Skip to content

Improving Antimicrobial Prescribing Practices in the Neonatal ICU

Improving Antimicrobial Prescribing Practices in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03079245
Acronym
iNAP
Enrollment
6184
Registered
2017-03-14
Start date
2009-05-01
Completion date
2012-04-30
Last updated
2017-03-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infants in Neonatal Intensive Care Units

Keywords

Neonatal ICU, antimicrobial stewardship

Brief summary

To determine if 3 randomly assigned bundles of stewardship interventions would reduce overall and inappropriate antimicrobial use in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), a pre-post study was performed in 4 NICUs.

Detailed description

Antimicrobial stewardship can improve the safety and quality of healthcare, reduce antimicrobial resistance, and reduce healthcare costs. However, the optimal strategies for the NICU population are unknown and few studies have evaluated the impact of stewardship in this population. To determine if 3 randomly assigned bundles of stewardship interventions would reduce overall and inappropriate antimicrobial use in the NICU. The investigators hypothesized that the bundle using all three interdisciplinary antimicrobial stewardship strategies (education, computer decision support and prescriber audit and feedback) would more effectively reduce overall and inappropriate antimicrobial use compared to usual care. A pre-post intervention study (one baseline year without interventions - May 1, 2009 - April 30, 2010, followed by two years of interventions - May 1, 2010 - April 30, 2012) was performed in 4 academically affiliated, level III NICUs. The sites were randomly assigned to usual care, one intervention, two interventions, or three interventions.

Interventions

OTHEREducation Plus (E+)

Education Plus was an intervention developed by the study team based on the Center for Disease Control (CDC) 12 Step Campaign to Prevent Antimicrobial Resistance in Healthcare Settings. The study team provided Education Plus quarterly to prescribers at the three sites (NICU A, B, C) randomized to this intervention. Examples of topics presented were an overview of antimicrobial stewardship principles, epidemiology of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), prevention of surgical site infections, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, and pharmacokinetic principles. Educational formats included didactic lectures, participation via the audience response system, case vignettes, and panel discussions.

OTHERClinical Decision Support

The CDS tool was an intervention developed in consultation with neonatologists and pediatric infectious disease physicians from NICU A and B. Algorithms for empiric and targeted antimicrobial therapy for common pathogens and common clinical scenarios using local antimicrobial susceptibility patterns were developed. The CDS tool also provided additional components to facilitate antimicrobial prescribing, e.g., patient weight, day of life, previous culture results, antimicrobial orders, and selected laboratory results including white blood cell and platelet count, C-reactive protein, creatinine, and therapeutic drug levels. NICUs A and B also received E+

OTHERPrescriber Audit and Feedback

The prescriber audit and feedback (PAF) intervention was developed by the study team which held focus groups with neonatologists at NICU A (the site randomized to this intervention) to determine the feedback parameters and feedback format as previously described. Neonatologists at NICU A were provided aggregated prescribing data bimonthly that described inappropriate use as described below and prolonged therapy (\>7 days) for culture-negative late onset sepsis. NICU A also received CDS and E+.

Sponsors

National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
CollaboratorNIH
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
CollaboratorOTHER
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
CollaboratorOTHER
Christiana Care Health Services
CollaboratorOTHER
Columbia University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

A pre-post intervention study followed by two years of use of randomly assigned interventions

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* infants admitted to study NICUs \<7 days of age who remained hospitalized 4 days or more days

Exclusion criteria

* Infants admitted to study NICUs 7 days of age and older who were hospitalized less than 4 days

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Antimicrobial Use measured as days of therapy per 100 patient-daysThrough study completion for 2 yearsThe indications for initiation of intravenous antimicrobials were categorized as initiation of empiric therapy (antibiotics started prior to culture results), definitive therapy (culture results available prior to initiation of antibiotics), or prophylaxis (e.g., antibiotics for postoperative prophylaxis).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Length of therapy per 100 patient-daysThrough study completion for 2 years2 agents received on same day counted as one day
Inappropriate Antimicrobial UseThrough study completion for 2 yearsDetermined on 4th calendar-day of treatment as redundant therapy and failure to target the pathogen
Number of infants initiated on ineffective empiric therapyThrough study completion for 2 yearsInitiation of ineffective empiric therapy for infants thought to be infected
Proportion of infants treated for culture negative late onset sepsisThrough study completion for 2 yearsThe proportion of infants treated for culture negative late onset sepsis lasting more than 7 days

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026