Skip to content

Symfony Toric Intraocular Lens Visual Outcomes

Visual Outcomes of an Extended Depth of Focus (EDOF) Intraocular Lens (IOL)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03082599
Enrollment
120
Registered
2017-03-17
Start date
2017-02-17
Completion date
2018-04-03
Last updated
2020-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Astigmatism Bilateral, Cataract Bilateral

Brief summary

In July 2016, the FDA approved an extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOL (Tecnis Symfony, Abbott Medical Optics) helping to improve the sharpness of vision at near, intermediate and far distances reducing the need of glasses after cataract surgery. It is available in both a non-toric version and a toric version for patients with astigmatism. The difference between this lens and the multifocal (MIOL) counterpart is that the EDOF, similarly to a monofocal IOL, has one focal point (elongated in the EDOF) while the multifocals have 2 focal points; therefore, having less of a halo and glare problem. Pivotal trial results where Symfony was compared to a monofocal IOL showed similar uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA), better intermediate (77% vs. 34% 20/25 uncorrected intermediate visual acuity - UCIVA) and near vision (Symfony patients were able to read two additional, progressively smaller lines compared to the monofocal IOL).A One potential disadvantage of the EDOF IOL compared to a MIOL is the visual performance at near.B One option to deal with this potential shortcoming is to set the non-dominant eye for a small residual myopic error (-0.50 D)C what is referred to as nano-vision or mini mono-vision.

Interventions

DEVICEPresbyopia and astigmatism correcting intraocular lens

The Symfony Toric IOL (ZXTx) is an extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOL design to improve the sharpness of vision at near, intermediate and far distances reducing the need of glasses after cataract surgery in patients with astigmatism.

Sponsors

Science in Vision
CollaboratorOTHER
Abbott Medical Optics
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Carolina Eyecare Physicians, LLC
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subject is undergoing bilateral cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation. 2. Willing and able to provide written informed consent for participation in the study 3. Willing and able to comply with scheduled visits and other study procedures. 4. Scheduled to undergo standard cataract surgery with topical anesthesia in both eyes within 6-15 days between surgeries. 5. Subjects who require an IOL power in the range of +5.0 D to +34.0 D only. 6. Potential postoperative visual acuity of 0.2 logMAR (20/32 Snellen) or better in both eyes.

Exclusion criteria

1. Severe preoperative ocular pathology: amblyopia, rubella cataract, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, shallow anterior chamber, macular edema, retinal detachment, aniridia or iris atrophy, uveitis, history of iritis, iris neovascularization, medically uncontrolled glaucoma, microphthalmos or macrophthalmos, optic nerve atrophy, macular degeneration (with anticipated best postoperative visual acuity less than 20/30), advanced glaucomatous damage, etc. 2. Uncontrolled diabetes. 3. Use of any systemic or topical drug known to interfere with visual performance. 4. Contact lens use during the active treatment portion of the trial. 5. Any concurrent infectious/non-infectious conjunctivitis, keratitis or uveitis. 6. Clinically significant corneal dystrophy 7. History of chronic intraocular inflammation. 8. History of retinal detachment. 9. Pseudoexfoliation syndrome or any other condition that has the potential to weaken the zonules. 10. Previous intraocular surgery. 11. Previous refractive surgery. 12. Previous keratoplasty 13. Severe dry eye 14. Pupil abnormalities 15. Subject who may reasonably be expected to require a secondary surgical intervention at any time during the study (other than yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG) capsulotomy, i.e. LASIK) 16. Anesthesia other than topical anesthesia (i.e. retrobulbar, general, etc). 17. Any clinically significant, serious or severe medical or psychiatric condition that may increase the risk associated with study participation or may interfere with the interpretation of study results. 18. Participation in (or current participation) any ophthalmic investigational drug or ophthalmic device trial within the previous 30 days prior to the start date of this trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Binocular Distance-corrected Near (40 cm) Visual Acuity.3 monthsVisual acuity with correction (glasses) measured at 40 cm.
Reduction of Manifest Cylinder (Diopters).3 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Uncorrected Intermediate (66 cm) Visual Acuity3 monthsVisual acuity without correction (no glasses) measured at 66 cm.
Uncorrected Near (40 cm) Visual Acuity3 monthsVisual acuity without correction (no glasses) measured at 40 cm.
Uncorrected (4 m) Visual Acuity3 monthsVisual acuity without correction (no glasses) measured at 4 m.
Modified Patient-Reported Visual Symptoms Questionnaire (PRVSQ)3 monthsPercentage of patients who reported any visual symptoms such as halos, glare, starburst, light sensitivity when answering the self administered questionnaire.
Patient Reported Spectacle Independence Questionnaire3 monthsPercentage of participants who reported wearing glasses none or a little of the time in the self administered questionnaire.

