strength by HHD (Newtons) by VisitWeek 4845.704 NewtonsStandard Deviation 56.8895
Secondary

Part 2: Change From Baseline: Patient Global Impression Scales of Symptoms by Visit

Part 2: Change from Baseline: Patient Global Impression Scales of Symptoms by Visit Patient-reported health status over the past week where Baseline= Part 1 Period 1 Pre-dose, administered at Week 12 for Period 1 and Period 2. Scores range from 0-40 for adolescents and 0-50 for adults. PGI Scale is as follows: 1=None, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe, and 5=Very Severe. Change from baseline: Higher score means worse health status, means worse outcome; lower score means better health status, means better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192

Population: All participants for whom Patient Global Impression Scales of Symptoms was measured.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: Patient Global Impression Scales of Symptoms by VisitWeek 36-0.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.15
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: Patient Global Impression Scales of Symptoms by VisitWeek 96-0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.12
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: Patient Global Impression Scales of Symptoms by VisitWeek 24-0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: Patient Global Impression Scales of Symptoms by VisitWeek 120-0.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.15
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: Patient Global Impression Scales of Symptoms by VisitWeek 48-0.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.15
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: Patient Global Impression Scales of Symptoms by VisitWeek 144-1.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.41
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: Patient Global Impression Scales of Symptoms by VisitWeek 12-0.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: Patient Global Impression Scales of Symptoms by VisitWeek 168-0.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.15
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: Patient Global Impression Scales of Symptoms by VisitWeek 72-0.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.15
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: Patient Global Impression Scales of Symptoms by VisitWeek 192-2.0 score on a scale
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: Patient Global Impression Scales of Symptoms by VisitEnd of Part 10.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: Patient Global Impression Scales of Symptoms by VisitWeek 192-0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: Patient Global Impression Scales of Symptoms by VisitEnd of Part 1-0.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.55
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: Patient Global Impression Scales of Symptoms by VisitWeek 12-0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.55
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: Patient Global Impression Scales of Symptoms by VisitWeek 24-0.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.55
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: Patient Global Impression Scales of Symptoms by VisitWeek 36-0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.55
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: Patient Global Impression Scales of Symptoms by VisitWeek 480.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: Patient Global Impression Scales of Symptoms by VisitWeek 72-0.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.55
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: Patient Global Impression Scales of Symptoms by VisitWeek 96-0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: Patient Global Impression Scales of Symptoms by VisitWeek 120-0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.55
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: Patient Global Impression Scales of Symptoms by VisitWeek 144-0.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.45
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: Patient Global Impression Scales of Symptoms by VisitWeek 168-0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.55
Secondary

Part 2: Change From Baseline: SWAY Application Balance Assessment

Change from Baseline: SWAY Application Balance Assessment,where Baseline= Part 1 Period 1 Pre-doseSWAY application balance assessment consists of five stances each performed for 10 seconds and scores postural stability on a scale from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better postural stability. An increase from baseline is a better outcome and a decrease in score is a worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96,168, 192

Population: All participants for whom SWAY Application Balance Assessment was measured.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: SWAY Application Balance AssessmentWeek 12-3.152 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.8419
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: SWAY Application Balance AssessmentWeek 2412.190 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.6799
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: SWAY Application Balance AssessmentWeek 360.807 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.9493
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: SWAY Application Balance AssessmentWeek 485.773 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8814
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: SWAY Application Balance AssessmentWeek 7210.420 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7501
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: SWAY Application Balance AssessmentWeek 9612.840 score on a scale
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: SWAY Application Balance AssessmentWeek 16821.127 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.1854
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: SWAY Application Balance AssessmentWeek 19215.100 score on a scale
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: SWAY Application Balance AssessmentWeek 19213.080 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.3483
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: SWAY Application Balance AssessmentWeek 1210.464 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.1971
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: SWAY Application Balance AssessmentWeek 7215.240 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.3557
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: SWAY Application Balance AssessmentWeek 246.664 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.5896
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: SWAY Application Balance AssessmentWeek 16819.644 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.6821
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: SWAY Application Balance AssessmentWeek 369.484 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.3834
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: SWAY Application Balance AssessmentWeek 9618.433 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.3323
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: SWAY Application Balance AssessmentWeek 4815.260 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.254
Secondary

Part 2: Change From Baseline: Total Fatigue Score (Q1, Q2, and Q4) Based on the BTHS-SA by Visit

Change from Baseline (mean) in Total Fatigue Score (Q1, Q2, and Q4) Based on the BarTH Syndrome Symptom Assessment (BTHS-SA) by visit. The BTHS-SA is 3-question fatigue assessment using a 0-4 point scale for each question where no fatigue =0 and very severe fatigue =4, with scores from all 3 questions combined and averaged for all subjects by visit; a lower score means better outcome, higher score means a worse outcome. Change from baseline: an increase in scores would mean worse outcome, a decrease in scores means better outcome. Combined Min score=-12, max score =12. Weekly values are based on the weekly average of the last 7 days before the site or visiting nurse visit for both periods. Baseline= Period 1 Predose.

