Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Semaglutide Once-weekly Versus Placebo as add-on to SGLT-2i in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Efficacy and Safety of Semaglutide Once-weekly Versus Placebo as add-on to SGLT-2i in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. A 30-week Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03086330
Acronym
SUSTAIN 9
Enrollment
302
Registered
2017-03-22
Start date
2017-03-15
Completion date
2018-08-06
Last updated
2021-07-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Brief summary

This trial is conducted in Asia, Europe and North America. The aim of the trial is to compare the effect of semaglutide s.c. 1.0 mg once-weekly versus placebo as add-on to sodium glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT-2i) monotherapy or in combination with either metformin or sulfonylurea on glycaemic control after 30 weeks of treatment in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Subjects will remain on their pre-trial medication.

Interventions

DRUGSemaglutide

Semaglutide, gradually increased to 1.0 mg, injected once weekly under the skin (subcutaneously, s.c.) for 30 weeks

DRUGPlacebo

Semaglutide placebo, gradually increased to 1.0 mg, injected once weekly under the skin (subcutaneously, s.c.) for 30 weeks

Sponsors

Novo Nordisk A/S
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Informed consent obtained before any trial-related activities. Trial-related activities are any procedures that are carried out as part of the trial, including activities to determine suitability for the trial * Male or female, above or equal to 18 years at the time of signing informed consent. For Japan only: Male or female, age equal to or above 20 years at the time of signing informed consent * Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus * HbA1c of 7.0-10.0% (53-86 mmol/mol) (both inclusive) * Stable dose of an SGLT-2 inhibitor as monotherapy or in combination (including fixed-dose drug combination) with a stable dose of metformin (equal to or above 1500 mg or maximum tolerated dose) or a SU for at least 90 days prior to the day of screening. All medications in compliance with current local label

Exclusion criteria

* Female who is pregnant, breast-feeding or intends to become pregnant or is of child-bearing potential and not using an adequate contraceptive method (adequate contraceptive measure as required by local regulation or practice) * Any disorder which in the investigator's opinion might jeopardise subject's safety or compliance with the protocol * Treatment with any medication for the indication of diabetes or obesity other than stated in the inclusion criteria within the past 90 days prior to the day of screening. However, short term insulin treatment for a maximum of 14 days prior to the day of screening is allowed * Subjects with alanine aminotransferase above 2.5 x upper normal limit * Family or personal history of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 or medullary thyroid carcinoma. Family is defined as a first degree relative * History or presence of pancreatitis (acute or chronic) * History of diabetic ketoacidosis * Any of the following: myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina or transient ischaemic attack within the past 180 days prior to the day of screening * Subjects presently classified as being in New York Heart Association Class IV * Planned coronary, carotid or peripheral artery revascularisation known on the day of screening * Renal impairment measured as estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate value of eGFR below 60 ml/min/1.73 m\^2 as defined by KDIGO 2012 classification using isotope dilution mass spectrometry for serum creatinine measured at screening * Proliferative retinopathy or maculopathy requiring acute treatment. Verified by fundus photography or dilated fundoscopy performed within the past 90 days prior to randomisation * Presence or history of malignant neoplasms within the past 5 years prior to the day of screening. Basal and squamous cell skin cancer and any carcinoma in-situ is allowed

