Skip to content

Sonothrombolysis in Patients With STEMI

Sonothrombolysis in Patients With an ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. A Prospective Single-arm Study.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03092089
Enrollment
15
Registered
2017-03-27
Start date
2017-08-15
Completion date
2019-10-03
Last updated
2021-06-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Keywords

Sonothrombolysis, STEMI, PPCI, Microbubbles

Brief summary

This study evaluates what effect sonothrombolysis may have on spontaneous reperfusion, microvascular obstruction, left ventricular function and infarct size in patients presenting with their first ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Detailed description

This is a prospective, single center, single-arm study that examines pre-procedural sonothrombolysis as an adjuvant to contemporary therapy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction receiving PPCI.This study is to examine what effect adding emergent diagnostic ultrasound (DUS) guided high mechanical index (HMI) impulses (sonothrombolysis), applied both before and after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) during an intravenous commercially available microbubble infusion (Definity), have on spontaneous reperfusion (i.e. pre PCI coronary artery patency rates), microvascular obstruction, left ventricular function and infarct size in patients presenting with their first ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Patients will immediately receive an intravenous infusion of commercially available ultrasound contrast agent (Definity). After starting the infusion, myocardial contrast echocardiography will be performed. 4-, 2- and 3-chamber views will be recorded to document the size of the perfusion defect. Loops of 15 cardiac cycles will be recorded using low mechanical index (MI) ultrasound with a 'flash' delivered after the second cardiac cycle of the loop. The flash is a short impulse of HMI ultrasound which is transmitted to destroy the ultrasound contrast in the myocardium and then to assess the replenishment of myocardial contrast. These recordings will also be used to assess regional wall motion as well as the LV volumes and ejection fraction. Immediately after the diagnostic ultrasound, the therapeutic ultrasound will start using the same transducer by applying multiple HMI ultrasound impulses. The HMI are the same as those which are used for assessment of myocardial perfusion in diagnostic ultrasound. These pulses will be applied in the apical 4-, 2-, and 3-chamber views to the apical windows that contained the risk area. The intervals between HMI impulses will vary from 5 to 15 s depending on the time required for myocardial contrast replenishment. Diagnostic echocardiography will also be scheduled prior to discharge (Day2) and 90 days post procedure. If this study is successful, a larger study will be designed in order to collect the evidence for using contrast ultrasound for treatment of myocardial infarction in clinical practice.

Interventions

Sonothrombolysis (High Impulse therapeutic ultrasound with infusion of ultrasound contrast agent Definity) will be applied before and after standard of care reperfusion therapy with PPCI

Myocardial contrast echocardiography will be applied before standard of care reperfusion therapy as well as prior to discharge and at 3 month follow up

PROCEDURERepurfusion therapy with PPCI

Patients will receive reperfusion therapy with PPCI as standard of care

Sponsors

Alberta Health services
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Alberta
CollaboratorOTHER
Harald Becher
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This clinical study is a prospective single-center, single-arm investigation of sonothrombolysis in adult patients presenting with high-risk STEMI within 6 hrs of the onset of clinical symptoms and receiving reperfusion therapy with PCI. All patients will receive standard therapy. Patients will immediately receive an iv infusion of commercially available ultrasound contrast agent (Definity) and myocardial contrast echocardiography will be performed to document the size of the perfusion defect. Loops of 15 cardiac cycles will be recorded using low mechanical index (MI) ultrasound. These recordings will also be used to assess regional wall motion as well as LV volumes and ejection fraction. Immediately after the diagnostic ultrasound, the therapeutic ultrasound will start using the same transducer by applying multiple high MI ultrasound impulses. These pulses will be applied to the apical windows that contained the risk area. The intervals between HMI impulses will vary from 5 to 15 s.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients presenting with STEMI within 6 hours of symptom onset and: 1. Are expected to receive reperfusion therapy with primary PCI 2. Have a high-risk STEMI ECG defined as: * ≥2mm ST-segment elevation in 2 anterior or lateral leads; or * ≥2 mm ST-segment elevation in 2 inferior leads coupled with ST segment depression in 2 contiguous anterior leads for a total ST-segment deviation of ≥4mm 3. Age ≥30 years. 4. Adequate apical and/or parasternal images by echocardiography

