Skip to content

Mechanisms of Active Music Engagement to Improve Health Outcomes of Children With Cancer and Parents

Mechanisms of Active Music Engagement to Improve Health Outcomes of Children With Cancer and Parents

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03085927
Acronym
PINPOINT
Enrollment
137
Registered
2017-03-21
Start date
2016-09-26
Completion date
2020-04-06
Last updated
2021-11-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer

Keywords

music therapy, neoplasms, play, children, parents

Brief summary

Music therapy, a frequently used arts-based therapy, has become standard palliative care in many pediatric and adult hospitals; however, few studies have examined the mechanisms by which music therapy interventions work. This study investigates behavioral, social, and psychological factors that may explain how an Active Music Engagement (AME) intervention (i.e., an interactive, music-based play intervention) works to manage emotional distress and improve positive health outcomes in parents and young children with cancer during treatment. Findings will provide scientific and clinically relevant practice knowledge to guide delivery of music therapy as a complementary therapy.

Detailed description

Music therapy, a frequently used arts-based therapy, has become standard palliative care in many pediatric and adult hospitals; however, few studies have examined mechanisms by which music therapy interventions work.Based on the Contextual Support Model of Music Therapy, the investigators developed and tested the Active Music Engagement (AME) intervention, establishing it as a feasible and acceptable intervention that reduces emotional distress in young children (ages 3-8) hospitalized for cancer treatment.Emotional distress in young children with cancer during acute treatment and their parents is a prevalent,persistent problem associated with physical symptom distress and diminished quality of life and family function. The music therapist-led AME uses music-based play and parent education/support (music play resource kit; tip sheets), is easy to implement, and teaches parents/children how to therapeutically use a familiar activity to manage distress. The purpose of this two group randomized controlled trial is to identify behavioral, sociological, and psychological variables contributing to positive outcomes observed in previous AME studies (i.e., mediators) and identify for whom the intervention works (i.e., moderators). The investigators will examine proximal mediators of child engagement and parent-child interaction and distal mediators of perceived family normalcy, parent confidence (self-efficacy) about their ability to support their child during treatment, and independent parent/child use of music and play activities to manage distress during hospitalization. The investigators hypothesize these factors mediate change in outcomes of child emotional distress, physical symptom distress, and quality of life; parent emotional/traumatic distress and quality of life; and family function. Specific aims are to examine: 1) effects of proximal and distal mediators of AME on young child/parent outcomes; 2) moderators of AME on young child/parent distress; 3) explore child physical symptom distress (pain, fatigue, nausea) in mediation and moderation models. Child/parent dyads (n=184) will be stratified by age and randomized in blocks of 6 to AME or audio-storybooks; each group will receive three 45-minute sessions with a credentialed music therapist for 3 consecutive days with data collection at baseline, post-intervention, and 30 days later. Mediation effects will be estimated using ANCOVA, fitting appropriate mediation models using MPlus and then testing indirect effects using the percentile bootstrap approach to estimate indirect effect. Moderation effects will be tested by including appropriate interaction terms of the potential moderator with the intervention indicator in our models.

Interventions

Three 45-minute sessions with a board-certified music therapist delivered over three days. Sessions are delivered in a private setting during in-patient hospitalization. During the first visit, parent and child will receive information on common responses of young children to cancer treatment and how parents can use music play activities to support their child during treatment. The music therapist will lead parent and child in a variety of music play activities. Parent and child will receive a music kit that includes items such as hand-held rhythm instruments, puppets, and a music CD. During the second and third visit the music therapist will lead parent and child child through the music play activities, answer questions, and make suggestions for using these activities in the hospital and at home.

Three 45-minute sessions with a board-certified music therapist delivered over three days. Sessions are delivered in a private setting during in-patient hospitalization. Each session children/parents will choose and listen to one of three illustrated children's books with audio recorded narration.

Sponsors

Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
CollaboratorOTHER
Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City
CollaboratorOTHER
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Indiana University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Years to 8 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

(Child/Parent): * Children ages 3-8 years inclusive. * Expected treatment course for at least 3 days to receive chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. * A consistent parent who can be present for all sessions.

