Skip to content

8mm-TIPS Versus Endoscopic Variceal Ligation (EVL) Plus Propranolol for Prevention of Variceal Rebleeding in Patients With Child A Cirrhosis

8mm-TIPS Versus Endoscopic Variceal Ligation (EVL) Plus Propranolol for Prevention of Variceal Rebleeding in Patients With Child A Cirrhosis

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03094234
Enrollment
72
Registered
2017-03-29
Start date
2017-04-28
Completion date
2022-03-28
Last updated
2021-11-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Portal Hypertension

Brief summary

The aim of this study was to conduct a prospective randomized trial to compare TIPS with 8mm expanded polytetrafluoroethylene(ePTFE)-covered stents and endoscopic variceal ligation plus propranolol for the prevention of recurrent esophageal variceal bleeding in patients with Child A cirrhosis

Detailed description

For the prevention of recurrent esophageal variceal bleeding, previous clinical studies and meta-analysis show that patients treated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) have lower rebleeding rates compared with endoscopic therapy. However, TIPS is associated with higher rates of portosystemic encephalopathy and does not show survival benefit. TIPS with a small-diameter may achieve sufficient portal decompression and reduce the incidence of hepatic encephalopathy. The aim of this study was to conduct a prospective randomized trial to compare TIPS with 8mm ePTFE-covered stents and endoscopic variceal ligation plus propranolol for the prevention of recurrent esophageal variceal bleeding.

Interventions

DEVICE8mm-TIPS

Patients in this group would underwent TIPS placement with 8mm-diameter ePTFE-covered stents.

Patients in this group would underwent sequential endoscopic variceal ligation and propranolol treatment.

DRUGPropranolol

Appropriate dose of propranolol was administered to the patients.

Sponsors

West China Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Cirrhosis Patients who had bled from esophageal varices (≥5days and ≤28days) Child-Pugh A -

Exclusion criteria

The presence of gastric varices Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension Portal vein thrombosis The history of hepatic encephalopathy Total bilirubin ≥51.3 umol/L Previous treatment of TIPS or surgery Proven malignancy including hepatocellular carcinoma Contraindications to TIPS、EVL or propranolol End-stage renal disease under renal replacement therapy; Cardiorespiratory failure Pregnancy or patients not giving informed consent for endoscopic procedure \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Variceal rebleeding rate3 yearsAnalysis

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hepatic encephalopathy rate3 yearsAnalysis
TIPS dysfunction rate3 yearsAnalysis
The incidence of complications3 yearsAnalysis
Mortality rate3 yearsAnalysis

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026