Skip to content

Robot-assisted Esophagectomy Versus Conventional Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy

Robot-assisted Esophagectomy Versus Conventional Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy for Patients With Squamous Cell Esophageal Cancer: a Multicenter Open-label, Randomized Controlled Trial (RAMIE Trial)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03094351
Acronym
RAE vs CTE
Enrollment
360
Registered
2017-03-29
Start date
2017-07-29
Completion date
2024-12-01
Last updated
2020-02-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Esophageal Cancer, Esophageal Carcinoma

Keywords

robot assisted esophagectomy, minimally invasive esophagectomy, esophageal cancer

Brief summary

This is the first randomized controlled study to compare the robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) to minimally invasive conventional thoracoscopic esophagectomy (CTE). The aim of this trial is to evaluate the safety, risks of the robot-assisted esophagectomy, and to compare the short-term operative outcomes and long-term oncological outcomes between the two surgical treatments.

Detailed description

Objective: This study aims to compare the oncological outcomes between robot-assisted esophagectomy and minimally invasive conventional thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Study design: Randomized controlled parallel-group superiority trial Study population: Patients (age \>= 18 and \<= 75 years) with histologically proven surgically resectable (cT1b-3, N0-2, M0) squamous cell carcinoma of the intrathoracic esophagus with European Clinical Oncology Group performance status 0, 1 or 2. Intervention: 360 patients will be randomly allocated to either A) robot-assisted esophagectomy (n=180) or B) conventional thoracoscopic esophagectomy (n=180). Patients will receive the following interventions: Group A. robot assisted esophagectomy, with gastric conduit formation. Group B. conventional thoracoscopic esophagectomy, with gastric conduit formation. Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary outcome is 5-year overall survival rate. Secondary outcomes are 5-year disease free survival, 3-year overall survival rate, 3-year disease free survival, (in hospital) mortality within 30 and 60 days, R0 resections, operation related events, postoperative recovery, lymph nodes status, quality of life. Follow-up: 60 months after discharge of the last randomized patient.

Interventions

PROCEDUREesophagectomy

Robot assisted esophagectomy with extended two field lymphadenectomy.

Sponsors

Ruijin Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Changhai Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
CollaboratorOTHER
Shanghai Chest Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Open Label

Intervention model description

Parallel Assignment

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma of the intrathoracic esophagus. * Surgical resectable (T1b-3, N0-2, M0) * Age ≥ 18 and ≤ 75 years * European Clinical Oncology Group performance status 0, 1 or 2 * Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Carcinoma of the cervical esophagus * Histologically proven adenocarcinoma or undifferentiated carcinoma. * Prior thoracic surgery at the right hemithorax or thorax trauma. * Infectious disease with systemic therapy indicated.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Overall Survival Rate5 years

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival Rate3 years
Disease Free Survival Rate3 years
Postoperative major complications30 days after surgery
In hospital mortality30-60 days after surgeryFor all patients, the cause of death will be noted. If applicable, the results of the autopsy report will be noted.
R0 resection (%)within 30 days after surgery
Postoperative recoveryfrom the date of surgery to the hospital discharge, assessed up to 15 daysPostoperative hospital stay, intensive care unit (ICU) stay
Number of lymph nodes dissectedwithin 30 days after surgery
Quality of life2 yearsThe quality of life assessment was based on a previously validated questionnaire, QLQ-C30 (version 3.0; quality-of-life questionnaire), combined with an esophageal cancer-specific module, QLQ-OES18.
Estimated blood lossduring the operation, up to 5 hours
Operative durationduring the operation, up to 5 hoursThe operation time is defined as time from incision until closure (minutes) for both the thoracic phase and the abdominal phase of the procedure. For the robotic procedure, the set-up time will be recorded separately.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactZhigang Li, Master
zhigang.li@shchest.org86-18930619260
Backup ContactXiaobin Zhang, Doctor
zxb5212@163.com86-18516302162

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 24, 2026