Skip to content

Intra-Articular Platelet Rich Plasm Use in Osteoarthritis of Knee.

Intra-Articular Use of Platelet Rich Plasma Versus Corticosteroid: A Clinical Trials in Osteoarthritis of Knee.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03086759
Enrollment
99
Registered
2017-03-22
Start date
2017-01-02
Completion date
2018-06-02
Last updated
2019-01-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Osteoarthritis

Brief summary

Osteoarthritis of the knee is a very prevalent disease. However, there are few therapeutic options for its patients. Platelet-rich plasma is a treatment option for chronic pain. If proven to be effective in its intra-articular use, Platelet-rich plasma may help in the treatment of these patients. Goal: Primary objective: To compare effectiveness in improving pain and function and the medium-term tolerance (12 weeks) of intra-articular injection of Platelet-rich plasma versus intraarticular injection of triamcinolone hexacetonide in patients with symptomatic primary knee osteoarthritis. Secondary objective: To compare the medium-term effectiveness of intra-articular injection of Platelet-rich plasma versus intra-articular injection of triamcinolone hexacetonide to improve synovial hypertrophy and quality of life in these patients. Methods: A prospective randomized controlled double-blind study with three groups (each with n = 33) of patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of knees who will receive intra-articular infiltration in a single moment. Patients will be allocated to one of three groups: 1) Platelet-rich plasma group: patients who will receive plasma; 2) triamcinolone hexacetonide Group: patients who will receive 40mg of triamcinolone hexacetonide; And 3) Isotonic saline solution group: patients who will receive isotonic saline solution. The patients will be evaluated by blind evaluators in 4 assessment times up to 12 weeks of follow-up through clinical assessment instruments (rest and movement pain, joint edema, goniometry, clinical improvement scale, quality of life questionnaire as the SF36), functional (Womac questionnaire, M. Lequesne Functional Knee Index, 6 min walk test, Time up and go test), and ultrasound test (quantitative and semiquantitative measurement of synovial hypertrophy and semiquantitative Power Doppler). Statistics: The following statistical tests will be used according to the need: Student's t test, Mann-whitney, Pearson's chi-square test and ANOVA for repeated measures. A statistical significance of 5% will be considered.

Interventions

intra-articular infiltration with platelet rich plasm

intra-articular infiltration withTriamcinolone Hexacetonide

intra-articular infiltration with Isotonic Saline Solution

Sponsors

Federal University of São Paulo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* primary knee osteoarthritis * degree II and II in Kellgren & Lawrence classification * pain duration: more than three months * pain in the visual analogue scale between 4 and 8cm * agree in participate and sign the consent form

Exclusion criteria

* secondary knee osteoarthritis * skin lesion in knee * intraarticular joint injection in the previous three months * steroids use in the previous 30 days * degree I or IV in Kellgren & Lawrence classification * inflammatory arthritis, gout and pseudo-gout * cancer * previous surgery in knee * cardiovascular and respiratory disease that change functional status * pregnancy and breastfeed * coagulation disturb * bacterial infection * handicapped * NSAIDs and Platelet anticoagulant in the previous month

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in painBaseline, after 4, 8, 12 and 48 weeksEvaluated using a visual analogue scale

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in range of motionBaseline, after 4, 8, 12 and 48 weeksEvaluated using goniometry
Change in a clinical improvement scaleBaseline, after 4, 8, 12 and 48 weeksEvaluated using an improvement scale
Change in joint edemaBaseline, after 4, 8, 12 and 48 weeksEvaluated using a visual analogue scale
Change in functional capacityBaseline, after 4, 8, 12 and 48 weeksUsing the WOMAC questionnaire
Changing in quantitative and semiquantitative measurement of synovial hypertrophy and semiquantitative Power DopplerBaseline, after 4, 8, 12 and 48 weeksUsing an ultrasound exam
Change in quality of lifeBaseline, after 4, 8, 12 and 48 weeksUsing the SF-36 questionnaire

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026