Skip to content

Gingival Bleeding and Von Willebrand Disease Typ 2 and 3

Is Gingival Bleeding a Symptom of Patients With Type 2 and 3 Von Willebrand Disease? A Case-Control Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03078595
Enrollment
48
Registered
2017-03-13
Start date
2015-07-16
Completion date
2017-04-04
Last updated
2020-02-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gingival Bleeding, Von Willebrand Diseases

Keywords

periodontal disease, plaque-induced gingivitis, bleeding on probing, von willebrand disease, gingival bleeding

Brief summary

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherent bleeding disorder resulting in prolonged bleeding time. Gingival bleeding is a frequently reported symptom of VWD. However, gingival bleeding is also known as a leading symptom of plaque-induced gingivitis and untreated periodontal disease. Gingival bleeding in VWD patients may be triggered by gingival inflammation and not a genuine symptom. Thus, this study evaluates whether type 2 and 3 VWD determines an increased susceptibility to gingival bleeding in response to the oral biofilm.

Detailed description

Patients All patients with type 2 and 3 VWD consecutively consulting the Haemophilia Centre, Medical Clinic III/Institute for Transfusion medicine, Hospital of the Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main are asked to participate in this study as cases. They are asked for bleeding and subjective symptoms indicating periodontal disease. The study complies with the rules of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board for Human Studies of the Medical Faculty of the Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main (Application# 143/15). All participating individuals are informed on risks and benefits as well as the procedures of the study and give written informed consent. Controls For each case (VWD) a respective hematologically healthy control is recruited from the gingivitis and periodontitis patients of the Department of Periodontology, Centre for Dentistry and Oral Medicine (Carolinum), Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main. Each control is matched to one of the respective cases for sex, age (±5 years), self-reported smoking status (current smoker/non-smoker), number of remaining teeth (±2 teeth), and periodontal diagnosis (gingivitis, chronic or aggressive periodontitis). All participants are asked about current and past cigarette smoking habits. Patients who report smoking or have quit smoking for less than five years are classified as smokers. Additionally the amount of carbon monoxide (CO) in exhaled air is measured using a device (Bedfont Smokerlyzer; Bedfont Scientific Ltd, Rochester, Great Britain). Hematologic examinations 20 ml of blood are sampled from an arm vein. The following data are assessed at the Haemophilia Centre for clinical routine during VWD patient care and due to study design in the controls: * von Willebrand parameters (VWF antigen \[VWF:Ag\], Ristocetin cofactor \[VWF:RCo\], coagulation factor VIII \[FVIII:C\]) * Current medication if any VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo were measured turbidimetrically using a device (BCS, Siemens, Marburg, Germany). FVIII:C was assessed with specific agents on a coagulation analyser (ACL-300®, Instrumentation Laboratory, Kirchheim, Germany). Periodontal examinations The following clinical parameters are assessed at 6 sites per tooth (mesiobuccal, buccal, distobuccal, mesiolingual, lingual, distolingual): * modified Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI) * modified Plaque Control Record (PCR) * PPD and recession to the nearest 0.2 mm using an electronic probe (Florida Probe, Version 3.2, Gainesville, USA). Recession is assessed from the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) to the gingival margin. At sites where the CEJ was destroyed by restorations the restoration margin (RM) is used as reference. At sites where the CEJ or RM is located apically from the gingival margin the value for recession is negative * Bleeding on probing (BOP) recorded as positive when bleeding occurs within 30 seconds from probing. For each patient a BOP index is calculated providing the amount