Skip to content

Omega-3 Plus Low-dose Aspirin Daily Supplementation in Non-surgical Therapy to Treat Aggressive Periodontitis

Evaluation of Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids Plus Low-dose Aspirin Daily Supplementation in Non-surgical Therapy to Treat Generalized Aggressive Periodontitis: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03093246
Enrollment
38
Registered
2017-03-28
Start date
2017-05-15
Completion date
2019-12-13
Last updated
2021-12-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aggressive Periodontitis

Keywords

Full-mouth ultrasonic debridement, Aspirin, Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, Non-surgical therapy

Brief summary

The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial of superiority will be to evaluate the effect of 3 g of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and 100 mg of aspirin daily supplementation over a period of 180 days as adjunct to non-surgical therapY of patients with generalized aggressive periodontitis. Probing depth, clinical attachment level, gingival index and concentration of microorganisms and cytokines at baseline, 3, and 6 12 months after the procedure will be evaluated.

Detailed description

The study methodology is according to CONSORT-STATEMENT 2010 for randomized controlled clinical trials. Study Design The study is designed as a prospective, interventional, parallel, blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial of superiority. Source of data The population of this study will be recruited among patients referred to the Science and Technology Institute - ICT- São José dos Campos, College of Dentistry. Patients will fill a healthy history questionnaire to ensure that they are medically qualified for participate in this study. Based on the power calculation for this study, a population of 38 patients will be included. Considering α of 5% and 10% β-type error (90% power) to detect a difference of at least 1 mm in probing depth reduction of pockets ≥ 5 mm between groups, for a standard deviation of 0.94 from a previous study evaluating different antimicrobials in the treatment of GAgP (Xajigeorgiou et al., 2006), 19 patients will be needed in each group. Clinical Parameters All clinical parameters will be assessed by a single blinded, trained and calibrated examiner (CFA) before periodontal therapy (baseline) and at 3 and 6 months after using a manual probe. Measurements will be done at six sites per tooth (mesiobuccal, buccal, disto-buccal, distolingual, lingual, and mesiolingual) in all teeth, except third molars. The following clinical parameters will be evaluated: 1) Full-mouth plaque index (FMPI); 2) Bleeding on probing (BoP); 3) Probing depth (PD): distance from the bottom of sulcus/pocket to gingival margin; 4) Gingival recession (GM): distance from the free gingival margin to cement-enamel junction (CEJ); 5) Clinical attachment level (CAL): distance from bottom of sulcus/pocket to the CEJ. The CEJ will be identified by careful probe on cervical area. Calibration and Randomization Initially, a total of ten patients presenting with GAgP will be selected. The designated examiner (CFA) will measure CAL and PD in all patients twice within 24 hours, with an interval of ≥ 1 hour between examinations. Then, the measures will be submitted to intraclass correlation test and the examiner will be judged calibrated if reaches 90% agreement. Patients will be allocated into two groups according to a computer-generated list. The allocation will be implemented by an investigator (NC) who was not directly involved in the examination or treatment procedures. Treatment Protocols All patients will be treated with periodontal therapy through of the one-stage, full mouth, ultrasonic debridement (FMUD). In a single session, patients will receive local anesthesia and periodontal debridement with ultrasound equipment (Cavitron - Dentsply EUA) and subgingival tips (UI25KSF10S, Hu-Friedy). All diseased sites will be instrumented in this one session. The debridement session will be performed by a single experienced and trained periodontist (NA), different from the examiner. Immediately before the mechanical therapy, patients will be allocated in one of the two treatment protocols: Test group (n = 19): FMUD + 3 g of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and 100 mg of aspirin daily supplementation over a period of 180 days; Control group (n = 19): FMUD + placebo pills. All patients will start taking the pills immediately before of the FMUD session. Microbiological evaluation Subgingival microbiological samples will be collected at the baseline, 3 and 6 months after therapy. The site will be isolated with a sterile cotton roller and supragingival biofilm will be carefully removed with periodontal curettes and a sterile paper will be inserted into the periodontal pocket for 30 s (Hartoth et al., 1999). The sample will be stored in sterile microtubes. The samples will then be lyophilized and sent to the Department of Periodontology at the University of Florida, where the samples will be analyzed. Evaluation of cytokines For the analysis of immunological changes, crevicular gingival fluid (CGF) will be collected at baseline, 3 and 6 months after treatment. Each site will be isolated with a sterile cotton roller and the supragingival biofilm will be removed. After this, the CGF will be collected with Periopaper strips (Periopaper, Oraflow, Plainview, NY, USA), inserted in the pocket for 15 seconds. The volume of collected fluid will be measured (Periotron 8000, Oraflow). The Periopaper strips will be stored in a sterile tube containing 300μl of phosphate saline (PBS) with 5% Tween-20 and stored in a freezer at -20 ° C until the multiplex test. The level of the following cytokines will be measured in the CGF: interferon (IFN) -γ, interleukins (IL) -10, -1β, -4, -6, -8, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) -α, macrophage inflammatory protein 1α (MIP1α), 1α monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP-1α). The 10-plex high sensitivity kit (Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) will be used according to the manufacturer's instruction and analyzed using the MAGpixTM platform (MiraiBio, Alameda, CA, USA). Samples will be analyzed individually (each pocket separately) and the concentrations will be calculated using a standard 5-parameter curve in the Xponet program (Millipore Corporation). The concentration of each marker will be given in pg / ml. All analysis of cytokine concentrations will be done in duplicate. Statistical analysis Two analyzes will be performed: Per Protocol and Intention-to-treat (Moher, 2010; Gupta, 2011; Day, 2008). For each of them, mean and standard deviation will be calculated in each of the parameters. Full-mouth PI, GI, PD, CAL, and GR will be submitted to the Shapiro-Wilk test to evaluate the distribution of these data, and then subjected to the variance test for both intra- and intra-group comparison. In addition, the number of pockets ≥ 5mm, the frequency of closure of these pockets, the mean reduction in PS and the gain in CAL of these pockets will be assessed before and after the therapy by performing intra- and inter-group analyzes. The concentration of each cytokine will be analyzed by test of variance for intra and intergroup comparison.

