Skip to content

Conscious Sedation vs General Anesthesia in TAVR Patients

Randomized Prospective Study in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Patients- Conscious Sedation VS. General Anesthesia Examining the Effect on Operative Time

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03084978
Enrollment
0
Registered
2017-03-21
Start date
2017-04-30
Completion date
2019-04-30
Last updated
2019-06-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aortic Stenosis

Brief summary

This is a randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of general anesthesia versus conscious sedation on operative times in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Interventions

PROCEDUREGeneral Anesthesia

General anesthesia by standard endotracheal intubation.

PROCEDUREConscious Sedation

Conscious sedation

Sponsors

Montefiore Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Signed informed consent, signed Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) documentation) 2. Age over 18 years of age. 3. Women of child bearing age must have a negative urine or serum pregnancy test. 4. Clinical indication for a transfemoral aortic valve replacement. 5. English or Spanish speaking 6. No evidence of neurological impairment as defined by a NIHSS ≤ 1 and modified Rankin scale (mRS) ≤ 2 within 7 days prior to randomization.

Exclusion criteria

1. BMI \> 40 2. Diagnosis of severe obstructive sleep apnea based on previous polysomnography, with severe defined as an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) \>30 episodes/hr. 3. High risk for aspiration such as severe esophageal disease (e.g. achalasia, gastroparesis, etc). 4. Inability to lie supine for more than 30 minutes. 5. Marginal femoral vessels with concern for possible conversion to transapical or transaortic access. 6. Patient refusal 7. Patient involved in another research study 8. Psychiatric condition precluding ability to provide informed consent 9. History of clinical stroke within 3 months prior to randomization

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time-on-table<1 day* time to patient on table to surgical drapes down * time to patient on table to when deemed safe for transport by anesthesiologist and surgeon

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of patients with serious adverse eventswithin 30 days* deaths * conversion from sedation to intubation * hypersensitivity reactions
Length of staywithin 30 days* ICU length of stay (days) * Hospital length of stay (days)
Readmissionswithin 30 daysNumber of patients readmitted within 30 days of initial procedure
Contrast usage<1 dayAmount of contrast used in mL for procedure
Fluoroscopy time<1 dayAmount of time fluoroscopy used
Number of Patients with Valve Complicationswithin 30 days* paravalvular leak on echocardiogram * pacemaker requirement * vascular complications requiring reintervention * post-procedure requiring valve dilation

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post-procedure Complicationswithin 30 days* TIA or Stroke * Myocardial Infarction * Bleeding * Infection
Quality of LifeProcedure start to 30 daysKansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire at 30 days

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026