Other

MeasureTime frame
Percentage of Eyes With Postoperative Manifest Refraction Spherical Equivalent (MRSE) Accuracy to Target ≤ 0.5D3 months
Residual Refractive Cylinder3 months
Residual Mean Spherical Equivalent Refraction3 months
Residual Refractive Sphere3 months

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 120 patients were enrolled and randomized; however, data from only 79 patients was analyzed due to major procedural issues at one site. One patient in the Emmetropia group missed the 3-month visit.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Emmetropia Both Eyes (OU) Group
Symfony Toric IOL target refraction both eyes emmetropia (±0.25D). Presbyopia and astigmatism correcting intraocular lens: The Symfony Toric IOL (ZXTx) is an extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOL design to improve the sharpness of vision at near, intermediate and far distances reducing the need of glasses after cataract surgery in patients with astigmatism.
40
Nanovision Group
Symfony Toric IOL target refraction for the dominant eye will be plano (±0.25D) and for the non-dominant eye -0.50 ±0.16 D. Presbyopia and astigmatism correcting intraocular lens: The Symfony Toric IOL (ZXTx) is an extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOL design to improve the sharpness of vision at near, intermediate and far distances reducing the need of glasses after cataract surgery in patients with astigmatism.
39
Total79

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEmmetropia Both Eyes (OU) GroupNanovision GroupTotal
Age, Continuous68.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
69.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
68.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
40 Participants39 Participants79 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
37 Participants36 Participants73 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
40 Participants39 Participants79 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
23 Participants17 Participants40 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants22 Participants39 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 400 / 39
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 400 / 39
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 400 / 39

Outcome results

Primary

Binocular Distance-corrected Near (40 cm) Visual Acuity.

Visual acuity with correction (glasses) measured at 40 cm.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: One subject in the emmetropia group missed the Month 3 visit.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Emmetropia Both Eyes (OU) GroupBinocular Distance-corrected Near (40 cm) Visual Acuity.0.30 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.14
Nanovision GroupBinocular Distance-corrected Near (40 cm) Visual Acuity.0.26 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.13
Primary

Reduction of Manifest Cylinder (Diopters).

Time frame: 3 months

Population: One subject in the emmetropia group missed the Month 3 visit.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Emmetropia Both Eyes (OU) GroupReduction of Manifest Cylinder (Diopters).1.15 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.77
Nanovision GroupReduction of Manifest Cylinder (Diopters).1.38 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.8
Secondary

Modified Patient-Reported Visual Symptoms Questionnaire (PRVSQ)

Percentage of patients who reported any visual symptoms such as halos, glare, starburst, light sensitivity when answering the self administered questionnaire.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: One subject in the emmetropia group missed the Month 3 visit.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Emmetropia Both Eyes (OU) GroupModified Patient-Reported Visual Symptoms Questionnaire (PRVSQ)100 percentage of participants
Nanovision GroupModified Patient-Reported Visual Symptoms Questionnaire (PRVSQ)97.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Patient Reported Spectacle Independence Questionnaire

Percentage of participants who reported wearing glasses none or a little of the time in the self administered questionnaire.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: One subject in the emmetropia group missed the Month 3 visit.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Emmetropia Both Eyes (OU) GroupPatient Reported Spectacle Independence Questionnaire64.8 percentage of participants
Nanovision GroupPatient Reported Spectacle Independence Questionnaire92.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Uncorrected (4 m) Visual Acuity

Visual acuity without correction (no glasses) measured at 4 m.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: One subject in the emmetropia group missed the Month 3 visit.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Emmetropia Both Eyes (OU) GroupUncorrected (4 m) Visual Acuity-0.03 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.08
Nanovision GroupUncorrected (4 m) Visual Acuity-0.02 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.08
Secondary

Uncorrected Intermediate (66 cm) Visual Acuity

Visual acuity without correction (no glasses) measured at 66 cm.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: One subject in the emmetropia group missed the Month 3 visit.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Emmetropia Both Eyes (OU) GroupUncorrected Intermediate (66 cm) Visual Acuity0.06 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.1
Nanovision GroupUncorrected Intermediate (66 cm) Visual Acuity0.04 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.08
Secondary

Uncorrected Near (40 cm) Visual Acuity

Visual acuity without correction (no glasses) measured at 40 cm.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: One subject in the emmetropia group missed the Month 3 visit.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Emmetropia Both Eyes (OU) GroupUncorrected Near (40 cm) Visual Acuity0.25 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.12
Nanovision GroupUncorrected Near (40 cm) Visual Acuity0.19 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.12
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Eyes With Postoperative Manifest Refraction Spherical Equivalent (MRSE) Accuracy to Target ≤ 0.5D

Time frame: 3 months

Population: One subject in the emmetropia group missed the Month 3 visit.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Emmetropia Both Eyes (OU) GroupPercentage of Eyes With Postoperative Manifest Refraction Spherical Equivalent (MRSE) Accuracy to Target ≤ 0.5D100 percentage of eyes
Nanovision GroupPercentage of Eyes With Postoperative Manifest Refraction Spherical Equivalent (MRSE) Accuracy to Target ≤ 0.5D88.4 percentage of eyes
Other Pre-specified

Residual Mean Spherical Equivalent Refraction

Time frame: 3 months

Population: One subject in the emmetropia group missed the Month 3 visit.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Emmetropia Both Eyes (OU) GroupResidual Mean Spherical Equivalent Refraction-0.20 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.22
Nanovision GroupResidual Mean Spherical Equivalent Refraction-0.33 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.33
Other Pre-specified

Residual Refractive Cylinder

Time frame: 3 months

Population: One subject in the emmetropia group missed the Month 3 visit.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Emmetropia Both Eyes (OU) GroupResidual Refractive Cylinder0.20 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.25
Nanovision GroupResidual Refractive Cylinder0.29 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.27
Other Pre-specified

Residual Refractive Sphere

Time frame: 3 months

Population: One subject in the emmetropia group missed the Month 3 visit.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Emmetropia Both Eyes (OU) GroupResidual Refractive Sphere-0.30 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.2
Nanovision GroupResidual Refractive Sphere-0.48 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.37

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026