Exclusion criteria

1. Isolated inferior STEMI without anterior ST-segment depression 2. Previous coronary bypass surgery 3. Cardiogenic shock 4. Known or suspected hypersensitivity to ultrasound contrast agent used for the study 5. Life expectancy of less than two months or terminally ill. 6. Known bleeding diathesis or contraindication to glycoprotein 2b/3a inhibitors, anticoagulants, or aspirin 7. Known large right to left intracardiac shunts.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Spontaneous ReperfusionDay 1Spontaneous reperfusion as assessed by a pre PCI ECG complete ST-segment resolution (\>50%) (immediately prior to angiogram)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) by Echocardiography (ECHO) (Simpson Method)Day 1, Day 3±2, 3 month Follow Upassessed on day 1 (pre and post reperfusion), day 3±2 (discharge) and day 90±2 days after infarction
Number of Participants With Complete (>50%) ST-segment Resolution at 30 Minutes Post PCIDay 1Complete ST-segment resolution as assessed by the worst lead on electrocardiogram (ECG core lab)
Wall Motion Score Index (WMSI) by ECHODay 1, Day 3±2 , 3 month Follow UpMean Regional Wall Motion Score Index assessed on day 1 (pre and post reperfusion), day 3±2 (discharge) and 90±2 days after infarction. The wall motion score is determined by visual assessment of the regional wall LV wall motion in the three apical echocardiographic views. The wall motion score of LV segments is dimensionless: normal 1, hypokinetic 2, akinetic 3, dyskinetic 4. The wall motion score index is the sum of all segmental scores divided by the number of segments analyzed (scale 1-4). A wall motion score index of 1 is normal. The worse the wall motion score index the worse is the outcome.
Microvascular Perfusion Score Index (MPSI) by ECHODay 1, Day 3±2, 3 month Follow UpMean microvascular perfusion score index (MPSI) assessed on day 1 (pre and post reperfusion), day 3±2 (discharge) and 90±2 days after infarction The microvascular perfusion score is determined by visual assessment of the LV segments in the three apical echocardiographic views. The microvascular perfusion score of LV segments is dimensionless: normal 1, mildly reduced perfusion 2, no perfusion displayed 3. The microvascular perfusion score index score index is the sum of all segmental scores divided by the number of segments analyzed (scale 1 -3). A microvascular perfusion score index of 1 is normal. The worse the microvascular perfusion score index the worse is the outcome.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Adverse EventsDay 1, Day 3±2, 3 month Follow UpNumber of participants who recorded any adverse events that as per protocol are not related to acute myocardial infarction
Number of Participants With Vasospasm in Culprit Coronary ArteryDay 1Number of participants who recorded any vasospasm due to high impulse ultrasound
Number of Participants With Allergic Reaction to Definity®Day 1, Day 3±2, 3 month Follow UpNumber of participants who recorded any allergic reaction to Definity

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Adult Patients With High Risk STEMI
Adult patients presenting with high-risk STEMI will receive sonothrombolysis with Definity in addition to standard of care (reperfusion therapy with PPCI) Definity, (Lipid Microspheres) Intravenous Suspension: Sonothrombolysis (High Impulse therapeutic ultrasound with infusion of ultrasound contrast agent Definity) will be applied before and after standard of care reperfusion therapy with PPCI Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography: Myocardial contrast echocardiography will be applied before standard of care reperfusion therapy as well as prior to discharge and at 3 month follow up Repurfusion therapy with PPCI: Patients will receive reperfusion therapy with PPCI as standard of care
15
Total15

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAdult Patients With High Risk STEMI
Age, Continuous61.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 15
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Spontaneous Reperfusion

Spontaneous reperfusion as assessed by a pre PCI TIMI 2-3 flow on diagnostic angiogram (immediately prior to angiogram)

Time frame: Day 1

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Adult Patients With High Risk STEMINumber of Participants With Spontaneous Reperfusion7 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Spontaneous Reperfusion

Spontaneous reperfusion as assessed by a pre PCI ECG complete ST-segment resolution (\>50%) (immediately prior to angiogram)

Time frame: Day 1

Population: for patients did not have a pre PCI ECG

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Adult Patients With High Risk STEMINumber of Participants With Spontaneous Reperfusion2 participants
Secondary

Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) by Echocardiography (ECHO) (Simpson Method)

assessed on day 1 (pre and post reperfusion), day 3±2 (discharge) and day 90±2 days after infarction

Time frame: Day 1, Day 3±2, 3 month Follow Up

Population: EF

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Adult Patients With High Risk STEMILeft Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) by Echocardiography (ECHO) (Simpson Method)EF at 3 months54.9 % ejection fractionStandard Deviation 10.6
Adult Patients With High Risk STEMILeft Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) by Echocardiography (ECHO) (Simpson Method)EF Day 3+/-254.6 % ejection fractionStandard Deviation 9.9
Adult Patients With High Risk STEMILeft Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) by Echocardiography (ECHO) (Simpson Method)EF Day 1 post PCI54.5 % ejection fractionStandard Deviation 12.2
Adult Patients With High Risk STEMILeft Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) by Echocardiography (ECHO) (Simpson Method)EF Day 1 pre PCI52.3 % ejection fractionStandard Deviation 10.8
Adult Patients With High Risk STEMILeft Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) by Echocardiography (ECHO) (Simpson Method)EF Day 1 admission51.5 % ejection fractionStandard Deviation 11.6
Secondary

