Decision-Making
Conditions
Keywords
Trocar entery, Surgery, Laparoscopic
Brief summary
Several techniques for initial abdominal entry in laparoscopy have been introduced in literature. Various guidelines and recommendations are available on this subject, however, compliance to these are controversial. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the rationale and the process of decision making for first entry technique in laparoscopy.
Detailed description
Several methods, i.e., the Veress needle, open approach using the Hasson trocar and direct trocar insertion without insufflation have been described for initial abdominal entry in laparoscopy. On the other hand, relatively new approaches, e.g., the optical or radially expanding trocars did not become common yet. Despite the advantages of laparoscopic surgery, serious complications can be encountered during the initial entry. Development of a complication, e.g., major vascular and intestinal injury, would affect the outcome of the operation and it may result in conversion to the open approach. Because of low incidence of these complications, it is impossible to show any superiority of one approach to another. In this study, we aimed to analyze the rationale and the process of decision making of a surgeon about initial abdominal entry technique for laparoscopy.
Interventions
OTHERSurvey
Close-ended survey will be performed to the participants. The survey consisted of 18 questions (Appendix). The first six questions (#1-6) were related with respondent's demographical and educational data and experiences of surgical and laparoscopic practices. There were five questions to determine preferred technique for first entry (#7-11), three questions for complications (#12-14), and remaining four questions for safety maneuvers (#15-18).
Sponsors
Umraniye Education and Research Hospital
Study design
Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
OTHER
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* General Surgeons who approve to participate to the study will be included.
Exclusion criteria
* Surgical residents will be excluded from the study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Rationale of choice in decision-making of first abdominal trocar entry method. | through study completion, an average of 1 year | The survey will be performed to participant general surgeons to evaluate rationale of choice in decision-making of first abdominal trocar entry method. |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Outcome results
None listed