Skip to content

Pulp Revascularization Versus MTA Apexification

A Comparative Study Between Pulp Revascularization and MTA Apexification in Necrotic Immature Anterior Teeth, A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03083015
Acronym
RCT
Enrollment
66
Registered
2017-03-17
Start date
2012-12-06
Completion date
2015-12-02
Last updated
2017-03-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Necrotic Pulp

Keywords

regeneration, MTA apexification and TAP, revascularization

Brief summary

This study compared the efficiency of pulp revascularization and MTA apexification in the treatment of patients with necrotic immature anterior teeth.

Detailed description

the participants with 66 anterior necrotic immature teeth were randomly assigned into two equal groups with 33 teeth per each, according to regeneration and MTA apexification. At the first visit, all teeth were accessed and irrigated with NaOCl then a TAP was applied as intra-appointment intracanal medication. At the second visit, after removal of the medication with the irrigation, bleeding was initiated into the canal and isolated by the MTA in the orifice in the regeneration group. While in the Apexification group, the MTA was packed apically and all teeth were finally restored with resin composite restorations. The patients were recalled after 1, 3, 6, and 9 months for clinical and radiographic follow up.

Interventions

PROCEDURErevascularization

a sterile sharp needle was used to irritate the apical tissue until bleeding occurred apically in the root canal space so as to create a biological scaffold for the regenerative process

PROCEDUREApexification

a 3-5 mm thickness of MTA using a hand plugger and was verified radiographically.

Sponsors

Enas Ebrahim Sayed
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

For the allocation concealment mechanism, each of 66 papers (each paper was eight folded) numbered from 1 to 66 were, individually packed, in opaque envelopes. Each participant picked an envelope at the beginning of the second visit. The number in the envelope determined which procedure was to be performed for the patient. The partner was to decide the procedure for the operator according to that number.

Intervention model description

participants are allocated at random to receive one of two interventions according to the research plan. In RCT the outcomes are measured, so it is considered a quantitative study . This trial conforms to the Consolidated Standard of Reporting Trials (CONSORT)statement.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
7 Years to 16 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Medically-free patients having immature necrotic anterior teeth (with or without apical periodontitis/abscess) even with previous intervention.

Exclusion criteria

* History of allergy to any of the antibiotics in the tri-mix used in the study * Patients with systemic diseases e.g. Diabetes mellitus, bleeding disorders,… * Psychological disturbance * External / internal root resorption or cystic lesion.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain intensity measures2 daysself reported pain intesity at 4, 12, 24, and 48 hours.(0= no pain and 100=worst pain) with a scale from 0 to 100 after the two visits.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Resolution of periapical pathosis9 monthsRadiographically: by comparing radiolucencies in 9 months postoperative radiograph to the baseline radiograph.
Amount of radiographic increase in root length:baseline and 9 monthsRoot length was measured as a straight line from the cement-enamel junction to the radiographic apex of the tooth in millimeters = (9months follow up length - baseline length)
Amount of radiographic increase in the root dentinal wall thickness:baseline and 9 monthsDentin thickness was measured by =root thickness-pulp space and compared to the baseline radiograph measurements.
Decrease of apical diameter:baseline and 9 monthsthe diameter of the apical foramen was measured in millimeters and compared to the baseline radiograph measurements

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026