Skip to content

Alternate Run Study

Investigating the Effect of Alternating Training Load and Footwear Singly or in Combination in Runners: The Alternate Run Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03082651
Enrollment
300
Registered
2017-03-17
Start date
2016-08-01
Completion date
2017-12-01
Last updated
2018-01-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Overuse Injury

Keywords

Running injuries, footwear, alternating load

Brief summary

The proposed study will investigate the effect of alternating footwear model and workout-type on the occurrence of running-related pain. To achieve this goal participants will be randomly assigned into one of four different groups who will perform: 1) the same workout throughout a week in the same running shoe model, 2) alternating workout-types throughout the week in the same shoe model, 3) the same workout throughout a week in alternating shoe models, and 4) alternating workouts in alternating shoes. Participants will be characterized based on body alignment, strength, injury and training history. Pain and injury status will be monitored.

Interventions

OTHERAlternating run training load

Runners will perform a variation of workouts, consisting of interval/speed work, tempo runs, and long-slow distance runs throughout each 7-day period

OTHERAlternating footwear

Runners will be assigned identical training sessions over a 7-day period but will alternate use of two different models of running shoes across successive workouts (Nike Pegasus and Nike Zoom Streak). The Zoom Streak has 10mm less midsole material, a less supportive heel counter and more flexible forefoot providing a more responsive feel to the runner.

OTHERConstant training

Runners will be assigned identical training sessions over a 7-day period.

OTHERConstant footwear

Runners perform runs in two pairs of the same assigned neutral-cushioned running shoe (Nike Pegasus).

Sponsors

University of British Columbia
Lead SponsorOTHER
British Columbia Sports Medicine Research Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects in this study will include adults (men and women) between the ages of 19 and 60, have been running on a regular basis (minimum once per week) over the past 6 months, are able to run for 60 minutes continuously, could tolerate 20-40km per week in training, and have not experienced a running related injury requiring a stoppage of 2-weeks or more in the past 6 months. Only neutral and pronated foot postures (Foot Posture Index between -2 and 8) will be recruited

Exclusion criteria

* have a history of surgery to their plantar fascia or Achilles tendon, * have a diagnosis of osteoarthritis - or other degenerative musculoskeletal disorder - affecting the lower extremity, * take analgesic or anti-inflammatory medication 2 or more times per week over the past 4 weeks, * take part in high impact activities 2 or more times per week during the study period

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Running injuries13-weeksWhen an participant misses 3 consecutive assigned running workouts.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Running-related pain13-weeks11-point numerical rating scale of overall pain associated with running
Region specific running-related pain13-weeksNumerical rating scale for pain at selected anatomical locations: gluteal, low back, groin, thigh, hamstring, knee, calf, Achilles, ankle, foot.
Footwear comfort13-weeks11-point rating of footwear comfort
Run Quality13-weeksStudy specific 11-point measure of how the footwear used affected each run's quality

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026