Skip to content

Impact of a Health Intervention on Some Indicators in the Care of Chronic Complex Patient (CCP).

Impact of a Proactive and Integrated Health Intervention Between Different Assistance Levels Over Some Indicators in the Care of Chronic Complex Patient (CCP)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03091036
Acronym
CCP
Enrollment
28
Registered
2017-03-27
Start date
2015-07-31
Completion date
2017-01-31
Last updated
2017-04-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Preventive Care

Keywords

Chronic, Complex

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of proactive and integrated healthcare program for chronic complex patients (CCP). This program are based in coordination the primary level of attention with and speciality level. The objective is reducing hospital readmissions and know the benefit in total cost of care in 4 month before and 4 after intervention.

Detailed description

Quasi-experimental study with single-arm (pre-post study design without control group). The investigators checking pre and post intervention the effectiveness of a healthcare program for CCP. The interventions consist: 1. \- Help the nurse in the hospital to carry out the care plans and the continuity care report. 2. \- Refer patients to the social workers. 3. \- Collaborate with the social worker to refer to centers of media, long stay and reference hospital. 4. \- Ensure the follow-up appointments for the CCP. 5. \- Make proactive calls to the CCP and/or their caregiver after discharge 6. \- Plan the hospital discharge 48 hours in advance, so that the family and the patient can be organized. The investigator analysed if with this program, the CCP reducing hospital readmission and reducing the Hospital expenditure.

Interventions

OTHERProactive healthcare intervention

There is an intervention in the coordination of health resources, and monitoring readmissions and know the benefit in total cost of care in 4 month.

Sponsors

Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
CollaboratorOTHER
María José del Olmo Rubio
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
75 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient ≥ 75 years. * Having attended 5 or more emergency visits or having had more than 3 hospital admissions in the last 12 months. * Identified with social risk alert.

Exclusion criteria

* Participate in other health programs (AHT, diabetes mellitus,...). * Terminal patient.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pre-post change in days of Hospital stay from baseline to 16 weeks.Baseline and 16 weeks.The same group of patients are analyzed the days of hospital stay at the end of 16 weeks of follow-up pre intervention (baseline) and 16 week after the intervention.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of hospital readmissions visits for CCP change from baseline to 16 weeks.Baseline and 16 weeks.The same group of patients are analyzed the number of hospital readmissions visit for CCP at the end of 16 weeks pre intervention (considered baseline) of follow-up and 16 weeks after the intervention.
Number of urgency visits for CCP change from baseline to 16 weeks.Baseline and 16 weeks.The same group of patients are analyzed the number of urgency visits and primary care visit for CCP at the end of 16 weeks pre intervention (considered baseline) of follow-up and 16 weeks after the intervention.
Number of primary care visits for CCP change from baseline to 16 weeks.Baseline and 16 weeks.The same group of patients are analyzed the number of primary care visits for CCP at the end of 16 weeks pre intervention (considered baseline) of follow-up and 16 weeks after the intervention.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026