Skip to content

Kinematics After Total Knee Arthroplasty

Kinematics Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Performed With Different Surgical Alignment Techniques

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03093077
Enrollment
0
Registered
2017-03-28
Start date
2016-11-30
Completion date
2018-04-10
Last updated
2018-04-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare implant kinematics of conventional mechanically aligned and anatomically aligned total knee arthroplasties (TKA) at 1 year post-operatively.

Detailed description

Participants will be randomized to receive a primary TKA using either an anatomic alignment or a conventional mechanical alignment technique. Participants will undergo a kinematic analysis of a deep knee bend using single-plane fluoroscopy at 1 year post-operatively. The primary outcome will be based on the 6 degree of freedom kinematics and associated joint component proximity during the knee bend task. Secondary outcomes include the Knee Society Score, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and the Forgotten Knee Score.

Interventions

DEVICEDePuy ATTUNE total knee arthroplasty system

A standard midvastus approach will be used for both alignment technique groups. This is a standard approach for exposing the knee joint for TKA.

Sponsors

Kristin Zhao, PhD
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Males and females * Primary arthroplasty for treatment of osteoarthritis * Age between 40 and 80 years old * Willingness to provide written consent for study participation

Exclusion criteria

* Revision arthroplasty * Pre-operative knee flexion lower than 90 degrees * Varus knee deformity greater than 15 degrees * Pre-operative valgus knee deformity * Presence of infections, highly communicable diseases or metastatic disease * Significant neurological or musculoskeletal disorders or disease that may interfere with normal gait or weight bearing * Congenital, developmental, or other bone disease or previous hip surgery that may, in the surgeon's judgment, interfere with total knee prosthesis survival or success * Presence of previous prosthetic knee or hip replacement device * BMI \> 40 * Pregnant women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Knee motion, as determined by 6 degree freedom of movement kinematics and associated joint proximity during the knee bend task.1 year post surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Participants perception of knee function, as determined by the Knee injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)1 year post surgery
Participant's awareness of the joint implant, as determined by the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12)1 year post surgery
Knee joint and ambulatory function based on physical exam, as determined by the Knee Society Score (KSS)1 year post surgery

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026