Ischemic Heart Disease, NSTEMI - Non-ST Segment Elevation MI, Stable Angina, Stable Coronary Artery Disease, Unstable Angina
Conditions
Brief summary
to evaluate safety and efficacy of CGBIO stent(DES) compared to Biomatrix flex stent(DES)
Detailed description
A Multicenter, subject-blinded, randomized study to evaluate safety and efficacy of CGBIO stent compared to Biomatrix Flex stent in patients undergoing drug-eluting stent procedure after coronary angiography
Interventions
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* At least one lesion with a diameter stenosis \>50% * suitable for coronary stent implantation in a vessel with a reference diameter ranging from 2.5 mm to 4.0 mm; * Gr 1 ≤TIMI flow
Exclusion criteria
* ST-segment elevation MI * Bifurcation lesion * Chronic total occulusion * Restenosis lesion * Graft vessel lesion * Patient has a history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or patients in whom anti-platelet and/or anticoagulant therapy is contraindicated or in which patient will not be able to comply with dual antiplatelet therapy for at least 1 year * Cardiogenic shock or hemodynamic compromise * Existing impairment in liver and kidney.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| in-segment late loss | 9 month | angiographic in-segment late loss measure by QCA program |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| in-stent late loss | 9 month | angiographic in-stent late loss measure by QCA program |
| MACE | 9 month | death, MI and TVF |
| Restenosis rate | 9month | angiographic restenosis rate |
Countries
South Korea