Exclusion criteria

(Child/Parent): * Child and/or parent do not speak English. * Child has a significant cognitive impairment that hinders participation (based on physician judgment).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Family Normalcy Perspective - Family Management Measure (FaMM)Time 2(post-session 3 on day 3) and Time 3 (30-days post-session 3, approximately 33 days)Family Normalcy is assessed through The Family Management Measure (FaMM) - Family Life Difficulty Subscale includes 14-items rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale. Subscale items address parents' perceptions of the extent to which having a child with a chronic condition makes family life difficult. Higher values indicate more difficulty managing the condition. Score range 14 - 70.
Parent Self-Efficacy - Parental Beliefs Scale (PBS).Time 2(post-session 3 on day 3) and Time 3 (30-days post-session 3, approximately 33 days)Parent Self-Efficacy is assessed through the Parental Beliefs Scale (PBS) for Hospitalized Children, a 20-item scale that measures parental beliefs about their confidence in anticipating changes in their hospitalized child's behavior and confidence in their parental role during hospitalization. Scores range from 20-100, with higher scores indicating more positive beliefs.
Child Emotional Distress - Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Time 2(post-session 3 on day 3) and Time 3 (30-days post-session 3, approximately 33 days)Child Emotional Distress is assessed through the Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ-PF98) Mental Health Subscale (Landgraf et al., 1999). This subscale consists of 16 items rated on a 5-point Likert-scale. Scores range from 16 to 80 with lower scores indicating better mental health.
Child Quality of Life - KINDL.Time 2(post-session 3 on day 3) and Time 3 (30-days post-session 3, approximately 33 days)Child Quality of Life is assessed through the KINDL Questionnaire for Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life in Children. The KINDL consists of 24 parent-report items rated on a 5-point Likert-scale for each subscale. Scores range from 20-100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Parent Emotional and Traumatic Stress Symptoms - Profile of Mood States-Short Form (POMS).Time 2(post-session 3 on day 3) and Time 3 (30-days post-session 3, approximately 33 days)Parent Emotional and Traumatic Distress was assessed through the Profile of Mood States - Short Form (POMS-SF) which measures mood disturbance. There are 37 items which respondents rate on a 5-point Likert scale. Scores range from 0 to 148 with higher scores indicating greater mood disturbance.
Parent Emotional and Traumatic Stress Symptoms - Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R)Time 2(post-session 3 on day 3) and Time 3 (30-days post-session 3, approximately 33 days)Stress Symptoms assessed through the Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R), a 22-item measure that measures traumatic stress symptoms in response to a traumatic event that is specified in the instructions. Parents respond to each item using a 5-point Likert scale. Scores range from 0 to 12 with higher scores indicating greater traumatic stress symptoms.
Parent Quality of Life - Index of Well Being.Time 2(post-session 3 on day 3) and Time 3 (30-days post-session 3, approximately 33 days)Parent Quality of Life is assessed through the Index of Well-being, a 9-item semantic differential scale describing present life using adjective extremes. Scores range from 7 to 63 with higher scores meaning greater well-being.
Family Function - Family Adaptability and Cohesion Scale (FACES II).Time 2(post-session 3 on day 3) and Time 3 (30-days post-session 3, approximately 33 days)Family Function is assessed through the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Scale II (FACES II), a 30-item scale of items rated using a 5-point Likert scale. Scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores meaning higher family adaptability and cohesion.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited as dyads (child/parent) at 4 sites from September of 2016 through February of 2020. The first participant was enrolled on September 26, 2016 and the last participant was enrolled on February 20, 2020.

