Myocardial Ischemia
Conditions
Brief summary
Italy is the European country with the minor penetration of FFR as compared to the number of percutaneous coronary intervention. Accordingly, the Società Italiana di Cardiologia Invasiva (SICI-GISE) conceived and promoted a prospective nationwide study to describe the patterns of the use of FFR in an unselected real-world population and to to assess the reasons, on clinical decision making, driving operators in the use or not of the FFR.
Detailed description
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been validated as a reliable surrogate for inducible ischemia, supporting its use during invasive procedures for functional assessment of coronary lesions. Landmark randomized trials have demonstrated that deferral of nonsignificant lesions based on FFR is not only safe, but also that FFR-guided revascularization is associated with a better clinical outcome up to 2 years, when compared with standard angiography. In spite of the overwhelming evidence of its potential clinical and economic benefits and strong guideline recommendation, the adoption of FFR in the real-world is perceived to vary significantly. Reasons for this disparity are several, but most operators still do rely the most on angiographic eye-balling to decide on the functional significance of coronary lesions and the need for revascularization. Italy is the European country with the minor penetration of FFR as compared to the number of percutaneous coronary intervention. Accordingly, the Società Italiana di Cardiologia Invasiva (SICI-GISE) conceived and promoted a prospective nationwide study to describe the patterns of the use of FFR in an unselected real-world population and to to assess the reasons, on clinical decision making, driving operators in the use or not of the FFR.
Interventions
DEVICEfractional flow reserve performed
assessing fractional flow reserve to drive revascularization
OTHERfractional flow reserve not performed
description of the main reasons leading the operator to not use fractional flow reserve to drive the coronary revascularization
Sponsors
Società Italiana di Cardiologia Invasiva
University Hospital of Ferrara
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE PERFORMED GROUP * age \>18 years * written consent * assessment with FFR of at least one coronary lesion FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE NOT PERFORMED GROUP * age \>18 years * written consent * absence of assessment with FFR of at least one coronary lesion \+ at least one of the following criteria 1. stable coronary artery disease, absence of non-invasive stress test, evidence of coronary lesions between 50%-90% (visual estimation or quantitative coronary analysis) 2. stable coronary artery disease, presence of non-invasive stress test, evidence of coronary lesions between 50%-70% (visual estimation or quantitative coronary analysis) 3. acute coronary syndrome, culprit lesion not identifiable or coronary lesions different from the culprit between 50%-70% (visual estimation or quantitative coronary analysis)
Exclusion criteria
* written consent denied
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| agreement with current guidelines | intra-procedure | percentage of patients receiving a FFR assessment in agreement with current guidelines |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| reasons leading to FFR disuse | intra-procedure | description of the main reasons leading operator to prefer not assessment of coronary |
Countries
Italy
Outcome results
None listed