Skip to content

Polyamine-enriched Diet in Elderly Individuals With Subjective Cognitive Decline

Effect of Polyamine-enriched Dietary Supplementation on Cognitive Function and Biomarkers in Elderly Individuals With Subjective Cognitive Decline

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03094546
Acronym
SmartAge
Enrollment
100
Registered
2017-03-29
Start date
2017-01-31
Completion date
2020-10-31
Last updated
2021-04-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD)

Keywords

subjective cognitive decline, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, dietary supplement, polyamine, prevention, treatment, lifestyle, memory, autophagy

Brief summary

The overall objective of this study is to examine the effect of polyamine supplementation on cognitive performance and further characterization of individuals with subjective cognitive decline.

Detailed description

Memory abilities are known to decline during aging, a process that is accelerated in pathological conditions like mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD), all of which are a growing public-health concern with devastating social and economical effects. Polyamines supplementation and corresponding up-regulation of autophagy (i.e., cellular protein degradation pathways) may be a key target of intervention against age-related memory decline. The study will investigate whether a polyamine-enriched dietary supplementation (through capsule intake) could provide positive effects on cognitive function and biomarkers of elderly individuals (60-90 years old) with subjective cognitive decline (SCD).

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTPolyamine

12 months of polyamine supplementation (6 capsules/day)

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTPlacebo

12 months of placebo intake (6 capsules/day)

Sponsors

Freie Universität, Institute of Biology/Genetic, Berlin, Germany
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Karl-Franzens-Universität, Institute of Molecular Biosciences, Graz, Austria
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Cognitive healthy individuals with subjective memory decline and self-reported concerns * 60-90 years old * No manifest dementia (DSM-IV criteria) * No limitations in activities of daily living * Capacity for consent

Exclusion criteria

* Gluten, histamine or wheat seedling intolerance * Severe neurological, internal or psychological diseases * Advanced heart or respiratory diseases, severe arteriosclerosis, untreated thyroid disease or diabetes * Malignant tumors, current or past history * Brain tumors, stroke * Disorders that impair attention * Dementia * Coagulation disorder, Marcumar * Drug abuse or alcohol dependency * Current polyamine substitution

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Memory performance from neuropsychological testchange from baseline after 12 month (Prior to intervention (baseline T0) and after 12 months)Comparing memory function in subjects with polyamine intake and placebo treatment assessed prior to intervention (pre) vs. 12 month post intervention

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Cognitive Function (from extended neuropsychological test battery)change from baseline after 12 monthComparing cognitive function in subjects with polyamine intake and placebo treatment assessed prior to intervention (pre) vs. 12 month post intervention
Change in polyamine concentrationchange from baseline after 12 monthcomparing polyamine concentration derived from blood plasma assessed prior to intervention (pre) vs. 12 month post intervention
Change in inflammationchange from baseline after 12 monthcomparing inflammation markers derived from blood plasma assessed prior to intervention (pre) vs. 12 month post intervention
Change in Brain imaging biomarkerschange from baseline after 12 monthMultimodal analysis of biomarkers, regarding structural, functional, and perfusion-related plasticity, derived from magnet resonance imaging
Change in Autophagy processeschange from baseline after 12 monthEvaluate autophagy processes through muscle biopsy assessed prior to intervention (pre) vs. 12 month post intervention

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026