Pre-assignment details

Participants in this study were enrolled as a dyad (child/parent). Totals listed below represent the numbers of dyads enrolled. One dyad of the 137 total dyads enrolled came off study prior to completing baseline measures due to the child's toxicity/side effects of cancer treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm 1-Active Music Engagement (Children)
Three 45-minute sessions with a board-certified music therapist delivered over three days. Sessions are delivered in a private setting during in-patient hospitalization. During the first visit, parent and child will receive information on common responses of young children to cancer treatment and how parents can use music play activities to support their child during treatment. The music therapist will lead parent and child in a variety of music play activities. Parent and child will receive a music kit that includes items such as hand-held rhythm instruments, puppets, and a music CD. During the second and third visit the music therapist will lead parent and child child through the music play activities, answer questions, and make suggestions for using these activities in the hospital and at home.
69
Arm II- Audio-Storybooks (Children)
Three 45-minute sessions with a board-certified music therapist delivered over three days. Sessions are delivered in a private setting during in-patient hospitalization. Each session children/parents will choose and listen to one of three illustrated children's books with audio recorded narration.
67
Arm 1-Active Music Engagement (Parents)
Three 45-minute sessions with a board-certified music therapist delivered over three days. Sessions are delivered in a private setting during in-patient hospitalization. During the first visit, parent and child will receive information on common responses of young children to cancer treatment and how parents can use music play activities to support their child during treatment. The music therapist will lead parent and child in a variety of music play activities. Parent and child will receive a music kit that includes items such as hand-held rhythm instruments, puppets, and a music CD. During the second and third visit the music therapist will lead parent and child child through the music play activities, answer questions, and make suggestions for using these activities in the hospital and at home.
69
Arm II- Audio-Storybooks (Parents)
Three 45-minute sessions with a board-certified music therapist delivered over three days. Sessions are delivered in a private setting during in-patient hospitalization. Each session children/parents will choose and listen to one of three illustrated children's books with audio recorded narration.
67
Total272

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyChild Toxicity/Side Effects of Treatment10
Overall StudyDeath10
Overall StudyDyad Became Ineligible01
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up31
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject14

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm II- Audio-Storybooks (Children)Arm 1-Active Music Engagement (Children)Arm 1-Active Music Engagement (Parents)Arm II- Audio-Storybooks (Parents)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
67 Participants69 Participants0 Participants0 Participants136 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants68 Participants67 Participants135 Participants
Child Emotional DistressNA score on a scaleNA score on a scale28.6 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.1
28.6 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8
28.6 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
Child Quality of LifeNA score on a scaleNA score on a scale70.2 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.7
71.1 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
70.6 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
13 Participants8 Participants6 Participants12 Participants39 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
52 Participants58 Participants59 Participants52 Participants221 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants3 Participants4 Participants3 Participants12 Participants
Family FunctionNA score on a scaleNA score on a scale3.9 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
3.8 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
3.9 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
Family NormalcyNA score on a scaleNA score on a scale36.0 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5
37.1 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
36.6 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
Parent Emotional and Traumatic DistressNA score on a scaleNA score on a scale51.6 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.3
52.8 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.3
52.2 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.7
Parent Quality of LifeNA score on a scaleNA score on a scale47.2 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
48.0 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
47.6 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
Parent Self EfficacyNA score on a scaleNA score on a scale78.3 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
80.1 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
79.2 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants3 Participants4 Participants1 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
7 Participants7 Participants8 Participants7 Participants29 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
12 Participants11 Participants7 Participants3 Participants33 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants2 Participants2 Participants2 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
46 Participants46 Participants48 Participants52 Participants192 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
67 participants69 participants69 participants67 participants272 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
31 Participants29 Participants58 Participants61 Participants179 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
36 Participants40 Participants11 Participants6 Participants93 Participants
Stress SymptomsNA score on a scaleNA score on a scale3.4 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7
3.6 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
3.5 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 690 / 671 / 690 / 67
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 690 / 670 / 690 / 67
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 690 / 670 / 690 / 67

Outcome results

Primary

Child Emotional Distress - Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)

Child Emotional Distress is assessed through the Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ-PF98) Mental Health Subscale (Landgraf et al., 1999). This subscale consists of 16 items rated on a 5-point Likert-scale. Scores range from 16 to 80 with lower scores indicating better mental health.

Time frame: Time 2(post-session 3 on day 3) and Time 3 (30-days post-session 3, approximately 33 days)

Population: Parent and child participants were enrolled as a dyad. Parents completed all outcome measures for self and for their child as proxy. Arm 1 had 2 parents who did not complete Time 3 measures leaving only 63 participants for analysis. Arm 2 had one parent who did not complete T2 measures leaving 60 participants for analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1-Active Music EngagementChild Emotional Distress - Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Time 223.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12
Arm 1-Active Music EngagementChild Emotional Distress - Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Time 324.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.1
Arm II- Audio-StorybooksChild Emotional Distress - Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Time 224.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.9
Arm II- Audio-StorybooksChild Emotional Distress - Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)Time 322.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.1
Primary

Child Quality of Life - KINDL.