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in HbA1cWeek 0, week 30Change from baseline (week 0) in HbA1c was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the first date of any of the following: 1) the last dose of trial product + 7 days or 2) initiation of rescue medication.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Body Weight (kg)Week 0, week 30Change from baseline (week 0) in body weight was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.
Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)Week 0, week 30Change from baseline (week 0) in FPG was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.
Change in Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG), 7-point Profile: Mean 7-point ProfileWeek 0, week 30Change from baseline (week 0) in mean of the SMPG, 7-point profile was evaluated at week 30. Mean 7-point profile (the area under the profile) was calculated using the trapezoidal method and divided by the measurement time. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period. Participants measured their plasma glucose at 7 different time points: before breakfast, 90 minutes after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after start of dinner and at bedtime.
Change in Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG), 7-point Profile: Mean Post Prandial Increment (Over All Meals)Week 0, week 30Change from baseline (week 0) in mean post prandial increment (over all meals) in the SMPG, 7-point profile was evaluated at week 30. The mean increment over all meals was derived as the mean of all available meal increments. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.
Change in Fasting Blood Lipid, Total CholesterolWeek 0, week 30Change from baseline (week 0) in total cholesterol (measured in mmol/L and presented as ratio to baseline) was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.
Change in Fasting Blood Lipid, Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) CholesterolWeek 0, week 30Change from baseline (week 0) in LDL (measured in mmol/L and presented as ratio to baseline) was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.
Change in Fasting Blood Lipid, High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) CholesterolWeek 0, week 30Change from baseline (week 0) in HDL (measured in mmol/L and presented as ratio to baseline) was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.
Change in Fasting Blood Lipid, TriglyceridesWeek 0, week 30Change from baseline (week 0) in triglycerides (measured in mmol/L and presented as ratio to baseline) was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.
Change in Body Weight (%)Week 0, week 30Percent (%) change from baseline (week 0) in body weight (measured in kilogram (kg)) was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.
Change in Body Mass IndexWeek 0, week 30Change from baseline (week 0) in body mass index (BMI) was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period. BMI was calculated as 'body weight in kg/(height in meters) x (height in meters)'.
Change in Waist CircumferenceWeek 0, week 30Change from baseline (week 0) in waist circumference was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.
Change in Systolic Blood PressureWeek 0, week 30Change from baseline (week 0) in systolic blood pressure was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.
Change in Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 0, week 30Change from baseline (week 0) in diastolic blood pressure was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.
Change in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Short-form Health Survey (SF-36v2TM): Total Scores (Physical Component and Mental Component) and Scores From the 8 DomainsWeek 0, week 30Change from baseline (week 0) in patient reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire, SF-36v2TM was evaluated at week 30. The SF-36v2™ questionnaire was used to assess the overall health related quality of life of participants. This questionnaire contains 36 items and measures the individual overall health related quality of life on 8 domains: 1) Physical functioning, 2) Role functioning, 3) Bodily pain, 4) General health, 5) Vitality, 6) Social functioning, 7) Role emotional and 8) Mental health. Each item is scored on a scale from 1 to either 2, 3, 5, or 6; each item score is then converted to a scale of 0-100, representing the percentage of total possible score achieved and with higher scores indicating a higher health status; items on the same scale are then averaged to obtain the 8 scale scores. Physical component summary (PCS) includes domains 1-4 and mental component summary (MCS) includes domains 5-8. Higher PCS and MCS scores on a scale of 0-100 indicate a higher health status.
Change in Biochemistry: AmylaseWeek 0, week 30Change from baseline (week 0) in amylase was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.
Change in Biochemistry: LipaseWeek 0, week 30Change from baseline (week 0) in lipase was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.
Change in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ): Treatment Satisfaction Score (Sum of 6 of 8 Items) and the 8 Items SeparatelyWeek 0, week 30Change from baseline (week 0) in PRO questionnaire, DTSQ was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period. The DTSQ measures satisfaction with diabetes treatment. The DTSQ consists of 8 items evaluating 6 aspects of treatment satisfaction and 2 perceived recent event rates of hyperglycemia/hypoglycemia. Each item is scored on a 7- point Likert scale ranging from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 6 (very satisfied). Items evaluating 6 aspects (items 3-8) of treatment satisfaction are summed to produce a total treatment satisfaction score; DTSQ status total scores range from 0-36, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction; the perceived frequency of hyperglycemia/hypoglycemia items are scored separately, with lower scores indicating better perceived blood glucose control.
HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol)After 30 weeksPercentage of participants with HbA1c below 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.
HbA1c Equal to or Below 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol)After 30 weeksPercentage of participants with HbA1c equal to or below 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.
Weight Loss Equal to or Above 3%After 30 weeksPercentage of participants with weight loss equal to or above 3% of their baseline (week 0) body weight was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.
Weight Loss Equal to or Above 5%After 30 weeksPercentage of participants with weight loss equal to or above 5% of their baseline (week 0) body weight was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.
Weight Loss Equal to or Above 10%After 30 weeksPercentage of participants with weight loss equal to or above 10% of their baseline (week 0) body weight was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.
HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia Episodes and no Weight GainAfter 30 weeksPercentage of participants with HbA1c below 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia episodes and no weight gain from their baseline (week 0) body weight was evaluated at week 30. Severe or blood glucose (BG)-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia: an episode that was severe according to the American Diabetes Association (ADA) classification or confirmed by a plasma glucose (PG) value below 3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.
HbA1c Reduction Equal to or Above 1%-PointAfter 30 weeksPercentage of participants with HbA1c reduction equal to or above 1%-point was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.
HbA1c Reduction Equal to or Above 1%-Point and Weight Loss Equal to or Above 3%After 30 weeksPercentage of participants with HbA1c reduction equal to or above 1%-point and weight loss equal to or above 3% of their baseline (week 0) body weight was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.
HbA1c Reduction Equal to or Above 1%-Point and Weight Loss Equal to or Above 5%After 30 weeksPercentage of participants with HbA1c reduction equal to or above 1%-point and weight loss equal to or above 5% of their baseline (week 0) body weight was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.
HbA1c Reduction Equal to or Above 1%-Point and Weight Loss Equal to or Above 10%After 30 weeksPercentage of participants with HbA1c reduction equal to or above 1%-point and weight loss equal to or above 10% of their baseline (week 0) body weight was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.
Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Week 0 - week 30A TEAE was defined as an event that has onset date (or increase in severity) during the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 42 days.
Number of Treatment Emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic EpisodesWeek 0 - week 30Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment emergent if the onset of the episode occurred within the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 42 days. Severe or BG-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia: an episode that was severe according to the ADA classification or confirmed by a PG value below 3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia.
Change in Haematology: HaemoglobinWeek 0, week 30Change from baseline (week 0) in haemoglobin was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.
Change in Haematology: HaematocritWeek 0, week 30Change from baseline (week 0) in haematocrit was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.
Change in Haematology: ThrombocytesWeek 0, week 30Change from baseline (week 0) in thrombocytes was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.
Change in Haematology: ErythrocytesWeek 0, week 30Change from baseline (week 0) in erythrocytes was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.
Change in Biochemistry: Alkaline PhosphataseWeek 0, week 30Change from baseline (week 0) in alkaline phosphatase was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.
Change in Biochemistry: Alanine AminotransferaseWeek 0, week 30Change from baseline (week 0) in alanine aminotransferase was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.
Change in Biochemistry: Aspartate AminotransferaseWeek 0, week 30Change from baseline (week 0) in aspartate aminotransferase was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.
Change in Biochemistry: Total BilirubinWeek 0, week 30Change from baseline (week 0) in total bilirubin was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.
Change in Biochemistry: AlbuminWeek 0, week 30Change from baseline (week 0) in albumin was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.
Change in Biochemistry: Calcium (Total)Week 0, week 30Change from baseline (week 0) in albumin was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.
Change in Biochemistry: PotassiumWeek 0, week 30Change from baseline (week 0) in potassium was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.
Change in Biochemistry: SodiumWeek 0, week 30Change from baseline (week 0) in sodium was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.
Change in Biochemistry: BicarbonateWeek 0, week 30Change from baseline (week 0) in bicarbonate was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.
Change in Biochemistry: Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)Week 0, week 30Change from baseline (week 0) in eGFR was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.
Change in Biochemistry: CreatinineWeek 0, week 30Change from baseline (week 0) in creatinine was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.
Change in CalcitoninWeek 0, week 30Change from baseline (week 0) in calcitonin was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.
Change in PulseWeek 0, week 30Change from baseline (week 0) in pulse rate was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.
Change in ElectrocardiogramWeek 0, week 30Electrocardiogram (ECG) results are presented for week 0 (baseline) and week 30. ECG finding are presented as percentage of participants with normal, abnormal non-clinically significant (NCS) and abnormal clinically significant (CS) ECG values. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 42 days.
Change in Physical Examination: General AppearanceWeek -2, week 30Physical examination (general appearance) results are presented for week -2 (baseline) and week 30. Results are presented as percentage of participants with normal, abnormal NCS and abnormal CS findings. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.
Change in Physical Examination: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemWeek -2, week 30Physical examination (central and peripheral nervous system) results are presented for week -2 (baseline) and week 30. Results are presented as percentage of participants with normal, abnormal NCS and abnormal CS findings. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.
Change in Haematology: LeucocytesWeek 0, week 30Change from baseline (week 0) in leucocytes was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.
Change in Physical Examination: Gastrointestinal System Including MouthWeek -2, week 30Physical examination (gastrointestinal system including mouth) results are presented for week -2 (baseline) and week 30. Results are presented as percentage of participants with normal, abnormal NCS and abnormal CS findings. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.
Change in Physical Examination: SkinWeek -2, week 30Physical examination (skin) results are presented for week -2 (baseline) and week 30. Results are presented as percentage of participants with normal, abnormal NCS and abnormal CS findings. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.
Change in Physical Examination: Respiratory SystemWeek -2, week 30Physical examination (respiratory system) results are presented for week -2 (baseline) and week 30. Results are presented as percentage of participants with normal, abnormal NCS and abnormal CS findings. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.
Change in Physical Examination: Lymph Node PalpationWeek -2, week 30Physical examination (lymph node palpation) results are presented for week -2 (baseline) and week 30. Results are presented as percentage of participants with normal, abnormal NCS and abnormal CS findings. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.
Change in Physical Examination: Thyroid GlandWeek -2, week 30Physical examination (thyroid gland) results are presented for week -2 (baseline) and week 30. Results are presented as percentage of participants with normal, abnormal NCS and abnormal CS findings. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.
Change in FundoscopyWeek 0, week 30Fundoscopy results for both left and right eyes are presented for week 0 (baseline) and week 30. Results are presented as percentage of participants with normal, abnormal NCS and abnormal CS findings. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.
Change in Physical Examination: Cardiovascular SystemWeek -2, week 30Physical examination (cardiovascular system) results are presented for week -2 (baseline) and week 30. Results are presented as percentage of participants with normal, abnormal NCS and abnormal CS findings. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.

