Skip to content

To Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of CGBIO Stent Compared to Biomatrix Flex Stent

A Multicenter, Subject-blinded, Randomized Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of CGBIO Stent Compared to Biomatrix Flex Stent in Patients Undergoing Drug-eluting Stent Procedure After Coronary Angiography

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03089450
Enrollment
112
Registered
2017-03-24
Start date
2017-03-22
Completion date
2018-06-30
Last updated
2017-03-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ischemic Heart Disease, NSTEMI - Non-ST Segment Elevation MI, Stable Angina, Stable Coronary Artery Disease, Unstable Angina

Brief summary

to evaluate safety and efficacy of CGBIO stent(DES) compared to Biomatrix flex stent(DES)

Detailed description

A Multicenter, subject-blinded, randomized study to evaluate safety and efficacy of CGBIO stent compared to Biomatrix Flex stent in patients undergoing drug-eluting stent procedure after coronary angiography

Interventions

DEVICECGBio stent

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Sponsors

CGBio Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* At least one lesion with a diameter stenosis \>50% * suitable for coronary stent implantation in a vessel with a reference diameter ranging from 2.5 mm to 4.0 mm; * Gr 1 ≤TIMI flow

Exclusion criteria

* ST-segment elevation MI * Bifurcation lesion * Chronic total occulusion * Restenosis lesion * Graft vessel lesion * Patient has a history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or patients in whom anti-platelet and/or anticoagulant therapy is contraindicated or in which patient will not be able to comply with dual antiplatelet therapy for at least 1 year * Cardiogenic shock or hemodynamic compromise * Existing impairment in liver and kidney.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
in-segment late loss9 monthangiographic in-segment late loss measure by QCA program

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
in-stent late loss9 monthangiographic in-stent late loss measure by QCA program
MACE9 monthdeath, MI and TVF
Restenosis rate9monthangiographic restenosis rate

Countries

South Korea

Contacts

Primary ContactHyo-Soo KIim, MD/PhD
usahyosoo@gmail.com+82-2-2072-2226

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026