Child Quality of Life is assessed through the KINDL Questionnaire for Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life in Children. The KINDL consists of 24 parent-report items rated on a 5-point Likert-scale for each subscale. Scores range from 20-100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

Time frame: Time 2(post-session 3 on day 3) and Time 3 (30-days post-session 3, approximately 33 days)

Population: Parent and child participants were enrolled as a dyad. Parents completed all outcome measures for self and for their child as proxy. Arm 1 had 2 parents who did not complete Time 3 measures leaving only 63 participants for analysis. Arm 2 had one parent who did not complete T2 measures leaving 60 participants for analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1-Active Music EngagementChild Quality of Life - KINDL.Time 267.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.1
Arm 1-Active Music EngagementChild Quality of Life - KINDL.Time 370.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.7
Arm II- Audio-StorybooksChild Quality of Life - KINDL.Time 269.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.7
Arm II- Audio-StorybooksChild Quality of Life - KINDL.Time 371.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.7
Primary

Family Function - Family Adaptability and Cohesion Scale (FACES II).

Family Function is assessed through the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Scale II (FACES II), a 30-item scale of items rated using a 5-point Likert scale. Scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores meaning higher family adaptability and cohesion.

Time frame: Time 2(post-session 3 on day 3) and Time 3 (30-days post-session 3, approximately 33 days)

Population: Parent and child participants were enrolled as a dyad. Parents completed all outcome measures for self and for their child as proxy. Arm 1 had 2 parents who did not complete Time 3 measures leaving only 63 participants for analysis. Arm 2 had one parent who did not complete T2 measures leaving 60 participants for analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1-Active Music EngagementFamily Function - Family Adaptability and Cohesion Scale (FACES II).Time 235.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.8
Arm 1-Active Music EngagementFamily Function - Family Adaptability and Cohesion Scale (FACES II).Time 334.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.1
Arm II- Audio-StorybooksFamily Function - Family Adaptability and Cohesion Scale (FACES II).Time 236.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.5
Arm II- Audio-StorybooksFamily Function - Family Adaptability and Cohesion Scale (FACES II).Time 334.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.7
Primary

Family Normalcy Perspective - Family Management Measure (FaMM)

Family Normalcy is assessed through The Family Management Measure (FaMM) - Family Life Difficulty Subscale includes 14-items rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale. Subscale items address parents' perceptions of the extent to which having a child with a chronic condition makes family life difficult. Higher values indicate more difficulty managing the condition. Score range 14 - 70.

Time frame: Time 2(post-session 3 on day 3) and Time 3 (30-days post-session 3, approximately 33 days)

Population: Parent and child participants were enrolled as a dyad. Parents completed all outcome measures for self and for their child as proxy. Arm 1 had 2 parents who did not complete Time 3 measures leaving only 63 participants for analysis. Arm 2 had one parent who did not complete T2 measures leaving 60 participants for analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1-Active Music EngagementFamily Normalcy Perspective - Family Management Measure (FaMM)Time 235.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.8
Arm 1-Active Music EngagementFamily Normalcy Perspective - Family Management Measure (FaMM)Time 334.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.1
Arm II- Audio-StorybooksFamily Normalcy Perspective - Family Management Measure (FaMM)Time 236.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.5
Arm II- Audio-StorybooksFamily Normalcy Perspective - Family Management Measure (FaMM)Time 334.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.7
Primary

Parent Emotional and Traumatic Stress Symptoms - Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R)

Stress Symptoms assessed through the Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R), a 22-item measure that measures traumatic stress symptoms in response to a traumatic event that is specified in the instructions. Parents respond to each item using a 5-point Likert scale. Scores range from 0 to 12 with higher scores indicating greater traumatic stress symptoms.