Interventions

3 g of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids daily supplementation over a period of 180 days

DRUGAspirin

100 mg of aspirin daily supplementation over a period of 180 days

OTHERPlacebo

Placebo pills over a period of 180 days

Full-mouth ultrasonic debridement will be performed in order to treat diseased sites

Sponsors

Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* diagnosis of GAgP (AAP, 1999); * presence of ≥20 teeth; * presence of ≥ 6 sites presenting PD ≥ 5mm with bleeding on probing (BOP) and ≥2 sites with PD ≥7mm (including incisors and first molars, in addition to other two non-contiguous teeth); * good general health; * agree to participate in the study and sign a written informed consent. All subjects will be individually informed about the objectives, probable risks and benefits of the protocol treatment (according to Resolution nº196 of October 1996 and to the Professional Code of Dental Ethics - 179/93).

Exclusion criteria

* pregnancy or lactating; * suffer from any systemic disease (e.g. cardiovascular disorders, diabetes, blood dyscrasias, immunodeficiency, etc) which could alter the course of periodontal disease; * took antimicrobials in the previous 6 months; * taking long-term anti-inflammatory drugs; * previous periodontal treatment within the last 12 months; * smoker ≥ 10 cigarettes.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Probing DepthBaseline, 3 and 6 monthsEvaluate the difference between baseline and 6 months PD measures.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Bleeding on ProbeBaseline, 3 and 6 monthsEvaluate the difference between baseline and 6 months BoP measures
Change in Clinical Attachment LevelBaseline, 3 and 6 monthsEvaluate the difference between baseline and 6 months CAL measures.

Countries

Brazil

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Control Group
In this group (n = 19), patients received placebo pills over a period of 180 days and full-mouth ultrasonic debridement was performed to treat diseased sites.
19
Test Group
In this group (n = 19), patients received 900 mg of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and 100 mg of aspirin daily over a period of 180 days and full-mouth ultrasonic debridement was performed to treat diseased sites.
19
Total38

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTest GroupTotalControl Group
Age, Continuous32.84 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.47
31.63 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6
30.42 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.79
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
19 Participants38 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants26 Participants14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants12 Participants5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 190 / 19
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 190 / 19
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 190 / 19

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Probing Depth

Evaluate the difference between baseline and 6 months PD measures.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 and 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control GroupChange in Probing Depth3 months3.38 milimetersStandard Deviation 0.14
Control GroupChange in Probing Depth6 months3.37 milimetersStandard Deviation 0.14
Control GroupChange in Probing DepthBaseline3.88 milimetersStandard Deviation 0.15
Test GroupChange in Probing Depth3 months3.26 milimetersStandard Deviation 0.13
Test GroupChange in Probing DepthBaseline3.74 milimetersStandard Deviation 0.15
Test GroupChange in Probing Depth6 months3.25 milimetersStandard Deviation 0.13
p-value: <0.05Generalized Estimated Equations
Secondary

Change in Bleeding on Probe

Evaluate the difference between baseline and 6 months BoP measures

Time frame: Baseline, 3 and 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control GroupChange in Bleeding on ProbeBaseline54.11 percentage of sites with BoPStandard Deviation 4.97
Control GroupChange in Bleeding on Probe3 months33.27 percentage of sites with BoPStandard Deviation 3.72
Control GroupChange in Bleeding on Probe6 months31.77 percentage of sites with BoPStandard Deviation 3.58
Test GroupChange in Bleeding on ProbeBaseline44.58 percentage of sites with BoPStandard Deviation 3.72
Test GroupChange in Bleeding on Probe3 months27.41 percentage of sites with BoPStandard Deviation 2.35
Test GroupChange in Bleeding on Probe6 months26.17 percentage of sites with BoPStandard Deviation 2.18
p-value: <0.05Generalized Estimated Equations
Secondary

Change in Clinical Attachment Level

Evaluate the difference between baseline and 6 months CAL measures.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 and 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control GroupChange in Clinical Attachment LevelBaseline3.94 milimetersStandard Deviation 0.17
Control GroupChange in Clinical Attachment Level3 months3.58 milimetersStandard Deviation 0.17
Control GroupChange in Clinical Attachment Level6 months3.59 milimetersStandard Deviation 0.17
Test GroupChange in Clinical Attachment LevelBaseline4.01 milimetersStandard Deviation 0.21
Test GroupChange in Clinical Attachment Level3 months3.65 milimetersStandard Deviation 0.21
Test GroupChange in Clinical Attachment Level6 months3.64 milimetersStandard Deviation 0.2
p-value: <0.05Generalized Estimated Equations

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026