Countries

Austria, Canada, Japan, Norway, Puerto Rico, Russia, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The trial was conducted at 61 sites in 6 countries as follows: Austria (4 sites), Canada (8 sites), Japan (4 sites), Norway (4 sites), Russian Federation (5 sites), United States of America (USA) (36 sites). In addition, 1 site in Norway and 3 sites in the USA screened, but didn't randomise any participant.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Semaglutide 1.0 mg
Participants received semaglutide in a dose escalation manner for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg (weeks 1 to 4), 0.50 mg (weeks 5 to 8) and 1.0 mg (weeks 9 to 30). Semaglutide was taken once weekly as s.c. injections.
151
Placebo
Participants received matching placebo (for semaglutide) in a dose escalation manner for 30 weeks. Placebo was taken once weekly as s.c. injections. Dose escalation for placebo matched that for semaglutide with regards to volume.
151
Total302

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up12
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject32

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTotalSemaglutide 1.0 mg
Age, Continuous56.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
57.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
57.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
13 Participants22 Participants9 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
138 Participants280 Participants142 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c)8.1 Percentage HbA1c
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8
8.0 Percentage HbA1c
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8
8.0 Percentage HbA1c
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska native
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
35 Participants71 Participants36 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
4 Participants13 Participants9 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
3 Participants7 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
109 Participants209 Participants100 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
64 Participants126 Participants62 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
87 Participants176 Participants89 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1500 / 151
other
Total, other adverse events
49 / 15028 / 151
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 1506 / 151

Outcome results

Primary

Change in HbA1c

Change from baseline (week 0) in HbA1c was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the first date of any of the following: 1) the last dose of trial product + 7 days or 2) initiation of rescue medication.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: Full analysis set (FAS), which included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in HbA1c-1.6 Percentage of HbA1cStandard Deviation 0.8
PlaceboChange in HbA1c-0.2 Percentage of HbA1cStandard Deviation 0.9
Comparison: The responses were analysed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment, stratification factor and region as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate. Before analysis, missing data were multiple imputed using observed data from participants within the same group defined by randomised treatment, using a regression model including stratification factor and region as categorical effects and data from baseline and all previous visits as covariates.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.61, -1.24]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Biochemistry: Alanine Aminotransferase

Change from baseline (week 0) in alanine aminotransferase was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Biochemistry: Alanine Aminotransferase4.5 U/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 123.2
PlaceboChange in Biochemistry: Alanine Aminotransferase4.8 U/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 166.7
Secondary

Change in Biochemistry: Albumin

Change from baseline (week 0) in albumin was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Biochemistry: Albumin0.1 g/dLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 45.4
PlaceboChange in Biochemistry: Albumin0.1 g/dLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 48.6
Secondary

Change in Biochemistry: Alkaline Phosphatase

Change from baseline (week 0) in alkaline phosphatase was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Biochemistry: Alkaline Phosphatase4.6 U/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 171.2
PlaceboChange in Biochemistry: Alkaline Phosphatase7.2 U/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 106.7
Secondary

Change in Biochemistry: Amylase

Change from baseline (week 0) in amylase was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Biochemistry: Amylase10.2 U/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 113.8
PlaceboChange in Biochemistry: Amylase5.0 U/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 121.7
Secondary

Change in Biochemistry: Aspartate Aminotransferase

Change from baseline (week 0) in aspartate aminotransferase was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Biochemistry: Aspartate Aminotransferase3.4 U/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 112.3
PlaceboChange in Biochemistry: Aspartate Aminotransferase3.5 U/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 90.1
Secondary

Change in Biochemistry: Bicarbonate

Change from baseline (week 0) in bicarbonate was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Biochemistry: Bicarbonate2.2 mmol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 67.6
PlaceboChange in Biochemistry: Bicarbonate2.1 mmol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 69
Secondary

Change in Biochemistry: Calcium (Total)

Change from baseline (week 0) in albumin was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Biochemistry: Calcium (Total)0.04 mmol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 125
PlaceboChange in Biochemistry: Calcium (Total)0.05 mmol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 88.9
Secondary

Change in Biochemistry: Creatinine

Change from baseline (week 0) in creatinine was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Biochemistry: Creatinine4.6 umol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 118.8
PlaceboChange in Biochemistry: Creatinine2.6 umol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 191.5
Secondary

Change in Biochemistry: Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)

Change from baseline (week 0) in eGFR was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Biochemistry: Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)3.4 mL/min/1.73m2Geometric Coefficient of Variation 114.8
PlaceboChange in Biochemistry: Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)3.2 mL/min/1.73m2Geometric Coefficient of Variation 105.6
Secondary