Time frame: Time 2(post-session 3 on day 3) and Time 3 (30-days post-session 3, approximately 33 days)

Population: Parent and child participants were enrolled as a dyad. Parents completed all outcome measures for self and for their child as proxy. Arm 1 had 2 parents who did not complete Time 3 measures leaving only 63 participants for analysis. Arm 2 had one parent who did not complete T2 measures leaving 60 participants for analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1-Active Music EngagementParent Emotional and Traumatic Stress Symptoms - Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R)Time 22.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Arm 1-Active Music EngagementParent Emotional and Traumatic Stress Symptoms - Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R)Time 34.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.7
Arm II- Audio-StorybooksParent Emotional and Traumatic Stress Symptoms - Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R)Time 22.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Arm II- Audio-StorybooksParent Emotional and Traumatic Stress Symptoms - Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R)Time 34.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.6
Primary

Parent Emotional and Traumatic Stress Symptoms - Profile of Mood States-Short Form (POMS).

Parent Emotional and Traumatic Distress was assessed through the Profile of Mood States - Short Form (POMS-SF) which measures mood disturbance. There are 37 items which respondents rate on a 5-point Likert scale. Scores range from 0 to 148 with higher scores indicating greater mood disturbance.

Time frame: Time 2(post-session 3 on day 3) and Time 3 (30-days post-session 3, approximately 33 days)

Population: Parent and child participants were enrolled as a dyad. Parents completed all outcome measures for self and for their child as proxy. Arm 1 had 2 parents who did not complete Time 3 measures leaving only 63 participants for analysis. Arm 2 had one parent who did not complete T2 measures leaving 60 participants for analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1-Active Music EngagementParent Emotional and Traumatic Stress Symptoms - Profile of Mood States-Short Form (POMS).Time 238.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.6
Arm 1-Active Music EngagementParent Emotional and Traumatic Stress Symptoms - Profile of Mood States-Short Form (POMS).Time 342.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.2
Arm II- Audio-StorybooksParent Emotional and Traumatic Stress Symptoms - Profile of Mood States-Short Form (POMS).Time 242.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.6
Arm II- Audio-StorybooksParent Emotional and Traumatic Stress Symptoms - Profile of Mood States-Short Form (POMS).Time 343.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.4
Primary

Parent Quality of Life - Index of Well Being.

Parent Quality of Life is assessed through the Index of Well-being, a 9-item semantic differential scale describing present life using adjective extremes. Scores range from 7 to 63 with higher scores meaning greater well-being.

Time frame: Time 2(post-session 3 on day 3) and Time 3 (30-days post-session 3, approximately 33 days)

Population: Parent and child participants were enrolled as a dyad. Parents completed all outcome measures for self and for their child as proxy. Arm 1 had 2 parents who did not complete Time 3 measures leaving only 63 participants for analysis. Arm 2 had one parent who did not complete T2 measures leaving 60 participants for analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1-Active Music EngagementParent Quality of Life - Index of Well Being.Time 247.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.1
Arm 1-Active Music EngagementParent Quality of Life - Index of Well Being.Time 348.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.9
Arm II- Audio-StorybooksParent Quality of Life - Index of Well Being.Time 247.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.3
Arm II- Audio-StorybooksParent Quality of Life - Index of Well Being.Time 346.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.2
Primary

Parent Self-Efficacy - Parental Beliefs Scale (PBS).

Parent Self-Efficacy is assessed through the Parental Beliefs Scale (PBS) for Hospitalized Children, a 20-item scale that measures parental beliefs about their confidence in anticipating changes in their hospitalized child's behavior and confidence in their parental role during hospitalization. Scores range from 20-100, with higher scores indicating more positive beliefs.

Time frame: Time 2(post-session 3 on day 3) and Time 3 (30-days post-session 3, approximately 33 days)

Population: Parent and child participants were enrolled as a dyad. Parents completed all outcome measures for self and for their child as proxy. Arm 1 had 2 parents who did not complete Time 3 measures leaving only 63 participants for analysis. Arm 2 had one parent who did not complete T2 measures leaving 60 participants for analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1-Active Music EngagementParent Self-Efficacy - Parental Beliefs Scale (PBS).Time 279.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.8
Arm 1-Active Music EngagementParent Self-Efficacy - Parental Beliefs Scale (PBS).Time 381.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.7
Arm II- Audio-StorybooksParent Self-Efficacy - Parental Beliefs Scale (PBS).Time 281.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.4
Arm II- Audio-StorybooksParent Self-Efficacy - Parental Beliefs Scale (PBS).Time 384.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.7

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026