Microvascular Perfusion Score Index (MPSI) by ECHO

Mean microvascular perfusion score index (MPSI) assessed on day 1 (pre and post reperfusion), day 3±2 (discharge) and 90±2 days after infarction The microvascular perfusion score is determined by visual assessment of the LV segments in the three apical echocardiographic views. The microvascular perfusion score of LV segments is dimensionless: normal 1, mildly reduced perfusion 2, no perfusion displayed 3. The microvascular perfusion score index score index is the sum of all segmental scores divided by the number of segments analyzed (scale 1 -3). A microvascular perfusion score index of 1 is normal. The worse the microvascular perfusion score index the worse is the outcome.

Time frame: Day 1, Day 3±2, 3 month Follow Up

Population: Microvascular Perfusion Score Index (MPSI)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Adult Patients With High Risk STEMIMicrovascular Perfusion Score Index (MPSI) by ECHOMPSI 3 months1.2 dimensionlessStandard Deviation 0.2
Adult Patients With High Risk STEMIMicrovascular Perfusion Score Index (MPSI) by ECHOMPSI Day 3+/-21.3 dimensionlessStandard Deviation 0.3
Adult Patients With High Risk STEMIMicrovascular Perfusion Score Index (MPSI) by ECHOMPSI Day 1 post PCI1.4 dimensionlessStandard Deviation 0.3
Adult Patients With High Risk STEMIMicrovascular Perfusion Score Index (MPSI) by ECHOMPSI Day 1 pre PCI1.6 dimensionlessStandard Deviation 0.2
Adult Patients With High Risk STEMIMicrovascular Perfusion Score Index (MPSI) by ECHOMPSI Day 1 admission1.7 dimensionlessStandard Deviation 0.3
Secondary

Number of Participants With Complete (>50%) ST-segment Resolution at 30 Minutes Post PCI

Complete ST-segment resolution as assessed by the worst lead on electrocardiogram (ECG core lab)

Time frame: Day 1

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Adult Patients With High Risk STEMINumber of Participants With Complete (>50%) ST-segment Resolution at 30 Minutes Post PCI14 participants
Secondary

Wall Motion Score Index (WMSI) by ECHO

Mean Regional Wall Motion Score Index assessed on day 1 (pre and post reperfusion), day 3±2 (discharge) and 90±2 days after infarction. The wall motion score is determined by visual assessment of the regional wall LV wall motion in the three apical echocardiographic views. The wall motion score of LV segments is dimensionless: normal 1, hypokinetic 2, akinetic 3, dyskinetic 4. The wall motion score index is the sum of all segmental scores divided by the number of segments analyzed (scale 1-4). A wall motion score index of 1 is normal. The worse the wall motion score index the worse is the outcome.

Time frame: Day 1, Day 3±2 , 3 month Follow Up

Population: Wall Motion Score Index (WMSI)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Adult Patients With High Risk STEMIWall Motion Score Index (WMSI) by ECHOWMSI 3 months1.4 dimensionlessStandard Deviation 0.4
Adult Patients With High Risk STEMIWall Motion Score Index (WMSI) by ECHOWMSI Day 3+/-21.5 dimensionlessStandard Deviation 0.3
Adult Patients With High Risk STEMIWall Motion Score Index (WMSI) by ECHOWMSI Day 1 post PCI1.6 dimensionlessStandard Deviation 0.3
Adult Patients With High Risk STEMIWall Motion Score Index (WMSI) by ECHOWMSI Day 1 pre PCI1.8 dimensionlessStandard Deviation 0.3
Adult Patients With High Risk STEMIWall Motion Score Index (WMSI) by ECHOWMSI Day 1 admission1.8 dimensionlessStandard Deviation 0.3
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Number of participants who recorded any adverse events that as per protocol are not related to acute myocardial infarction

Time frame: Day 1, Day 3±2, 3 month Follow Up

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Adult Patients With High Risk STEMINumber of Participants With Adverse Events0 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Allergic Reaction to Definity®

Number of participants who recorded any allergic reaction to Definity

Time frame: Day 1, Day 3±2, 3 month Follow Up

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Adult Patients With High Risk STEMINumber of Participants With Allergic Reaction to Definity®0 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Vasospasm in Culprit Coronary Artery

Number of participants who recorded any vasospasm due to high impulse ultrasound

Time frame: Day 1

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Adult Patients With High Risk STEMINumber of Participants With Vasospasm in Culprit Coronary Artery0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026