Change in Biochemistry: Lipase

Change from baseline (week 0) in lipase was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Biochemistry: Lipase11.6 U/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 140.2
PlaceboChange in Biochemistry: Lipase4.5 U/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 171.8
Secondary

Change in Biochemistry: Potassium

Change from baseline (week 0) in potassium was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Biochemistry: Potassium0.3 mmol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 89.5
PlaceboChange in Biochemistry: Potassium0.2 mmol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 73.7
Secondary

Change in Biochemistry: Sodium

Change from baseline (week 0) in sodium was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Biochemistry: Sodium1.7 mmol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 55.8
PlaceboChange in Biochemistry: Sodium1.5 mmol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 48.4
Secondary

Change in Biochemistry: Total Bilirubin

Change from baseline (week 0) in total bilirubin was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Biochemistry: Total Bilirubin2.3 umol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 128.1
PlaceboChange in Biochemistry: Total Bilirubin1.7 umol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 134.8
Secondary

Change in Body Mass Index

Change from baseline (week 0) in body mass index (BMI) was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period. BMI was calculated as 'body weight in kg/(height in meters) x (height in meters)'.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: FAS which included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Body Mass Index-1.7 Kg/sqmStandard Deviation 1.5
PlaceboChange in Body Mass Index-0.4 Kg/sqmStandard Deviation 1.1
Secondary

Change in Body Weight (%)

Percent (%) change from baseline (week 0) in body weight (measured in kilogram (kg)) was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: FAS which included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Body Weight (%)-5.4 PercentageStandard Deviation 4.8
PlaceboChange in Body Weight (%)-1.0 PercentageStandard Deviation 3.1
Secondary

Change in Body Weight (kg)

Change from baseline (week 0) in body weight was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: FAS which included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Body Weight (kg)-4.7 KgStandard Deviation 4.3
PlaceboChange in Body Weight (kg)-1.0 KgStandard Deviation 3.1
Comparison: The responses were analysed using an ANCOVA with treatment, stratification factor and region as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate. Before analysis, missing data were multiple imputed using observed data from participants within the same group defined by randomised treatment, using a regression model including stratification factor and region as categorical effects and data from baseline and all previous visits as covariates.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-4.7, -2.93]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Calcitonin

Change from baseline (week 0) in calcitonin was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Calcitonin1.3 ng/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 172.1
PlaceboChange in Calcitonin1.7 ng/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 171.1
Secondary

Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure

Change from baseline (week 0) in diastolic blood pressure was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: FAS which included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Diastolic Blood Pressure-0.1 mmHgStandard Deviation 8.1
PlaceboChange in Diastolic Blood Pressure-0.1 mmHgStandard Deviation 6.7
Secondary

Change in Electrocardiogram

Electrocardiogram (ECG) results are presented for week 0 (baseline) and week 30. ECG finding are presented as percentage of participants with normal, abnormal non-clinically significant (NCS) and abnormal clinically significant (CS) ECG values. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 42 days.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in ElectrocardiogramWeek 0: Normal62.4 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in ElectrocardiogramWeek 0: Abnormal, NCS36.9 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in ElectrocardiogramWeek 0: Abnormal, CS0.7 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in ElectrocardiogramWeek 30: Normal64.3 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in ElectrocardiogramWeek 30: Abnormal, NCS34.9 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in ElectrocardiogramWeek 30: Abnormal, CS0.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in ElectrocardiogramWeek 30: Abnormal, NCS32.2 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in ElectrocardiogramWeek 0: Normal66.2 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in ElectrocardiogramWeek 30: Normal66.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in ElectrocardiogramWeek 0: Abnormal, NCS32.5 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in ElectrocardiogramWeek 30: Abnormal, CS1.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in ElectrocardiogramWeek 0: Abnormal, CS1.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Change in Fasting Blood Lipid, High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol

Change from baseline (week 0) in HDL (measured in mmol/L and presented as ratio to baseline) was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: FAS which included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Fasting Blood Lipid, High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol0.99 RatioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 15.8
PlaceboChange in Fasting Blood Lipid, High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol1.01 RatioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 13.9
Secondary

Change in Fasting Blood Lipid, Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol

Change from baseline (week 0) in LDL (measured in mmol/L and presented as ratio to baseline) was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: FAS which included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Fasting Blood Lipid, Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol0.90 RatioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 31.6
PlaceboChange in Fasting Blood Lipid, Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol1.04 RatioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 27.7
Secondary

Change in Fasting Blood Lipid, Total Cholesterol

Change from baseline (week 0) in total cholesterol (measured in mmol/L and presented as ratio to baseline) was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: FAS which included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Fasting Blood Lipid, Total Cholesterol0.91 RatioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 19.4
PlaceboChange in Fasting Blood Lipid, Total Cholesterol1.02 RatioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 18.9
Secondary

Change in Fasting Blood Lipid, Triglycerides

Change from baseline (week 0) in triglycerides (measured in mmol/L and presented as ratio to baseline) was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: FAS which included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Fasting Blood Lipid, Triglycerides0.81 RatioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 41.3
PlaceboChange in Fasting Blood Lipid, Triglycerides0.97 RatioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 38.7
Secondary

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

Change from baseline (week 0) in FPG was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: FAS which included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)-2.26 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.05
PlaceboChange in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)0.07 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.07
Secondary

