Skip to content

Comparison of da Vinci Simulator vs LapSim Simulator

Comparison of the da Vinci Skills Simulator and the LapSim Laparoscopy Simulator for Conventional Laparoscopic Skills Improvement: a Prospective, Randomized Trial

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03079908
Enrollment
0
Registered
2017-03-15
Start date
2017-08-15
Completion date
2018-06-30
Last updated
2018-03-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Laparoscopy Training, Robotic Surgery Training

Keywords

Laparoscopy, Surgery, Training, Virtual reality, Simulation, Robotic Surgery, Da Vinci

Brief summary

Virtual reality surgical simulators (VRSS) are gaining popularity for general surgery training, both for conventional laparoscopic and robotically-assisted surgery. Although numerous studies have analysed the impact of VRSS training on surgical skills, there is a lack of data regarding the comparison of robotic VRSS (RVRSS) and laparoscopic VRSS (LVRSS) training on conventional laparoscopic skills among subjects with no prior surgical experience. The hypothesis of the present study is that RVRSS could improve conventional laparoscopic skills as much as laparoscopic LVRSS among naïve subjects

Interventions

OTHERda Vinci Skills Simulator®

Initial robotic virtual reality surgical simulator Training (da Vinci Skills Simulator ® System), then laparoscopic dry box evaluation

OTHERLapSim®

Initial laparoscopic virtual reality surgical simulator training (LapSim ® System), then laparoscopic dry box evaluation

OTHERDry lab box laparoscopic training

No initial simulator training. Dry lab box laparoscopic Training only.

Sponsors

Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Department Chirurgie, Luzerner Kantonsspital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy medical students aged 20 to 30 years old

Exclusion criteria

* No prior surgical, laparoscopic or robotic experience * No previously known severe learning disability or mental deficiency * No handicap limiting the usage of one or both upper limb(s)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Exercises timesWithin 1 day after randomization / data will be presented after completion of the study (an average of 9 months)Time to realize each training exercise as well as the final evaluation exercise

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objects dropsWithin 1 day after randomization / data will be presented after completion of the study (an average of 9 months)Number of time objects were unwillingly dropped during each training exercise as well as the final evaluation exercise
Objects out of viewWithin 1 day after randomization / data will be presented after completion of the study (an average of 9 months)Number of times one or both instruments or objects used for the exercises were out of the viewing field during each training exercise as well as the final evaluation exercise
Instruments collisionsWithin 1 day after randomization / data will be presented after completion of the study (an average of 9 months)Number of collisions between the different instruments used to perform each training exercise as well as the final evaluation exercise

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026