Skip to content

Evaluation of Fluid Output Threshold for Safe Chest Tube Removal - A Potential Way to Decrease Length of Stay in Hospital and to Improve Postoperative Care After Lung Surgery?

Evaluation of Fluid Output Threshold for Safe Chest Tube Removal - A Potential Way to Decrease Length of Stay in Hospital and to Improve Postoperative Care After Lung Surgery?

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03093610
Enrollment
337
Registered
2017-03-28
Start date
2019-05-31
Completion date
2022-03-30
Last updated
2022-12-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pleural Effusion Recurrence, Pulmonary Resection, Chest Tube Management

Brief summary

Previous studies have shown that the removal of the chest tube after lung surgery significantly improves pain symptoms and lung function. The criteria for chest tube removal still remain vague in modern thoracic surgery and rely on personal experience instead of evidence-based criteria. Every hospital has its own traditional standard fluid threshold and believes in that without adapting and comparing it not even after introduction of newer and more minimal-invasive operation technique. According to literature the traditional fluid threshold is varying from 100 to 500 or even more millilitre in 24 hours. Since pleural fluid resorption is proportional to body weight the investigators believe that a body weight related approach of chest tube management would improve safety and would allow an earlier chest tube removal without a higher rate of complication. In this way the investigators believe in improving pain management and in achieving earlier discharge of the patient.

Interventions

PROCEDURETraditional

Removal of the chest tube after air leakage has ceased and fluid drainage is 200ml/24h or less.

PROCEDURETest

Removal of the chest tube after air leakage has ceased and fluid drainage is 5ml/kg/24h or less.

Sponsors

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Caregiver)

Masking description

The operating surgeon does not know to which group the Patient will be attributed to.

Intervention model description

Group 1: Removal of the chest tube after air leakage has ceased and fluid Drainage is \< 200ml/24h Group 2: Removal of the chest tube after air leakage has ceased and fluid Drainage is \< 5ml/kg/24h

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Lobectomy/ Bilobectomy * Segmentectomy * Signed consent * Age of majority

Exclusion criteria

* Pneumonectomy * Atypical resections * Empyema * Pleural effusion (not related to surgery) * Pleurodesis * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of recurrent pleural effusions after chest tube removalup to 6 weeks postoperativeEvaluation of recurrent pleural effusion after chest tube removal
Pain scores (VAS-Score)postoperative Period until 3 hours after Chest tube removalEvaluation of Pain Scores after Chest tube removal
Time Point of chest tube removalPostoperative, expected to be up to 1 week after surgerypostoperative day of chest tube removal

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient dischargeAt time of discharge, on average 4-7 daysTime Point of Patient discharge

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026