of sites with positive BOP in % per patient. Attachment loss (PAL-V) is calculated as sum of PPD and recession. All individuals are classified into the following diagnoses: * plaque-induced gingivitis (PPD \< 3.6 mm; PAL-V ≤ 2 mm), * generalized mild, localized moderate chronic periodontitis (PPD ≥ 3.6 mm; vertical probing attachment level \[PAL-V\] 3 to 4 mm ≤ 30% of sites; 1 to 2 mm \> 30% of sites), * generalized mild, localized severe chronic periodontitis (PPD ≥ 3.6 mm; PAL-V ≥ 5 mm ≤ 30% of sites; 1 to 2 mm \> 30% of sites) * generalised moderate chronic periodontitis (PPD ≥ 3.6 mm; PAL-V 3 to 4 mm \> 30%) * generalised moderate localised severe chronic periodontitis (PPD ≥ 3.6 mm; PAL-V 3 to 4 mm \> 30%; ≥ 5 mm ≤ 30%) In all individuals hematological and periodontal examinations are obtained within 24 hours. After dental and periodontal examination all patients receive oral hygiene instructions and professional tooth cleaning. In cases of untreated periodontal disease periodontal treatment is offered. VWD are asked to report any bleeding complications after periodontal probing and professional tooth cleaning. Statistical analysis The individual patient is used as statistical unit. All analyses are performed on patient level. GBI is defined as the main outcome variable and BOP as secondary outcome variable. All other parameters are control variables. Up to now there are no studies comparing GBI or BOP between VWD type 2 and 3 cases and hematologically healthy controls and there are no standard deviations of mean GBI and BOP for cases and controls. To detect a clinically relevant inter-group difference of 4% GBI or BOP with a type 1 error alpha \< 0.05 and a test power of 80% with a standard deviation of group means of 5.5% a sample size of at least 31 individuals is required per group. Thus, it was decided to recruit 31 VWD cases and respectively matched 31 controls. For all individuals, cigarette pack years are calculated. Group frequencies (VWD, control) are expressed for sex, current smoking. Group means and standard deviations are calculated for GBI, BOP, age, number of remaining teeth, pack years, CO, PCR, VWF:Ag, VWF:RCO, FVIII:C. Further, for each individual the following variables are calculated to describe the periodontal status: * Mean±standard deviation of PPD and PAL-V * Percentage of PPD \< 4 mm, 4 to 6.8 mm, ≥ 7 mm * Sum of all PPD, i.e. the sum of the PPD measured at all sites within a patient * Sum of all PPD with BOP, ), i.e. the sum of the PPD measured at all sites exhibiting BOP within a patient * Periodontal inflamed surface area (PISA). For each patient PPD were entered into an Excel sheet that can be downloaded freely (http://www.parsprototo.info/pisa.html). From these group means and standard deviations are calculated. Comparisons between groups for dichotomous parameters are made by χ² or Fisher's exact test and for all other parameters by Mann-Whitney-U test. A post-hoc analysis is performed to estimate the test power that would be required to find a clinically relevant inter-group difference (δ) of 5% for GBI and BOP index with a type 1 error (α) of 0.05 for the actual sample size. Using stepwise linear backward multiple regression analysis, factors shall be identified that influence GBI and BOP. The following independent variables are entered into the model for GBI: group (VWD/control), sex, age, number of remaining teeth, PCR, CO, pack years, PISA. The following independent variables are entered into the model for BOP: group (VWD/control), sex, age, number of remaining teeth, PCR, CO, pack years, PISA. Due to the fact that mean PPD is mathematically coupled to sum of PPD, sum of PPD with BOP, and PISA these 4 variables are not entered into the regression model at the same time. PISA provides the best representation of the subgingival inflamed area. Thus, PISA is chosen for the final model. The following parameters are described by dummy variables: group (control = 0, VWD = 1), sex (male = 0, female = 1), smoking status (never and former smoker = 0, current smoker = 1). All factors with p \< 0.1 are kept in the models. For statistical analysis a PC program is used (SystatTM for Windows Version 12, Systat Inc., Evanston, USA).