Change in Fundoscopy

Fundoscopy results for both left and right eyes are presented for week 0 (baseline) and week 30. Results are presented as percentage of participants with normal, abnormal NCS and abnormal CS findings. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in FundoscopyLeft eye: Week 0; abnormal, NCS24.7 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in FundoscopyLeft eye: Week 30; normal79.3 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in FundoscopyRight eye: Week 0; abnormal, NCS25.3 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in FundoscopyLeft eye: Week 0; normal70.7 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in FundoscopyRight eye: Week 0; abnormal, CS5.3 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in FundoscopyLeft eye: Week 30; abnormal, NCS17.1 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in FundoscopyRight eye: Week 30; normal75.6 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in FundoscopyLeft eye: Week 0; abnormal, CS4.7 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in FundoscopyRight eye: Week 30; abnormal, NCS19.5 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in FundoscopyLeft eye: Week 30; abnormal, CS3.7 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in FundoscopyRight eye: Week 30; abnormal, CS4.9 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in FundoscopyRight eye: Week 0; normal69.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in FundoscopyRight eye: Week 30; abnormal, CS4.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in FundoscopyLeft eye: Week 0; normal62.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in FundoscopyLeft eye: Week 0; abnormal, NCS32.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in FundoscopyLeft eye: Week 0; abnormal, CS5.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in FundoscopyLeft eye: Week 30; normal64.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in FundoscopyLeft eye: Week 30; abnormal, NCS31.5 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in FundoscopyLeft eye: Week 30; abnormal, CS4.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in FundoscopyRight eye: Week 0; normal62.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in FundoscopyRight eye: Week 0; abnormal, NCS30.9 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in FundoscopyRight eye: Week 0; abnormal, CS6.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in FundoscopyRight eye: Week 30; normal63.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in FundoscopyRight eye: Week 30; abnormal, NCS31.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Change in Haematology: Erythrocytes

Change from baseline (week 0) in erythrocytes was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Haematology: Erythrocytes0.16 10^12 erythrocytes/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 111
PlaceboChange in Haematology: Erythrocytes0.11 10^12 erythrocytes/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 168.3
Secondary

Change in Haematology: Haematocrit

Change from baseline (week 0) in haematocrit was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Haematology: Haematocrit1.4 % of red blood cellsGeometric Coefficient of Variation 130.3
PlaceboChange in Haematology: Haematocrit1.1 % of red blood cellsGeometric Coefficient of Variation 155.1
Secondary

Change in Haematology: Haemoglobin

Change from baseline (week 0) in haemoglobin was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Haematology: Haemoglobin1.1 mmol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 22.1
PlaceboChange in Haematology: Haemoglobin1.1 mmol/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 29.3
Secondary

Change in Haematology: Leucocytes

Change from baseline (week 0) in leucocytes was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Haematology: Leucocytes0.65 10^9 leucocytes/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 186.6
PlaceboChange in Haematology: Leucocytes0.54 10^9 leucocytes/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 146.8
Secondary

Change in Haematology: Thrombocytes

Change from baseline (week 0) in thrombocytes was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Haematology: Thrombocytes25.3 10^9 thrombocytes/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 94.9
PlaceboChange in Haematology: Thrombocytes20.2 10^9 thrombocytes/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 100.7
Secondary

Change in Physical Examination: Cardiovascular System

Physical examination (cardiovascular system) results are presented for week -2 (baseline) and week 30. Results are presented as percentage of participants with normal, abnormal NCS and abnormal CS findings. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.

Time frame: Week -2, week 30

Population: SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: Cardiovascular SystemWeek 30: Normal98.3 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: Cardiovascular SystemWeek 30: Abnormal, NCS1.7 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: Cardiovascular SystemWeek 30: Abnormal, CS0 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: Cardiovascular SystemWeek -2: Normal98.7 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: Cardiovascular SystemWeek -2: Abnormal, NCS1.3 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: Cardiovascular SystemWeek -2: Abnormal, CS0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: Cardiovascular SystemWeek -2: Abnormal, NCS6.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: Cardiovascular SystemWeek 30: Normal92.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: Cardiovascular SystemWeek -2: Normal93.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: Cardiovascular SystemWeek 30: Abnormal, NCS7.2 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: Cardiovascular SystemWeek -2: Abnormal, CS0.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: Cardiovascular SystemWeek 30: Abnormal, CS0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Change in Physical Examination: Central and Peripheral Nervous System

Physical examination (central and peripheral nervous system) results are presented for week -2 (baseline) and week 30. Results are presented as percentage of participants with normal, abnormal NCS and abnormal CS findings. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.

Time frame: Week -2, week 30

Population: SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemWeek -2: Normal92.0 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemWeek -2: Abnormal, NCS7.3 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemWeek -2: Abnormal, CS0.7 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemWeek 30: Normal94.2 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemWeek 30: Abnormal, NCS5.0 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemWeek 30: Abnormal, CS0.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemWeek 30: Abnormal, NCS12.2 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemWeek -2: Normal86.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemWeek 30: Normal87.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemWeek -2: Abnormal, NCS12.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemWeek 30: Abnormal, CS0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: Central and Peripheral Nervous SystemWeek -2: Abnormal, CS0.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Change in Physical Examination: Gastrointestinal System Including Mouth

Physical examination (gastrointestinal system including mouth) results are presented for week -2 (baseline) and week 30. Results are presented as percentage of participants with normal, abnormal NCS and abnormal CS findings. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.

Time frame: Week -2, week 30

Population: SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: Gastrointestinal System Including MouthWeek -2: Abnormal, NCS6.7 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: Gastrointestinal System Including MouthWeek 30: Abnormal, CS0.8 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: Gastrointestinal System Including MouthWeek -2: Abnormal, CS0 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: Gastrointestinal System Including MouthWeek -2: Normal93.3 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: Gastrointestinal System Including MouthWeek 30: Normal95.9 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: Gastrointestinal System Including MouthWeek 30: Abnormal, NCS3.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: Gastrointestinal System Including MouthWeek 30: Abnormal, CS0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: Gastrointestinal System Including MouthWeek 30: Abnormal, NCS5.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: Gastrointestinal System Including MouthWeek -2: Normal93.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: Gastrointestinal System Including MouthWeek -2: Abnormal, NCS6.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: Gastrointestinal System Including MouthWeek -2: Abnormal, CS0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: Gastrointestinal System Including MouthWeek 30: Normal94.2 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Change in Physical Examination: General Appearance

Physical examination (general appearance) results are presented for week -2 (baseline) and week 30. Results are presented as percentage of participants with normal, abnormal NCS and abnormal CS findings. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.

Time frame: Week -2, week 30

Population: SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: General AppearanceWeek -2: Normal90.0 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: General AppearanceWeek -2: Abnormal, NCS10.0 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: General AppearanceWeek -2: Abnormal, CS0 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: General AppearanceWeek 30: Normal87.6 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: General AppearanceWeek 30: Abnormal, NCS11.6 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: General AppearanceWeek 30: Abnormal, CS0.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: General AppearanceWeek 30: Abnormal, NCS12.2 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: General AppearanceWeek -2: Normal86.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: General AppearanceWeek 30: Normal87.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: General AppearanceWeek -2: Abnormal, NCS14.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: General AppearanceWeek 30: Abnormal, CS0.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: General AppearanceWeek -2: Abnormal, CS0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Change in Physical Examination: Lymph Node Palpation

Physical examination (lymph node palpation) results are presented for week -2 (baseline) and week 30. Results are presented as percentage of participants with normal, abnormal NCS and abnormal CS findings. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.

