Skip to content

Manual Versus Electric Vacuum Aspiration for Pregnancy Termination Between 10-14 Weeks

Manual Versus Electric Vacuum Aspiration for Pregnancy Termination Between 10-14 Weeks: A Randomized Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03079622
Enrollment
146
Registered
2017-03-14
Start date
2015-11-30
Completion date
2016-06-30
Last updated
2017-03-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Abortion in First Trimester

Brief summary

The study titled, Manual Versus Electric Vacuum Aspiration for Pregnancy Termination Between 10-14 weeks: A Randomized Trial, is a randomized trial to compare procedure times for manual and electric vacuum aspiration for surgical abortion between 10 0/7 and 13 6/7 weeks gestation. Women presenting for surgical abortion between 10 0/7 and 13 6/7 weeks gestation will be randomized to either undergo manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) or electric vacuum aspiration (EVA). The investigators hypothesize that operative times will be increased when using manual vacuum aspiration, as compared to electric vacuum aspiration, for surgical abortion performed in the late first trimester (10 0/7 and-13 6/7 weeks).

Interventions

PROCEDUREElectric Vacuum Aspiration

Sponsors

Washington University School of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Between 10 0/7 and 13 6/7 weeks of gestation * Documented intra-uterine pregnancy * Presenting for surgical induced abortion at RHS * English-speaking * Age 18 or older

Exclusion criteria

* Spontaneous abortion * Failed medical abortion * Multiple gestation * Uterine anomalies * Lower uterine segment or cervical myomas * History of 3 or more prior cesarean deliveries * BMI \> 40 * Having the abortion procedure performed by a provider who does not perform MVA and EVA between 10 0/7 and 13 6/7 weeks

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Operative timePerioperativeTime from cannula insertion until completion of uterine evacuation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Conversion from electric to manual vacuum aspiration (or vice versa) during the procedurePerioperative
Patient acceptabilityPerioperative and 2 weeks postoperatively1\) Satisfaction with procedure on 4-point rating scale 2) Would choose same procedure again (binary response) 3) Would recommend procedure to a friend (binary response)
Provider acceptabilityPerioperative1\) Ease of procedure on a 5 point Likert scale, 2) Appropriateness of method used for procedure (binary response)

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026