Skip to content

Thermal Radiofrequency Versus Neurolytic Saddle Rhizotomyfor Severe Pereneal Cancer Pain

The Role of Selective Thermal Radiofrequency Saddle Rhizotomy In Managing Interactable Malignant Perineal Pain: A Comparative Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03084575
Enrollment
40
Registered
2017-03-21
Start date
2016-02-29
Completion date
2017-06-30
Last updated
2017-03-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Interactable Malignant Perineal Pain

Keywords

neuroaxial rhizolysis -selective rhizolysis-thermal radiofrequency

Brief summary

The control of perineal malignant pain is difficult and challenging for pain physicians. Different modalities have been tried to treat this complex pain syndrome including pharmacotherapy and interventional therapy. Neuroaxial phenol rhizolysis is simple and cheap option. However; for patients with pelvic or rectal neoplasms and intact bowel and bladder sphincteric functions, there are neurosurgical recomendations of selective sacral nerve roots rhizotomy blockade as an alternative to chemical saddle rhizotomy.

Detailed description

40 selected patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups 20 patients each Group 1 RF group: in which patients underwent thermal radio Frequency, selective (unilateral S3, bilateral S4 and S5) saddle rhizotomy. Group 2 phenol group: in which patients underwent hyperbaric chemical saddle rhizotomy using 6% phenol in glycerin.

Interventions

PROCEDUREThermal radio Frequency, selective (unilateral S3, bilateral S4 and S5) saddle rhizotomy

Thermal RF lesioning is done using Bailys RF generator. TRF parameters are 80 C, 120 seconds the TRF lesion is repeated after 180 rotation of the needle tip again after sensory and motor pre-stimulation.

DRUGhyperbaric chemical saddle Rhizotomy (6 % pherol in glycerin)

L5-S1 intrathecal injection of 0.5-1 ml of 6 % pherol in glycerin. The patient is seated in the sitting position with 30-45o leaning backwards to make the posterior sensory roots lowermost.

DEVICEThermal RF lesioning is done using Bailys RF generator

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

assessment will be done by junior stuff who is blind to the technique of intervention

Intervention model description

randomization was done using a computer-generated random numbers with proper concealment in opaque sealed envelopes .

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Cancer patients with moderate to severe perineal pain (VAS \> 40mm over 100 mm scale). * Intractable pain not responding to adequate tolerated opioid therapy + adjuvant therapy after reasonable period of time for at least 4 weeks (Rad and Kallmes, 2011). * Limited life expectancy \< 12 months (Slatakin etal 2003). * Patients are continent to urine and stool (no stomas).

Exclusion criteria

* Uncorrected coagulopathy. * Local or systemic sepsis. * Known allergy to the used medications. * Distorted local anatomy e.g. by advanced local neoplastic growth rendering the procedure technically difficult or hazardous. * Sign of increased intracranial tension (Mintzer and Devarajan, 2012).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in VASbaseline, one month, 3monthsVAS: A 100mm scale, horizontal line with 2 stop ends; the left end means no pain & the right end means the worst impaginable pain. It is a valid and practical scale for assessing chronic pain and for pain researches.
Functional improvementbaseline, one month, 3 monthsFunctional improvement. It is a self-reported analysis for the primary outcome after performing pain interventions. It is divided into four categorie (0-25%) ≈ no or minimal functional improvement, (\> 25% to 50%) ≈ mild improvement, (\>50% to 75%) ≈ moderate improvement, and (\>75% to 100%) ≈ marked improvement
Change in dose of daily drug consuptionbase line, one month, 3 monthsdrug (opioid, pregabalin & amitryptiline) consumption (mg/day) .

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ODIbaseline, one month, 3 months(Oswestry Disability Index): Self-reported questionnaire with 10 sections each with five items designed to assess limitations of various asctivities of daily living.
PGICbaseline, one month and 3 monthsPatient satisfaction (PGIC): Patient Global Impression of Changes

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026