Skip to content

Cognitive Training Intervention and Attitudes Towards Genetics

Intervention Strategies to Improve Cognitive Functioning in Hematologic Cancer Survivors After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03094026
Acronym
cTAG
Enrollment
60
Registered
2017-03-29
Start date
2017-08-21
Completion date
2027-07-01
Last updated
2026-04-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cognitive Impairment, Hematologic Neoplasms, Hematopoietic Cell Transplant

Keywords

Hematologic cancers, Hematopoietic cell transplantation, cognitive training, genetic knowledge, genetic attitude, adult cancer survivors

Brief summary

A pilot study to evaluate feasibility of enrollment of patients in an intervention to improve neurocognitive function in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) survivors using the cognitive training Lumosity program. In addition, patients' interest in receiving information regarding genetic risk of cognitive impairment post-HCT will be measured.

Detailed description

The investigators propose using an "off-the-shelf" product - Lumosity (http://www.lumosity.com/) - an online cognitive training program, to address the cognitive impairment in outpatient HCT survivors. The program offers over 60 tasks in game-like format that cover the main cognitive domains: processing speed, working memory, and executive function. Training will involve a daily session of 5 training tasks for 12 weeks. Each time the patient is logged in for a session, a customized report will be generated by the Lumosity program to capture performance information. Ideally, targeting the intervention and offering it specifically to those at highest risk (integrating clinical and genetic markers) would ensure efficacy. However, evidence is lacking on whether patients are receptive to communication of individual genetic information and whether provision of such results would lead to enhanced intervention response. To realize the high expectations of personalized medicine, patients' preferences and attitudes need to be thoroughly investigated especially as more information on genetic risk becomes available. The investigators will examine patients' genetic knowledge to determine whether factual knowledge of genetics is essential for understanding genetic risk and for informing treatment decision making in this patient population.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALLumosity

Computer-based online cognitive training program using the Lumosity cognitive training program.

BEHAVIORALLumosity (waitlist control)

Computer-based online cognitive training program using the Lumosity cognitive training program. The control group will receive the intervention after a waiting period of 12 weeks.

Sponsors

University of Alabama at Birmingham
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ≥ 21 years old at time of allogeneic HCT performed at UAB * Outpatient and between 3 and 6 months post HCT * English speaking * Possess access to an internet-connected home computer

Exclusion criteria

* History of pre-existing neurological disorder or documented major psychiatric disorder; significant auditory, visual, or motor impairments * Participated in neuropsychological intervention within the past 6 months * History of color blindness

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of HCT patients completing the 2-arm wait-listed randomized trial of cognitive training intervention for a period of 3 months12 weeksNumber of participants completing the 12 week intervention
Change in cognitive function between intervention and wait list control arms from baseline to 12 weeks.Baseline to 12 weeksChange in cognitive function will be measured using cognitive test scores at baseline and 12 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
16-item survey to measure genetic factual knowledge at baselineBaselineGenetic factual knowledge will be measured using a 16-item survey on knowledge about genes, chromosomes, cells, and diseases and how different characteristics are inherited from parents.
Effect size of associations of key predictors with genetic factual knowledge at baselineBaselineEffect size of associations of sociodemographic characteristics such as age, gender, race/ethnicity, education and income levels with genetic factual knowledge of participants will be measured.
5 Likert scale survey questionnaire to measure importance of receiving genetic risk informationbaselinePatient ratings will be collected on a 5 Likert scale survey questionnaire to examine importance of receiving information on genetic risk of cognitive impairment post-HCT.
5 Likert scale survey questionnaire to measure impact of receiving genetic risk information on intervention uptakebaselinePatient ratings will be collected on a 5 Likert scale survey questionnaire to measure association of likelihood of genetic risk of cognitive impairment (low chance vs high chance) on intervention uptake.
5 Likert scale survey questionnaire to measure impact of receiving genetic risk information on intervention adherencebaselinePatient ratings will be collected on a 5 Likert scale survey questionnaire to measure association of likelihood of genetic risk of cognitive impairment (low chance vs high chance) on intervention adherence.

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTNoha M Sharafeldin, MD,MSc, PhD
nsharaf@uab.edu2056382144
CONTACTLindsey Hageman, MPH
lhageman@peds.uab.edu2056382139
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORNoha M Sharafeldin

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 21, 2026