Skip to content

Photodynamic Therapy With HPPH Compared to Standard of Care Surgery in Treating Patients With Oral Cavity Cancer

A Randomized Multicenter Phase II Study Using (2-1[Heyloxyethyl]-2-Devinylpyropheophorbide-a) (HPPH) With PDT Versus Standard of Care Surgery for Patients With T1/T2 N0 Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03090412
Enrollment
2
Registered
2017-03-24
Start date
2018-03-07
Completion date
2021-08-06
Last updated
2022-06-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stage I Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Stage II Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Brief summary

This randomized phase II clinical trial studies how well photodynamic therapy with HPPH works compared to standard of care surgery in treating patients with oral cavity cancer. Photodynamic therapy can destroy or control disease by using a combination of drug, such as HPPH, and light and may be as effective as surgery in treating patients with oral cavity cancer.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To test the non-inferiority of photodynamic therapy (PDT) to standard of care surgery by comparing the rate of tumor response after PDT to those observed after surgery, at 24 months post treatment. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine quality of life (QoL) at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post PDT or surgery. II. To assess the toxicity using the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP) National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE Version 4.0). TERTIARY OBJECTIVES: I. Immune markers (T cells). II. To investigate the correlation of the diffuse reflectance optical spectroscopy with tumor response to PDT. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. ARM I: Patients undergo standard of care surgery on day 1. ARM II: Patients receive HPPH intravenously (IV) over 1 hour on day 0 and undergo PDT on day 1. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3-4 months in year 1 and every 3-6 months in year 2.

Interventions

DRUGHPPH

Given IV

OTHERLaboratory Biomarker Analysis

Correlative studies

DRUGPhotodynamic Therapy

Undergo PDT

OTHERQuality-of-Life Assessment

Ancillary studies

PROCEDURETherapeutic Conventional Surgery

Undergo standard of care surgery

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of =\< 2 * Participants with previously untreated T1/T2 N0 squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity with or without extension to the oropharynx * Histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma of the target tumor(s) * Tumor thickness is 4 mm or less (measured clinically and/or by computed tomography \[CT\] or magnetic resonance imaging \[MRI\] scan) * CT or MRI of the neck to confirm staging * Tumor accessible for unrestricted illumination for photodynamic therapy (PDT) (accessibility as determined by the physician) * Life expectancy of at least 12 months in the judgment of the physician * Participants of child-bearing potential must agree to use adequate contraceptive methods (e.g., hormonal or barrier method of birth control; abstinence) prior to study entry and for the duration of study participation; should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while she is participating in this study, she should inform her treating physician immediately * Participant or legal representative must understand the investigational nature of this study and sign an Institutional Review Board approved written informed consent form prior to receiving any study related procedure

Exclusion criteria

* Those who have had chemotherapy or radiotherapy or targeted agents within 4 weeks (6 weeks for nitrosoureas or mitomycin C) prior to entering the study or those who have not recovered from adverse events due to agents administered more than 4 weeks earlier * Those with known brain metastases should be excluded from this clinical trial because of their poor prognosis and because they often develop progressive neurologic dysfunction that would confound the evaluation of neurologic and other adverse events * Those with porphyria or with known hypersensitivity to porphyrins or porphyrin-like compounds * White blood cells (WBC) \< 4,000 * Total serum bilirubin \> 2 mg/dL * Serum creatinine \> 2 mg/dL * Alkaline phosphatase (hepatic) or serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) \> 3 times the upper normal limit * Diagnostic biopsy reveals perineural invasion (PNI) and/or lymphovascular invasion (LVI) * Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements * Nodal disease as detected by clinical exam or CT * Pregnant or nursing females * Unwilling or unable to follow protocol requirements * Any condition which in the investigator's opinion deems the participant an unsuitable candidate to receive study drug * Received an investigational agent within 30 days prior to enrollment * Trismus or compromised airway * Previous treatment in the target tumor area

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of Tumor Response as Evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1At 24 monthsObjective tumor response will be tabulated overall.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Quality of Life as Measured by the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire Version 4Baseline up to 24 monthsIn the analysis of QoL simple data analyses will initially take place including individual participant-level profile plots and overall mean plots used to examining the mean structure. Formal statistical examination of longitudinal patterns will be done through the use of a mixed model. Once the model is fit, specific linear contrasts based on the estimated model parameters will be constructed and used to test hypotheses concerning between time points and between group comparisons
Adverse Events as Graded by CTCAE Version 4.0 Are ReportedUp to 30 days after administration of HPPHThe frequency of toxicities will be tabulated by grade.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm I (Surgery)
Patients undergo standard of care surgery on day 1. Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Therapeutic Conventional Surgery: Undergo standard of care surgery
1
Arm II (HPPH, PDT)
Patients receive HPPH IV over 1 hour on day 0 and undergo PDT on day 1. HPPH: Given IV Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies Photodynamic Therapy: Undergo PDT Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
1
Total2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm I (Surgery)Arm II (HPPH, PDT)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Age, Continuous86 years55 years71 years
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 10 / 1
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 11 / 1
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 11 / 1

Outcome results

Primary

Rate of Tumor Response as Evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1

Objective tumor response will be tabulated overall.

Time frame: At 24 months

Population: Due to PI departure and early termination with few patients, only the counts of events have been calculated and no testing was done

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm I (Surgery)Rate of Tumor Response as Evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1No evidence of disease1 Participants
Arm I (Surgery)Rate of Tumor Response as Evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1Other0 Participants
Arm II (HPPH, PDT)Rate of Tumor Response as Evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1No evidence of disease0 Participants
Arm II (HPPH, PDT)Rate of Tumor Response as Evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1Other1 Participants
Secondary

Adverse Events as Graded by CTCAE Version 4.0 Are Reported

The frequency of toxicities will be tabulated by grade.

Time frame: Up to 30 days after administration of HPPH

Population: Due to PI departure with few patients, only the counts of events have been calculated and no tabulation was done..

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm I (Surgery)Adverse Events as Graded by CTCAE Version 4.0 Are Reported1 Participants
Arm II (HPPH, PDT)Adverse Events as Graded by CTCAE Version 4.0 Are Reported1 Participants
Secondary

Change in Quality of Life as Measured by the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire Version 4

In the analysis of QoL simple data analyses will initially take place including individual participant-level profile plots and overall mean plots used to examining the mean structure. Formal statistical examination of longitudinal patterns will be done through the use of a mixed model. Once the model is fit, specific linear contrasts based on the estimated model parameters will be constructed and used to test hypotheses concerning between time points and between group comparisons

Time frame: Baseline up to 24 months

Population: Due to PI departure with few patients, only the counts of events have been calculated and no testing was done..

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm I (Surgery)Change in Quality of Life as Measured by the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire Version 4Outstanding Overall QoL1 Participants
Arm I (Surgery)Change in Quality of Life as Measured by the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire Version 4Very good to Outstanding Overall QoL0 Participants
Arm II (HPPH, PDT)Change in Quality of Life as Measured by the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire Version 4Outstanding Overall QoL0 Participants
Arm II (HPPH, PDT)Change in Quality of Life as Measured by the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire Version 4Very good to Outstanding Overall QoL1 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026