Skip to content

Frequent Activity Snacks Breaks

Frequent Activity Snacks Breaks - Interrupting Sedentary Behaviour

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03083587
Acronym
FABS
Enrollment
20
Registered
2017-03-20
Start date
2017-02-01
Completion date
2020-08-30
Last updated
2020-09-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Insulin Resistance, Obesity, Sedentary Lifestyle

Brief summary

There is a growing health burden in Sweden and Europe arising from the interrelated sequelae of metabolic disorders comprising impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), obesity and T2DM. Obesity and inactivity are the main drivers of IGT and T2DM and are responsible for up to 8% of health costs and 13% of deaths in Europe, with the risk of co-morbidities rising in parallel with increasing body weight. IGT and T2DM are the paradigm of inactivity-related disorders: the majority of people who have IGT or T2DM are overweight and inactive, with up to 80% being obese. A recent meta-analysis of 42 studies concluded that sedentary time was independently associated with a greater risk of T2D, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease incidence and mortality, and cancer incidence and mortality (breast, colon, colorectal, endometrial and epithelial ovarian cancers) (Ann Intern Med. 2015;162:123-32). A recent systematic review of trials published up to April 2014 identified 16 separate studies and concluded that there is considerable evidence of the positive effects of breaking up prolonged sitting time with light-intensity ambulatory physical activity and standing on postprandial metabolic parameters, including glucose, insulin and triglyceride levels (Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015:47:2053-61). However, to date, all of the published experimental trials describing the beneficial effects of breaking up sitting time on metabolic risk markers have been restricted to acute exposure periods (1-5 days). We will perform a RCT intervention study, which examines the efficacy (clinically relevant responses) and practical implementation of low-impact training in sedentary obese individuals during the day.

Interventions

DEVICEActivity monitoring (ActivePal)

Objective measurements of standing and sitting time

BEHAVIORALExercise

Mild exercise 3 min every half hour

Biopsy under local anesthesia

DEVICEContinuous glucose monitoring

Glucose concentrations during the study period

BEHAVIORALNormal lifestyle

Normal lifestyle

Sponsors

Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
Australian Catholic University
CollaboratorOTHER
Region Stockholm
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Karolinska Institutet
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Sedentary lifestyle, * BMI 30-40 kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

* Unable to read Swedish (for informed consent), * anticoagulant therapy, * unability to perform intervention

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in metabolic health including insulin resistanceChange from baseline and 4 week interventionOral glucose tolerance test including baseline glucose and insulin

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes at the molecular level in skeletal and fat muscle biopsiesChange from baseline and 4 week interventioninsulin signalling cascade, the pathways that regulate protein synthesis and atrophy, as well as the content and function of mitochondria
Changes in gene expressionChange from baseline and 4 week interventionRNA, mRNA, DNA methylation
Changes in physical activityChange from baseline and 4 week interventionObjective measures of standing and sitting
Changes in plasma glucoseChange from baseline and 4 week interventionContinuous glucose monitoring

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026