Skip to content

Cellular & Biocellular Regenerative Therapy in Musculoskeletal Pain, Dysfunction,Degenerative or Inflammatory Disease

Use of Cellular and Biocellular Therapy in Musculoskeletal Pain, Dysfunction, Degenerative or Inflammatory Disease

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03090672
Acronym
BRT
Enrollment
300
Registered
2017-03-27
Start date
2017-03-11
Completion date
2022-12-31
Last updated
2020-01-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Back Pain, Degenerative Joint Disease, Osteoarthritis, Rheumatoid Nodule, Tendinopathy, Tendinosis

Keywords

Arthritis, Degenerative, Tendinosis, Jont disease, Low back pain

Brief summary

Musculoskeletal disorders and degeneration represent injuries or pain in the body's joint ligaments, tendons, muscles, nerves, and skeletal elements that support extremities, spine and related tissues. Direct injuries and aging contribute to breakdown and inflammation of these tissues, leading to debilitation and loss of function in these areas. This has major impact on quality of life, occupational/recreation limitations, and psychosocial implications. Many therapies have been employed including medications, physical therapy, occupational therapy, and a variety of surgical interventions each of which have distinct limitations, often covering the issues versus providing actual healing and return to function. Many reports are now available utilizing self-healing options which include use of stem/stromal cellular therapy or biocellular treatments (either from adipose or marrow) using targeted placement of cells, matrix and platelet concentrates. Termed cellular or Biocellular therapy (typically optimized using ultrasound guidance). It is proposed that use of cellular isolates or cell-stroma derived from the largest deposit of these cells (adipose greater than marrow), may use in conjunction with targeted placement or as a stand alone methodology intravascular use. This study is designed as a interventional means to examine the safety and efficacy of the use of cellular and tissue stromal vascular fraction in musculoskeletal pain, dysfunction degeneration or inflammatory disorders.

Detailed description

Musculoskeletal disorders and degeneration represent injuries or pain in the body's joint ligaments, tendons, muscles, nerves, and skeletal elements that support extremities, spine and related tissues. Direct injuries and aging contribute to breakdown and inflammation of these tissues, leading to debilitation and loss of function in these areas. This has major impact on quality of life, occupational/recreation limitations, and psychosocial implications. Many therapies have been employed including medications, physical therapy, occupational therapy, and a variety of surgical interventions each of which have distinct limitations, often covering the issues versus providing actual healing and return to function. Many reports are now available utilizing self-healing options which include use of stem/stromal cells (either from adipose or marrow) using targeted placement of cells, matrix and platelet concentrates. This is termed Biocellular therapy, and typically is optimized by use of ultrasound guidance. It is proposed that use of cellular isolates derived from the largest deposit of these cells (adipose greater than marrow), may use in conjunction with targeted placement or as a stand alone methodology of parenteral use. This study is designed as a interventional means to examine the safety and efficacy of the use of cellular stromal vascular fraction (cSVF) in musculoskeletal pain, dysfunction degeneration or inflammatory disorders. The important cellular components represent, not the adipocyte, but the heterogeneous cell group associated with the peri-vasculature. The group does include certain cells referred to as stem or stromal cells, and are considered key elements of cellular and biocellular treatments. The carrier microvascular tissue, adipose, has been shown to not participate in wound healing or cellular replacement per se. It is well established that those perivascular (adventitial) cell types are found in essentially all tissues of the body, but in highest numbers in the easily accessed depots with the subdermal fat. It is proposed that areas of these groups are responded to as a result of signaling to permit a chemotactic request for needed growth factors and cytokines which effectively contribute to the healing capability at failing or damaged sites. This Trial will investigate the safety/efficacy of either combining specific targeting (ultrasound) with and/or without systemic parenteral route introduction. This study includes closed syringe, disposable microcannula harvesting of subdermal fat tissues for obtaining the native perivascular stromal elements (extracellular matrix (ECM) and periadventitial cells shown to be multipotent (in potentials), incubation, digestion and isolation of cSVF. This isolated and concentration of stem/stromal cellular pellet (without actual extracellular matrix or stromal scaffolding elements) is then suspended in 500 cc sterile Normal Saline (NS) and deployed via peripheral intravenous route. Evaluations of safety issues are measured at intervals (both severe and non-severe categories) and by ultrasound and imaging studies. Biocellular treatments are defined as use of tissue stromal vascular fraction (tSVF) obtained within adipose tissue complex (ATC), combined with high density platelet rich plasma (HD PRP) concentrated from standard blood draw. Concentration in FDA approved platelet concentrate devices to achieve levels of \>4 times patient's own measured baseline levels. Such concentrates have been shown to provide important growth factors and cytokines (signal proteins) naturally involved in wound healing and repair functions. A form of Cell-Enriched Biocellular Therapy (CEBT) is available as a component of this study, in which the tSVF + HD PRP can be enhanced in cellular numbers via the process of isolating and concentrating cSVF discussed above. Many small case series and case reports have been published in the peer reviewed medical literature which suggest that these interventions are both safe and effective at relieving musculoskeletal disorders included in the study. This study in intended to provide evidence of a non-drug safety and efficacy using both of these interventions. Evaluation and tracking of adverse events or severe adverse events (SAE) will be tracked according to intervals described. Examination of the optimal numbers of cells, viability of such cells, and evaluation of the efficacy will be statistically studied reported relative outcomes.

Interventions

DRUGNormal Saline

Normal Saline IV delivery

PROCEDURETissue Stromal Vascular Fraction

tSVF

BIOLOGICALPlatelet Rich Plasma

PRP

PROCEDURECellular Stromal Vascular Fraction

cSVF

Sponsors

Regeneris Medical
CollaboratorOTHER
Global Alliance for Regenerative Medicine
CollaboratorOTHER
Robert W Alexander, MD
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with documented inflammatory, autoimmune (rheumatoid arthritis (RA), degeneration of musculoskeletal system * No systemic disorders which, in the opinion of the principal investigators or provider, would disqualify from being safely able to undergo needed procedures * Able to provide informed consent * Patient having adequate donor adipose (fat) tissue * Patient mature enough to tolerate the needed procedures

Exclusion criteria

* Systemic or psychological impairment which would preclude patient tolerance and understanding of procedures and follow up * Patients with known active cancer and chemotherapy or radiation therapy * Patients with ongoing active infections * High dose steroid users or use of injections of corticoid steroids within a six month timeframe * Opiate addition or in treatment program for withdrawal * History of severe traumatic brain injuries * If, in the opinion of providers, the patient will not be able to fully cooperate or complete the study and its follow up

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participants with complications1 monthAdverse and Severe Adverse Events Reports

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline quality of life level (QoL Questionnaire)6 months, 12 monthsQoL Questionnaire
Change from baseline visual analog pain score6 months, 1 year, 2 yearChanges of Visual Analog Pain Score (VAS) 1-10
Change from baseline of limitation of activities (Functional analysis of range of motion)baseline, 6 months, 1 yearFunctional analysis of range of motion compared from baseline
Change from baseline of imaging if required for study entrybaseline, 1 yearimaging

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactRyan JP Welter, MD, PhD
r.welter@regenerismedical.com508.345.5492
Backup ContactGabrielle Lewis
g.lewis@regenerismedical.com508.316.4268

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026