Time frame: Week -2, week 30

Population: SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: Lymph Node PalpationWeek -2: Normal99.3 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: Lymph Node PalpationWeek -2: Abnormal, NCS0.7 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: Lymph Node PalpationWeek -2: Abnormal, CS0 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: Lymph Node PalpationWeek 30: Normal99.2 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: Lymph Node PalpationWeek 30: Abnormal, NCS0 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: Lymph Node PalpationWeek 30: Abnormal, CS0.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: Lymph Node PalpationWeek 30: Abnormal, NCS0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: Lymph Node PalpationWeek -2: Normal100 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: Lymph Node PalpationWeek 30: Normal100 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: Lymph Node PalpationWeek -2: Abnormal, NCS0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: Lymph Node PalpationWeek 30: Abnormal, CS0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: Lymph Node PalpationWeek -2: Abnormal, CS0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Change in Physical Examination: Respiratory System

Physical examination (respiratory system) results are presented for week -2 (baseline) and week 30. Results are presented as percentage of participants with normal, abnormal NCS and abnormal CS findings. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.

Time frame: Week -2, week 30

Population: SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: Respiratory SystemWeek -2: Normal100 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: Respiratory SystemWeek -2: Abnormal, NCS0 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: Respiratory SystemWeek -2: Abnormal, CS0 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: Respiratory SystemWeek 30: Normal100 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: Respiratory SystemWeek 30: Abnormal, NCS0 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: Respiratory SystemWeek 30: Abnormal, CS0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: Respiratory SystemWeek 30: Abnormal, NCS0.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: Respiratory SystemWeek -2: Normal98.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: Respiratory SystemWeek 30: Normal99.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: Respiratory SystemWeek -2: Abnormal, NCS1.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: Respiratory SystemWeek 30: Abnormal, CS0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: Respiratory SystemWeek -2: Abnormal, CS0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Change in Physical Examination: Skin

Physical examination (skin) results are presented for week -2 (baseline) and week 30. Results are presented as percentage of participants with normal, abnormal NCS and abnormal CS findings. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.

Time frame: Week -2, week 30

Population: SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: SkinWeek 30: Abnormal, CS0 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: SkinWeek -2: Normal91.3 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: SkinWeek -2: Abnormal, NCS8.7 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: SkinWeek -2: Abnormal, CS0 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: SkinWeek 30: Normal93.4 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: SkinWeek 30: Abnormal, NCS6.6 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: SkinWeek 30: Normal95.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: SkinWeek 30: Abnormal, CS0.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: SkinWeek -2: Abnormal, CS0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: SkinWeek -2: Normal93.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: SkinWeek 30: Abnormal, NCS4.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: SkinWeek -2: Abnormal, NCS6.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Change in Physical Examination: Thyroid Gland

Physical examination (thyroid gland) results are presented for week -2 (baseline) and week 30. Results are presented as percentage of participants with normal, abnormal NCS and abnormal CS findings. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.

Time frame: Week -2, week 30

Population: SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: Thyroid GlandWeek -2: Normal98.0 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: Thyroid GlandWeek -2: Abnormal, NCS2.0 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: Thyroid GlandWeek -2: Abnormal, CS0 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: Thyroid GlandWeek 30: Normal99.2 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: Thyroid GlandWeek 30: Abnormal, NCS0.8 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Physical Examination: Thyroid GlandWeek 30: Abnormal, CS0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: Thyroid GlandWeek 30: Abnormal, NCS2.9 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: Thyroid GlandWeek -2: Normal96.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: Thyroid GlandWeek 30: Normal97.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: Thyroid GlandWeek -2: Abnormal, NCS3.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: Thyroid GlandWeek 30: Abnormal, CS0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboChange in Physical Examination: Thyroid GlandWeek -2: Abnormal, CS0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Change in Pulse

Change from baseline (week 0) in pulse rate was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 7 days.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Pulse4.0 beats/minStandard Deviation 9.6
PlaceboChange in Pulse0.1 beats/minStandard Deviation 8.4
Secondary

Change in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ): Treatment Satisfaction Score (Sum of 6 of 8 Items) and the 8 Items Separately

Change from baseline (week 0) in PRO questionnaire, DTSQ was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period. The DTSQ measures satisfaction with diabetes treatment. The DTSQ consists of 8 items evaluating 6 aspects of treatment satisfaction and 2 perceived recent event rates of hyperglycemia/hypoglycemia. Each item is scored on a 7- point Likert scale ranging from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 6 (very satisfied). Items evaluating 6 aspects (items 3-8) of treatment satisfaction are summed to produce a total treatment satisfaction score; DTSQ status total scores range from 0-36, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction; the perceived frequency of hyperglycemia/hypoglycemia items are scored separately, with lower scores indicating better perceived blood glucose control.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: FAS which included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ): Treatment Satisfaction Score (Sum of 6 of 8 Items) and the 8 Items Separately2) Feeling of unacceptably low blood sugars0.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ): Treatment Satisfaction Score (Sum of 6 of 8 Items) and the 8 Items Separately5) Flexibility of current treatment0.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ): Treatment Satisfaction Score (Sum of 6 of 8 Items) and the 8 Items Separately3) Satisfaction with current treatment0.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ): Treatment Satisfaction Score (Sum of 6 of 8 Items) and the 8 Items Separately6) Satisfaction with understanding of diabetes0.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ): Treatment Satisfaction Score (Sum of 6 of 8 Items) and the 8 Items SeparatelyTotal treatment satisfaction score (Sum of 3-8)4.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.6
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ): Treatment Satisfaction Score (Sum of 6 of 8 Items) and the 8 Items Separately7) Recommending treatment to others0.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ): Treatment Satisfaction Score (Sum of 6 of 8 Items) and the 8 Items Separately4) Convenience of current treatment0.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ): Treatment Satisfaction Score (Sum of 6 of 8 Items) and the 8 Items Separately8) Satisfaction to continue with present treatment0.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ): Treatment Satisfaction Score (Sum of 6 of 8 Items) and the 8 Items Separately1) Feeling of unacceptably high blood sugars-2.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
PlaceboChange in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ): Treatment Satisfaction Score (Sum of 6 of 8 Items) and the 8 Items Separately8) Satisfaction to continue with present treatment0.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
PlaceboChange in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ): Treatment Satisfaction Score (Sum of 6 of 8 Items) and the 8 Items Separately1) Feeling of unacceptably high blood sugars-0.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
PlaceboChange in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ): Treatment Satisfaction Score (Sum of 6 of 8 Items) and the 8 Items Separately2) Feeling of unacceptably low blood sugars-0.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
PlaceboChange in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ): Treatment Satisfaction Score (Sum of 6 of 8 Items) and the 8 Items SeparatelyTotal treatment satisfaction score (Sum of 3-8)1.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7
PlaceboChange in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ): Treatment Satisfaction Score (Sum of 6 of 8 Items) and the 8 Items Separately3) Satisfaction with current treatment0.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
PlaceboChange in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ): Treatment Satisfaction Score (Sum of 6 of 8 Items) and the 8 Items Separately4) Convenience of current treatment0.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
PlaceboChange in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ): Treatment Satisfaction Score (Sum of 6 of 8 Items) and the 8 Items Separately5) Flexibility of current treatment0.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
PlaceboChange in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ): Treatment Satisfaction Score (Sum of 6 of 8 Items) and the 8 Items Separately6) Satisfaction with understanding of diabetes0.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
PlaceboChange in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ): Treatment Satisfaction Score (Sum of 6 of 8 Items) and the 8 Items Separately7) Recommending treatment to others0.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Secondary

