Skip to content

An Innovative Treatment for Cervical Precancer (UH3)

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Cure Rates of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 and Higher (CIN2+) Treated With CO2-based Cryotherapy, CropPen, and Thermoablation (UH3)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03084081
Acronym
UH3
Enrollment
1132
Registered
2017-03-20
Start date
2017-08-01
Completion date
2024-08-15
Last updated
2025-04-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia

Keywords

Human Papilloma Virus (HPV), Cryotherapy, Thermoablation, Thermocoagulation, Low and Middle Income Countries (LMICs)

Brief summary

The purpose of this academic-industrial partnership will compare the CryoPen® and thermoablator to traditional CO2-based cryotherapy for the treatment of cervical precancer in low and middle income countries (LMICs) and investigate whether the cure rates of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 and more severe diagnoses (CIN2+) with these devices are non-inferior compared to that of conventional cryotherapy. The results of this study will affect other research areas by serving as a springboard to exploring treatment alternatives that are amenable to low-resource settings and thus will reach the most vulnerable populations.

Detailed description

Cryotherapy is the current gold standard for treatment of precancerous cervical lesions in low resource settings. However, in recent years a number of issues-particularly the use of compressed gas, which requires storage and replenishment of large and potentially dangerous tanks-have emerged as clear limitations. Two technologies-the LMICs-adapted CryoPen®, manufactured and sold by CryoPen®, Inc. (TX, USA), and the thermoablator commercialized by WISAP Medical Technology (Germany) are treatment options for precancerous cervical lesions that run on electricity and avoid the difficulties associated with compressed gas. The LMIC-adapted CryoPen® (hereafter, CryoPen®) differs from previous cryotherapy methods in that it does not require an external source of gas (a tank), since the gas for cooling is built into the system. Thermoablation (also called thermocoagulation) has been used since the 1970s for treatment of cervical lesions. This is treatment with a probe heated to temperatures of 100 to 120ºC. It is also an effective, inexpensive method that does not require high-level healthcare providers. The purpose of this study is to conduct a randomized non-inferiority clinical trial to compare the CryoPen® and WiSAP thermoablator to CO2-based cryotherapy for the treatment of CIN2 or more severe diagnoses (CIN2+) but excluding microinvasive or invasive cervical cancer. The primary objective is to compare CIN2+ cure rates after treatment with the LMIC-adapted CryoPen®, the WISAP thermoablator, and CO2-based cryotherapy. Women will be recruited from the Salvadorian Social Security Hospital (ISSS) in San Salvador, El Salvador, La Liga Contra el Cancer in Lima, Peru and Hospital Universitario San Ignacio in Bogota, Colombia. All are referral sites for women with abnormal cytology. The investigators will approach approximately 1,602 women with CIN2+ during a 2.5 year enrollment phase (30 months). Assuming an approximately 80% participation rate, approximately 1,281 women will be enrolled- 1,152 (90%) will be eligible for cryotherapy (i.e. no contraindications) and 129 will be ineligible and undergo alternative treatments. The investigators estimate that approximately 20% will be lost to follow-up at the twelve-month visit, so that complete data will be available on a total of 922 women (57.55% of 1,602) treated with either CO2-based cryotherapy, LMIC-adapted CryoPen®, or thermoablation. Eligible women with biopsy-confirmed CIN2+ will undergo HPV genotyping with next-generation sequencing. The specimen is taken prior to treatment to establish a baseline of which HPV types are present. If a different HPV type is present in the post-treatment specimen, this will be classified as a new rather than persistent infection. Testing will be conducted at the National Cancer Institute in Rockville, MD. Women will be randomly assigned to one of three study arms: A. CO2-based cryotherapy (double freeze), B. CryoPen® (single freeze), or C. Thermoablation for 40 seconds at 100ºC. At a pre-treatment visit, consented women will receive a pregnancy test as part of the eligibility criteria for enrollment in the study. Pre-vaginal cultures will be collected to be analyzed for bacterial vaginosis, yeast, gonorrhea and chlamydia. The same cultures will be collected at a 6-week follow-up visit. Consented women will be enrolled and undergo a pelvic exam and visual inspection of the cervix following placement of diluted acetic acid on the cervix. Images of the cervix will be taken with a mobile ODT device will be taken before and after treatment. Women deemed ineligible for cryotherapy will undergo LEEP immediately. In the case of suspected cancer, women will be appropriately referred. Six weeks post-treatment, women who return for a visit for evaluation of treatment side effects; these women will complete a questionnaire to assess the presence of pain or cramps, bleeding, stenosis, watery discharge, malodorous discharge and be evaluated for evidence of cervicitis. In addition, vaginal cultures will be collected and analyzed for bacterial vaginosis, yeast, gonorrhea, and chlamydia. One year post-treatment, women will return for a follow-up visit to determine residual disease, which is the primary endpoint. Residual disease will be determined by colposcopy and four-quadrant biopsies. In addition, VIA, cytology, and high-risk HPV DNA testing with careHPV will be performed. Genotyping and next-generation sequencing will be repeated to differentiate between persistent and new infections. The goal is to evaluate sensitivity of VIA, cytology, and HPV testing post-treatment. Women diagnosed with recurrent/untreated CIN2+ on biopsy will be asked to return to undergo LEEP. Women with suspected cancer on biopsy will be referred to the local cancer hospital for standard of care.