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Goethe University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

von Willebrand Patients: * 18 - 80 years old * no other bleeding disorder except 2 and 3 von Willebrand disease Inclusion Criteria healthy controls: * no bleeding disorder * no anticoagulative medication

Exclusion criteria

von Willebrand Patients: \- requirement of systemic antibiotics for measures that may cause transitory bacteraemia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bleeding on Probing (BOP)cross-sectional: only one assessment at the time of examinationUsing a periodontal probe probing pocket depths (PPD) are assessed with a force of 0.2 N at 6 sites per tooth (mesio-buccal, buccal, disto-buccal, disto-oral, oral, mesio-oral). After 30 seconds bleeding on probing is scored at each site. The frequency of bleeding sites of the total number of assessed sites is calculated as index.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI)cross-sectional: only one assessment at the time of examinationA periodontal probe is gently moved through the gingival sulcus. Bleeding is assessed at 6 sites per tooth (mesio-buccal, buccal, disto-buccal, disto-oral, oral, mesio-oral). The frequency of bleeding sites of the total number of assessed sites is calculated as index.

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Recruitment details

At the Haemophilia Centre, Medical Clinic III/Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Hospital of the Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main approximately 1500 charts of VWD patients were screened rendering about 35 patients with VWD type 2 and 3.

Pre-assignment details

From July 16, 2015 to July 15, 2016 24 type 2 and 3 VWD cases were enrolled. Due to the difficulty to find more type 2 and 3 VWD patients willing to participate recruitment was stopped in March 2017 after enrolment of 24 individuals. From April 04, 2016 to March 24, 2017 24 patients that self-reported to be hematologically healthy were enrolled.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Von Willebrand Disease Type 2 and 3
Examinations (haematologically and periodontally) of von Willebrand disease patients with type 2 and 3 and healthy controls to evaluate whether type 2 and 3 VWD determines an increased susceptibility to gingival bleeding in response to the oral biofilm
24
Controls
For each case (VWD) a respective haematologically healthy control is recruited from the gingivitis and periodontitis patients of the Department of Periodontology, Centre for Dentistry and Oral Medicine (Carolinum), Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main. Each control is matched to one of the respective cases for sex, age (±5 years), self-reported smoking status (current smoker/non-smoker), number of remaining teeth (±2 teeth), and periodontal diagnosis (gingivitis, chronic or aggressive periodontitis).
24
Total48

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalVon Willebrand Disease Type 2 and 3Controls
activated matrix metalloproteinase 8 (aMMP8)16 participants8 participants8 participants
Age, Continuous46.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
45.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8
46.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4
Body weight70.0 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
71.6 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.1
68.5 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
current smokers14 participants7 participants7 participants
exhaled carbon monoxide (CO)3.4 ppm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4
3.9 ppm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6
2.8 ppm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.4
Factor VIII92.7 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 53.2
55.6 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 46.3
129.8 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.5
generalized mild, localized moderate chronic periodontitis10 participants5 participants5 participants
generalized mild, localized severe chronic periodontitis6 participants3 participants3 participants
generalized moderate chronic periodontitis4 participants2 participants2 participants
generalized moderate localized severe chronic periodontitis6 participants3 participants3 participants
Gingivitis22 participants11 participants11 participants
HbA1C5.1 percent of gycated hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
5.1 percent of gycated hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
5 percent of gycated hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4
Number of teeth26.7 number of teeth
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
26.7 number of teeth
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9
26.8 number of teeth
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2
Pack years (1 pack-year is equal to smoking 20 cigarettes (1 pack) per day for 1 year)2.4 pack years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
3.3 pack years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4
1.6 pack years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9
Periodontal inflamed surface area145.3 mm²
STANDARD_DEVIATION 109.8
154.4 mm²
STANDARD_DEVIATION 124
136.1 mm²
STANDARD_DEVIATION 95.3
Plaque Control Record51.3 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.3
53 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.1
49.5 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.9
PPD < 4 mm98.6 percent of sites
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.6
98.5 percent of sites
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8
98.7 percent of sites
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.4
PPD 4 to 6.8 mm1.4 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.6
1.5 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8
1.3 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.4
Probing Pocket Depth1.9 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
1.8 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
1.9 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
34 Participants17 Participants17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants7 Participants7 Participants
Sum of PPD with BOP52.1 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 33
54.4 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 37.8
49.7 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.1
Sum of probing pocket depth (PPD)300.8 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 94.5
295 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 102.6
306.7 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 87.6
vertical Probing Attachment Level1.9 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
1.9 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
1.8 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9
Von Willebrand activity73.4 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 60.7
24.7 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.4
122.1 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 45.1
Von Willebrand antigen83.0 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 60.6
44 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 45.9
122.1 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 47.2

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 240 / 24
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 240 / 24
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 240 / 24

Outcome results

Primary

Bleeding on Probing (BOP)

Using a periodontal probe probing pocket depths (PPD) are assessed with a force of 0.2 N at 6 sites per tooth (mesio-buccal, buccal, disto-buccal, disto-oral, oral, mesio-oral). After 30 seconds bleeding on probing is scored at each site. The frequency of bleeding sites of the total number of assessed sites is calculated as index.

Time frame: cross-sectional: only one assessment at the time of examination

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Von Willebrand Disease Type 2 and 3Bleeding on Probing (BOP)14.5 percentage of sitesStandard Deviation 10.1
ControlsBleeding on Probing (BOP)12.3 percentage of sitesStandard Deviation 5.3
Secondary

Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI)

A periodontal probe is gently moved through the gingival sulcus. Bleeding is assessed at 6 sites per tooth (mesio-buccal, buccal, disto-buccal, disto-oral, oral, mesio-oral). The frequency of bleeding sites of the total number of assessed sites is calculated as index.

Time frame: cross-sectional: only one assessment at the time of examination

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Von Willebrand Disease Type 2 and 3Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI)10.5 percentage of sitesStandard Deviation 9.9
ControlsGingival Bleeding Index (GBI)8.8 percentage of sitesStandard Deviation 4.8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026