Skip to content

Is the Walking Velocity an Efficient Outcome of Rehabilitation Program in Non- Specific Low Back Pain Patient

Is the Walking Velocity an Efficient Outcome of Rehabilitation Program in Non- Specific Low Back Pain Patient

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03097263
Acronym
MARLO
Enrollment
127
Registered
2017-03-31
Start date
2014-01-31
Completion date
2016-11-30
Last updated
2017-03-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Functional Capacities, Non-specific Low Back Pain

Brief summary

Despite the prevalence of chronic low back pain, functional symptomatology of this disease remains poor and treatment decisions are based mainly on subjective data (importance and pain tolerance). However, there are some experimental elements that involve objective assessment of locomotor capabilities - at forefront objectives which the walking velocity in the evaluation of this pathology in terms of severity of functional impairment. Recent evidence suggest the effectiveness of physical rehabilitation program for improving patients functional capacities and their reintegration in socio-professional life. This retrospective study aims to quantify the evolution of the parameters collected during standardized walking tests performed before and after rehabilitation program. These patients have systematically carry out a comfortable walk test (400m walk test) and a brisk walk test (200m) at the beginning and end of their program. Furthermore, a maximal stress test on a treadmill was performed before the program in order to detect any cardiovascular events and to allow the personalization of the effort level required (target heart rate) during rehabilitation. In this study the evolution of the comfortable and fast speed will be collected and compared with the stress test data, and other measured parameters (functional score of Quebec, muscle Tests Shirado and Sorensen).

Interventions

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female or male * age between 18 and 70 * Non-specific low back pain - achieved rehabilitation program

Exclusion criteria

* inflammatory diseases * cancer * infectious diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
COMFORTABLE WALKING SPEED (TEST OF 400M)4 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
200m fast walk test walking velocity4 weeks
Quebec score4 weeks
Shirado test4 weeks
Sorensen test4 weeks

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026