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192

Population: All participants for whom Total Fatigue Score was measured.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: Total Fatigue Score (Q1, Q2, and Q4) Based on the BTHS-SA by VisitWeek 192-5.286 score on a scale
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: Total Fatigue Score (Q1, Q2, and Q4) Based on the BTHS-SA by VisitWeek 24-1.500 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.0253
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: Total Fatigue Score (Q1, Q2, and Q4) Based on the BTHS-SA by VisitWeek 168-2.333 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.0515
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: Total Fatigue Score (Q1, Q2, and Q4) Based on the BTHS-SA by VisitWeek 36-2.667 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6821
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: Total Fatigue Score (Q1, Q2, and Q4) Based on the BTHS-SA by VisitBaseline-2.425 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.0849
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: Total Fatigue Score (Q1, Q2, and Q4) Based on the BTHS-SA by VisitWeek 48-1.000 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9172
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: Total Fatigue Score (Q1, Q2, and Q4) Based on the BTHS-SA by VisitWeek 144-2.667 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2961
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: Total Fatigue Score (Q1, Q2, and Q4) Based on the BTHS-SA by VisitWeek 72-2.667 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.4827
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: Total Fatigue Score (Q1, Q2, and Q4) Based on the BTHS-SA by VisitWeek 12-1.800 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4838
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: Total Fatigue Score (Q1, Q2, and Q4) Based on the BTHS-SA by VisitWeek 96-3.500 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5254
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Change From Baseline: Total Fatigue Score (Q1, Q2, and Q4) Based on the BTHS-SA by VisitWeek 120-3.000 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9172
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: Total Fatigue Score (Q1, Q2, and Q4) Based on the BTHS-SA by VisitWeek 96-0.357 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5763
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: Total Fatigue Score (Q1, Q2, and Q4) Based on the BTHS-SA by VisitWeek 120-0.114 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0309
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: Total Fatigue Score (Q1, Q2, and Q4) Based on the BTHS-SA by VisitWeek 144-0.314 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.0067
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: Total Fatigue Score (Q1, Q2, and Q4) Based on the BTHS-SA by VisitWeek 168-0.514 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7309
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: Total Fatigue Score (Q1, Q2, and Q4) Based on the BTHS-SA by VisitWeek 192-1.107 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5556
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: Total Fatigue Score (Q1, Q2, and Q4) Based on the BTHS-SA by VisitBaseline-1.540 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3653
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: Total Fatigue Score (Q1, Q2, and Q4) Based on the BTHS-SA by VisitWeek 12-1.314 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4237
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: Total Fatigue Score (Q1, Q2, and Q4) Based on the BTHS-SA by VisitWeek 24-0.314 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0816
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: Total Fatigue Score (Q1, Q2, and Q4) Based on the BTHS-SA by VisitWeek 36-1.714 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0583
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: Total Fatigue Score (Q1, Q2, and Q4) Based on the BTHS-SA by VisitWeek 48-0.314 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.065
PlaceboPart 2: Change From Baseline: Total Fatigue Score (Q1, Q2, and Q4) Based on the BTHS-SA by VisitWeek 72-1.114 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1301
Secondary

Part 2: Distance Walked During the 6MWT

Change from baseline for distance walked in meters during the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) by visit where Baseline= Part 1 Period 1 Pre-dose

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 168, 192

Population: All participants for whom distance walked in 6MWT was measured.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Distance Walked During the 6MWTPart 2: Week 1245.4 metersStandard Deviation 55.73
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Distance Walked During the 6MWTPart 2: Week 2479.8 metersStandard Deviation 23.54
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Distance Walked During the 6MWTPart 2: Week 3668.0 metersStandard Deviation 31.19
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Distance Walked During the 6MWTPart 2: Week 4887.3 metersStandard Deviation 25.58
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Distance Walked During the 6MWTPart 2: Week 72121.7 metersStandard Deviation 20.74
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Distance Walked During the 6MWTPart 2: Week 96128.0 meters
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Distance Walked During the 6MWTPart 2: Week 16889.3 metersStandard Deviation 32.75
Experimental: ElamipretidePart 2: Distance Walked During the 6MWTPart 2: Week 192118.0 meters
PlaceboPart 2: Distance Walked During the 6MWTPart 2: Week 192125.0 metersStandard Deviation 28.28
PlaceboPart 2: Distance Walked During the 6MWTPart 2: Week 1275.6 metersStandard Deviation 87.25
PlaceboPart 2: Distance Walked During the 6MWTPart 2: Week 7297.8 metersStandard Deviation 117.53
PlaceboPart 2: Distance Walked During the 6MWTPart 2: Week 24100.4 metersStandard Deviation 94.61
PlaceboPart 2: Distance Walked During the 6MWTPart 2: Week 168100.2 metersStandard Deviation 78.1
PlaceboPart 2: Distance Walked During the 6MWTPart 2: Week 36112.6 metersStandard Deviation 119.35
PlaceboPart 2: Distance Walked During the 6MWTPart 2: Week 9663.7 metersStandard Deviation 69.14
PlaceboPart 2: Distance Walked During the 6MWTPart 2: Week 48103.4 metersStandard Deviation 102.02

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026