Skip to content

Central Obesity and Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Central Obesity and the Prognosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Microwave Ablation

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03082378
Enrollment
200
Registered
2017-03-17
Start date
2017-03-01
Completion date
2019-12-31
Last updated
2017-03-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Microwave Ablation, Obesity

Brief summary

Recurrence and metastases after microwave ablation(MWA) of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) are the major factors that influence the survival. Obesity has been reported was significantly correlated with increased risk of developing HCC. In this study, we will analysis the association of multiple obesity index(waist circumference,waist-hip ratio and body mass index) with the prognosis of HCC treated by MWA.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Chinese PLA General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CROSSOVER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* absence of ascites or the depth of ascites on US detection less than 4 cm; * a normal serum total bilirubin level or less than 60 µmol/L; * a normal albumin level or not less than 30 g/L; * for radical treatment, single lesion of 8 cm or smaller, three or fewer multiple lesions with a maximum diameter of 4 cm or less, absence of portal vein cancerous thrombus or extrahepatic metastases; * for palliative treatment, those with large or multiple lesions, suffering multiple metastases and unsuitable for other modalities can be considered to undergo the MWA on the condition of good hepatic function and blood coagulation function to tolerate the procedure.

Exclusion criteria

1. clinical evident liver failure, such as massive ascites or hepatic encephalopathy or with a trance-like state 2. severe blood coagulation dysfunction (prothrombin time of more than 30 seconds, prothrombin activity less than 40%, and platelet count less than 30 cells×109/L) 3. high intrahepatic tumor burden (tumor volume \>70% of the target liver volume or multiple tumor nodules) or high extrahepatic tumor burden 4. acute or active inflammatory and infectious lesions at any organ 5. acute or severe chronic renal failure, pulmonary insufficiency or heart dysfunction 6. relative contraindication concerns medical risk for the tumor proximity to diaphragm, gastrointestinal tract, gallbladder, pancreas, hepatic hilum and major bile duct or vessels, which may require adjunctive techniques to prevent off-target heating of adjacent structures during the ablation procedure.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
survival3 yearsPercentage of participants who survived up to end time point as assessed by Kaplan-Meier

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
intra-hepatic metastasis3 yearsPercentage of participants who present metastasis in the liver up to end time point as assessed by Kaplan-Meier
extra-hepatic metastasis3 yearsPercentage of participants who present metastasis outside the liver up to end time point as assessed by Kaplan-Meier
local tumor progression3 yearsPercentage of participants who present tumor progression around the ablation zone up to end time point as assessed by Kaplan-Meier
complication3 yearsnumber of participants with side effect and major complication

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactJie Yu, Dr
yu-jie301@hotmail.com66939530
Backup ContactMeng-juan Mu, BM
mmj869900@163.com66939530

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026