Interventions

DEVICECO2 standard therapy

Standard therapy using carbon dioxide for freezing of tissue

DEVICECryoPen

Provides a means of freezing tissue without the use of gases or liquids

Thermoablation

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Basic Health International
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Southern California
CollaboratorOTHER
Instituto Salvadoreno del Seguro Social
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Hospital Universitario San Ignacio
CollaboratorOTHER
Medical College of Wisconsin
CollaboratorOTHER
Shanxi Bethune Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The Cleveland Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Women aged 18 and older * Biopsy results of CIN2, CIN2-3, CIN3, or high-grade CIN not otherwise specified * Willing and able to provide informed consent * Willing and able to provide permanent or reliable address

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant or plans to become pregnant during study * History of total hysterectomy (verified by medical record or pelvic evaluation) * Previous surgery destructive to the cervix within the last 5 years * Patient not eligible for cryotherapy (lesion \>75% of cervix, lesion extends into canal or there is suspicion for invasive cancer) * Cervix shape disfigured or hard to reach

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Participants With Residual CIN2+12-months post treatmentDiagnosis of recurrent and or untreated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher with cervical cancer diagnosis

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Self-reported PainPain during treatmentPatient pain scores using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale from 0-10 where 0 represents the best outcome (no pain) and 10 represents the worst outcome (worst pain). The underlying construct is pain experienced by the participant.

Countries

China, Colombia, El Salvador

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
CO2 Standard Therapy
Double freeze treatment consists of three-minute freeze, five-minute thaw, three-minute freeze CO2 standard therapy: Standard therapy using carbon dioxide for freezing of tissue
377
CryoPen
Single freeze treatment consists of one five-minute freeze CryoPen: Provides a means of freezing tissue without the use of gases or liquids
377
Thermocoagulator
Thermoablation for 60-seconds at 100 degrees Celsius Thermocoagulator: Thermoablation
378
Total1,132

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCO2 Standard TherapyCryoPenThermocoagulatorTotal
Age, Customized
Mean age in years
36.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
36.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
35.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9
36.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
256 Participants256 Participants257 Participants769 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
121 Participants121 Participants121 Participants363 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
China
256 participants256 participants257 participants769 participants
Region of Enrollment
Colombia
31 participants31 participants31 participants93 participants
Region of Enrollment
El Salvador
90 participants90 participants90 participants270 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
377 Participants377 Participants378 Participants1132 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 3770 / 3770 / 378
other
Total, other adverse events
167 / 377143 / 37764 / 378
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 3770 / 3770 / 378

Outcome results

Primary

Proportion of Participants With Residual CIN2+

Diagnosis of recurrent and or untreated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher with cervical cancer diagnosis

Time frame: 12-months post treatment

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CO2 Standard TherapyProportion of Participants With Residual CIN2+18 Participants
CryoPenProportion of Participants With Residual CIN2+29 Participants
ThermocoagulatorProportion of Participants With Residual CIN2+25 Participants
Secondary

Self-reported Pain

Patient pain scores using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale from 0-10 where 0 represents the best outcome (no pain) and 10 represents the worst outcome (worst pain). The underlying construct is pain experienced by the participant.

Time frame: Pain during treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
CO2 Standard TherapySelf-reported Pain2 units on a scale
CryoPenSelf-reported Pain2 units on a scale
ThermocoagulatorSelf-reported Pain4 units on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026