Change in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Short-form Health Survey (SF-36v2TM): Total Scores (Physical Component and Mental Component) and Scores From the 8 Domains

Change from baseline (week 0) in patient reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire, SF-36v2TM was evaluated at week 30. The SF-36v2™ questionnaire was used to assess the overall health related quality of life of participants. This questionnaire contains 36 items and measures the individual overall health related quality of life on 8 domains: 1) Physical functioning, 2) Role functioning, 3) Bodily pain, 4) General health, 5) Vitality, 6) Social functioning, 7) Role emotional and 8) Mental health. Each item is scored on a scale from 1 to either 2, 3, 5, or 6; each item score is then converted to a scale of 0-100, representing the percentage of total possible score achieved and with higher scores indicating a higher health status; items on the same scale are then averaged to obtain the 8 scale scores. Physical component summary (PCS) includes domains 1-4 and mental component summary (MCS) includes domains 5-8. Higher PCS and MCS scores on a scale of 0-100 indicate a higher health status.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: FAS which included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Short-form Health Survey (SF-36v2TM): Total Scores (Physical Component and Mental Component) and Scores From the 8 DomainsPhysical component summary1.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.9
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Short-form Health Survey (SF-36v2TM): Total Scores (Physical Component and Mental Component) and Scores From the 8 Domains1) Physical functioning1.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.1
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Short-form Health Survey (SF-36v2TM): Total Scores (Physical Component and Mental Component) and Scores From the 8 Domains2) Role functioning1.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.1
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Short-form Health Survey (SF-36v2TM): Total Scores (Physical Component and Mental Component) and Scores From the 8 Domains3) Bodily pain0.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.4
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Short-form Health Survey (SF-36v2TM): Total Scores (Physical Component and Mental Component) and Scores From the 8 Domains4) General health2.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.8
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Short-form Health Survey (SF-36v2TM): Total Scores (Physical Component and Mental Component) and Scores From the 8 DomainsMental component summary0.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.6
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Short-form Health Survey (SF-36v2TM): Total Scores (Physical Component and Mental Component) and Scores From the 8 Domains5) Vitality1.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.2
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Short-form Health Survey (SF-36v2TM): Total Scores (Physical Component and Mental Component) and Scores From the 8 Domains6) Social functioning0.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.3
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Short-form Health Survey (SF-36v2TM): Total Scores (Physical Component and Mental Component) and Scores From the 8 Domains7) Role emotional0.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.7
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Short-form Health Survey (SF-36v2TM): Total Scores (Physical Component and Mental Component) and Scores From the 8 Domains8) Mental health0.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.2
PlaceboChange in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Short-form Health Survey (SF-36v2TM): Total Scores (Physical Component and Mental Component) and Scores From the 8 Domains6) Social functioning-1.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.4
PlaceboChange in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Short-form Health Survey (SF-36v2TM): Total Scores (Physical Component and Mental Component) and Scores From the 8 DomainsPhysical component summary0.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.4
PlaceboChange in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Short-form Health Survey (SF-36v2TM): Total Scores (Physical Component and Mental Component) and Scores From the 8 DomainsMental component summary-0.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
PlaceboChange in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Short-form Health Survey (SF-36v2TM): Total Scores (Physical Component and Mental Component) and Scores From the 8 Domains1) Physical functioning1.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.2
PlaceboChange in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Short-form Health Survey (SF-36v2TM): Total Scores (Physical Component and Mental Component) and Scores From the 8 Domains8) Mental health-0.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6
PlaceboChange in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Short-form Health Survey (SF-36v2TM): Total Scores (Physical Component and Mental Component) and Scores From the 8 Domains2) Role functioning0.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6
PlaceboChange in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Short-form Health Survey (SF-36v2TM): Total Scores (Physical Component and Mental Component) and Scores From the 8 Domains5) Vitality0.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.7
PlaceboChange in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Short-form Health Survey (SF-36v2TM): Total Scores (Physical Component and Mental Component) and Scores From the 8 Domains3) Bodily pain0.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.1
PlaceboChange in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Short-form Health Survey (SF-36v2TM): Total Scores (Physical Component and Mental Component) and Scores From the 8 Domains7) Role emotional-0.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.5
PlaceboChange in Scores for Selected Patient Reported Outcomes: Short-form Health Survey (SF-36v2TM): Total Scores (Physical Component and Mental Component) and Scores From the 8 Domains4) General health0.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.8
Secondary

Change in Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG), 7-point Profile: Mean 7-point Profile

Change from baseline (week 0) in mean of the SMPG, 7-point profile was evaluated at week 30. Mean 7-point profile (the area under the profile) was calculated using the trapezoidal method and divided by the measurement time. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period. Participants measured their plasma glucose at 7 different time points: before breakfast, 90 minutes after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after start of dinner and at bedtime.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: FAS which included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG), 7-point Profile: Mean 7-point Profile-2.6 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.9
PlaceboChange in Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG), 7-point Profile: Mean 7-point Profile-0.3 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2
Secondary

Change in Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG), 7-point Profile: Mean Post Prandial Increment (Over All Meals)

Change from baseline (week 0) in mean post prandial increment (over all meals) in the SMPG, 7-point profile was evaluated at week 30. The mean increment over all meals was derived as the mean of all available meal increments. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: FAS which included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG), 7-point Profile: Mean Post Prandial Increment (Over All Meals)-1.2 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2
PlaceboChange in Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG), 7-point Profile: Mean Post Prandial Increment (Over All Meals)0.0 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.2
Secondary

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure

Change from baseline (week 0) in systolic blood pressure was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: FAS which included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Systolic Blood Pressure-4.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 14.5
PlaceboChange in Systolic Blood Pressure1.1 mmHgStandard Deviation 12.3
Secondary

Change in Waist Circumference

Change from baseline (week 0) in waist circumference was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.

Time frame: Week 0, week 30

Population: FAS which included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 1.0 mgChange in Waist Circumference-4.4 cmStandard Deviation 5.5
PlaceboChange in Waist Circumference-1.8 cmStandard Deviation 4.5
Secondary

HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol)

Percentage of participants with HbA1c below 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.

Time frame: After 30 weeks

Population: FAS which included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Semaglutide 1.0 mgHbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol)82.5 Percentage of participants
PlaceboHbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol)20.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia Episodes and no Weight Gain

Percentage of participants with HbA1c below 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) without severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia episodes and no weight gain from their baseline (week 0) body weight was evaluated at week 30. Severe or blood glucose (BG)-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia: an episode that was severe according to the American Diabetes Association (ADA) classification or confirmed by a plasma glucose (PG) value below 3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.

Time frame: After 30 weeks

Population: FAS which included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Semaglutide 1.0 mgHbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia Episodes and no Weight Gain72.5 Percentage of participants
PlaceboHbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia Episodes and no Weight Gain17.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

HbA1c Equal to or Below 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol)

Percentage of participants with HbA1c equal to or below 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.

Time frame: After 30 weeks

Population: FAS which included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Semaglutide 1.0 mgHbA1c Equal to or Below 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol)60.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboHbA1c Equal to or Below 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol)3.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

HbA1c Reduction Equal to or Above 1%-Point

Percentage of participants with HbA1c reduction equal to or above 1%-point was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.

Time frame: After 30 weeks

Population: FAS which included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Semaglutide 1.0 mgHbA1c Reduction Equal to or Above 1%-Point80.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboHbA1c Reduction Equal to or Above 1%-Point15.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

HbA1c Reduction Equal to or Above 1%-Point and Weight Loss Equal to or Above 10%

Percentage of participants with HbA1c reduction equal to or above 1%-point and weight loss equal to or above 10% of their baseline (week 0) body weight was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.

Time frame: After 30 weeks

Population: FAS which included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Semaglutide 1.0 mgHbA1c Reduction Equal to or Above 1%-Point and Weight Loss Equal to or Above 10%15.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboHbA1c Reduction Equal to or Above 1%-Point and Weight Loss Equal to or Above 10%1.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

HbA1c Reduction Equal to or Above 1%-Point and Weight Loss Equal to or Above 3%

Percentage of participants with HbA1c reduction equal to or above 1%-point and weight loss equal to or above 3% of their baseline (week 0) body weight was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.

Time frame: After 30 weeks

Population: FAS which included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Semaglutide 1.0 mgHbA1c Reduction Equal to or Above 1%-Point and Weight Loss Equal to or Above 3%56.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboHbA1c Reduction Equal to or Above 1%-Point and Weight Loss Equal to or Above 3%7.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

HbA1c Reduction Equal to or Above 1%-Point and Weight Loss Equal to or Above 5%

Percentage of participants with HbA1c reduction equal to or above 1%-point and weight loss equal to or above 5% of their baseline (week 0) body weight was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.

Time frame: After 30 weeks

Population: FAS which included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Semaglutide 1.0 mgHbA1c Reduction Equal to or Above 1%-Point and Weight Loss Equal to or Above 5%41.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboHbA1c Reduction Equal to or Above 1%-Point and Weight Loss Equal to or Above 5%4.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

A TEAE was defined as an event that has onset date (or increase in severity) during the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 42 days.

Time frame: Week 0 - week 30

Population: Safety analysis set (SAS), which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product (semaglutide or placebo).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Semaglutide 1.0 mgNumber of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)356 Events
PlaceboNumber of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)247 Events
Secondary

Number of Treatment Emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes

Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment emergent if the onset of the episode occurred within the on-treatment observation period, which started at the date of first dose of trial product and ended at the last date on trial product + 42 days. Severe or BG-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia: an episode that was severe according to the ADA classification or confirmed by a PG value below 3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia.

Time frame: Week 0 - week 30

Population: SAS, which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Semaglutide 1.0 mgNumber of Treatment Emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes4 Episodes
PlaceboNumber of Treatment Emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes0 Episodes
Secondary

Weight Loss Equal to or Above 10%

Percentage of participants with weight loss equal to or above 10% of their baseline (week 0) body weight was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.

Time frame: After 30 weeks

Population: FAS which included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Semaglutide 1.0 mgWeight Loss Equal to or Above 10%15.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboWeight Loss Equal to or Above 10%1.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Weight Loss Equal to or Above 3%

Percentage of participants with weight loss equal to or above 3% of their baseline (week 0) body weight was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.

Time frame: After 30 weeks

Population: FAS which included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Semaglutide 1.0 mgWeight Loss Equal to or Above 3%69.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboWeight Loss Equal to or Above 3%21.1 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Weight Loss Equal to or Above 5%

Percentage of participants with weight loss equal to or above 5% of their baseline (week 0) body weight was evaluated at week 30. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.

Time frame: After 30 weeks

Population: FAS which included all randomised participants. Number analyzed = number of participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Semaglutide 1.0 mgWeight Loss Equal to or Above 5%50.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboWeight Loss Equal to or Above 5%7.8 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 3, 2026