Skip to content

Skeletal Muscle Diacylglycerol and Sphingolipids - Impact of Localization and Species on Insulin Resistance in Humans

Skeletal Muscle Diacylglycerol and Sphingolipids - Impact of Localization and Species on Insulin Resistance in Humans

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03077360
Enrollment
62
Registered
2017-03-10
Start date
2017-02-01
Completion date
2020-11-19
Last updated
2026-07-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Obesity, Pre-diabetes

Brief summary

The rationale for the proposed research is that elucidating changes in localized diacylglycerol (DAG) and sphingolipid species that predict insulin sensitivity will reveal specific localized lipids to target in therapeutics for type 2 diabetes. To attain the overall objective, the investigators propose three specific aims: 1. Identify the influence of sarcolemmal DAG and sphingolipids on cell signaling and insulin sensitivity before and after insulin sensitizing lifestyle interventions. Strong preliminary data shape the hypothesis that sarcolemmal 1,2-disaturated DAG and C18:0 ceramide species will decrease after insulin sensitizing lifestyle interventions, leading to less Protein kinase C (PKC) and Protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) activation, and enhanced insulin signaling. Skeletal muscle DAG and sphingolipid isomers, species, localization, and de novo synthesis will be measured before and after diet-induced weight loss or exercise training interventions in obese men and women. Insulin sensitivity will be measured using insulin clamps, and muscle lipids using Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (LC/MS). 2. Determine the impact of mitochondrial/ER (endoplasmic reticulum) DAG and sphingolipids on mitochondrial function and ER stress in vivo, before and after insulin sensitizing lifestyle interventions. The investigators hypothesize, again based on preliminary data, that mitochondrial/ER sphingolipids will decrease, yet DAG will increase after insulin sensitizing lifestyle interventions, and each will associate with increased insulin sensitivity. Changes in sphingolipids will relate to increased mitochondrial function, less ER stress, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and acyl-carnitine formation, while changes in DAG will relate to increased mitochondrial content and dynamics. 3. Identify the effect of exogenous DAG and sphingolipids on mitochondrial function in vitro, before and after insulin sensitizing lifestyle interventions. The working hypothesis is that DAG and sphingolipids will reduce mitochondrial respiration and increase ROS and acyl-carnitine content, but will be attenuated after endurance exercise training. The proposed research is innovative because it represents a substantive departure from the status quo by addressing cellular compartmentalization of bioactive lipids. The investigators contribution will be significant by identifying key species and locations of DAG and sphingolipids promoting insulin resistance, as well as mechanisms explaining accumulation that could be modified by insulin sensitizing therapeutic interventions.

Detailed description

Accumulation of bioactive lipids such as diacylglycerol (DAG) and sphingolipids are one mechanism proposed to promote muscle insulin resistance. Recent data indicate these lipids are located in membranes, but the distribution and signaling of DAG and sphingolipids in specific cellular organelles which regulate insulin sensitivity is not known. There is a critical need to address these gaps in knowledge to design appropriate interventions to prevent and treat lipid-induced insulin resistance. The overall objective of this project is to determine the impact of changes in subcellular DAG and sphingolipid species, signaling, and metabolic function before and after insulin sensitizing lifestyle interventions. The investigators central hypothesis is that DAG and sphingolipids in muscle promote insulin resistance via mechanisms that are unique to location, type of lipid, and species. The rationale for the proposed research is that elucidating changes in localized DAG and sphingolipid species that predict insulin sensitivity will reveal specific localized lipids to target in therapeutics for type 2 diabetes. To attain the overall objective, the investigators propose three specific aims: 1. Identify the influence of sarcolemmal DAG and sphingolipids on cell signaling and insulin sensitivity before and after insulin sensitizing lifestyle interventions. Strong preliminary data shape the hypothesis that sarcolemmal 1,2-disaturated DAG and C18:0 ceramide species will decrease after insulin sensitizing lifestyle interventions, leading to less Protein kinase C (PKC) and Protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) activation, and enhanced insulin signaling. Skeletal muscle DAG and sphingolipid isomers, species, localization, and de novo synthesis will be measured before and after diet-induced weight loss or exercise training interventions in obese men and women. Insulin sensitivity will be measured using insulin clamps, and muscle lipids using Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (LC/MS). 2. Determine the impact of mitochondrial/ER (endoplasmic reticulum) DAG and sphingolipids on mitochondrial function and ER stress in vivo, before and after insulin sensitizing lifestyle interventions. The investigators hypothesize, again based on preliminary data, that mitochondrial/ER sphingolipids will decrease, yet DAG will increase after insulin sensitizing lifestyle interventions, and each will associate with increased insulin sensitivity. Changes in sphingolipids will relate to increased mitochondrial function, less ER stress, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and acyl-carnitine formation, while changes in DAG will relate to increased mitochondrial content and dynamics. 3. Identify the effect of exogenous DAG and sphingolipids on mitochondrial function in vitro, before and after insulin sensitizing lifestyle interventions. The working hypothesis is that DAG and sphingolipids will reduce mitochondrial respiration and increase ROS and acyl-carnitine content, but will be attenuated after endurance exercise training. The proposed research is innovative because it represents a substantive departure from the status quo by addressing cellular compartmentalization of bioactive lipids. The investigators contribution will be significant by identifying key species and locations of DAG and sphingolipids promoting insulin resistance, as well as mechanisms explaining accumulation that could be modified by insulin sensitizing therapeutic interventions.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALLifestyle

Lifestyle changes to lose weight or become more fit

Sponsors

University of Colorado, Denver
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* BMI: 30-40 kg/m2 * Planned physical activity: \<2 hrs/week * Glucose tolerance: 1. Normal glucose tolerance (NGT) defined as: 1. HbA1c of \<5.7%, 2. pre-diabetes as HbA1c of 5.7-6.4%, and 3. type 2 diabetes as HbA1c of ≥6.5% 2. pre-diabetes, and 3. Type 2 diabetes * Oral contraceptive use: Yes or No as long as there is no change during the study * Thyroid status: TSH between 0.5-5.0 mU/L

Exclusion criteria

* Currently taking 1. Thiazolidinediones 2. Insulin * Pregnant * Smoker (tobacco and any form of marijuana use) * Fasting triglycerides \>400mg/dl

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change in Insulin Sensitivity Compared to Baseline Measurement.Baseline and 12 weeksHyperinsulinemic/euglycemic clamp measured as glucose infusion rate in mg/kg/min.
Percent Change in Localized Muscle Lipids Compared to BaselineBaseline and 12 weeksWe measured changes in sarcolemmal, mitochondrial, nuclear and cytosolic lipids measured in pmol/ug protein after compared to before the interventions
Percent Change in Body Weight Compared to Baseline MeasurementBaseline, 3 MonthsThis is the percent change in body weight for each group after the 12 week intervention.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORBryan Bergman

University of Colorado, Denver

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

14 participants dropped out of the study prior to randomization.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Weight Loss Only
Lifestyle: Lifestyle changes to lose weight or become more fit
17
Exercise Only
Lifestyle: Lifestyle changes to lose weight or become more fit
16
Delayed Intervention Control
Control group, no intervention. Participants were offered all benefits of the interventions after study completion.
12
Total45

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicWeight Loss OnlyTotalDelayed Intervention ControlExercise Only
Age, Continuous39.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4
39.65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
39.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7
39.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.1
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants5 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
16 Participants40 Participants10 Participants14 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants3 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants5 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
15 Participants37 Participants9 Participants13 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
17 participants45 participants12 participants16 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants23 Participants6 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants22 Participants6 Participants8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 170 / 160 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 170 / 160 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 170 / 160 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change in Body Weight Compared to Baseline Measurement

This is the percent change in body weight for each group after the 12 week intervention.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Weight Loss OnlyPercent Change in Body Weight Compared to Baseline Measurement-10.5 PercentStandard Error 0.9
Exercise OnlyPercent Change in Body Weight Compared to Baseline Measurement-0.5 PercentStandard Error 0.5
Delayed Intervention ControlPercent Change in Body Weight Compared to Baseline Measurement0.5 PercentStandard Error 0.4
Primary

Percent Change in Insulin Sensitivity Compared to Baseline Measurement.

Hyperinsulinemic/euglycemic clamp measured as glucose infusion rate in mg/kg/min.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Weight Loss OnlyPercent Change in Insulin Sensitivity Compared to Baseline Measurement.31.8 Percent changeStandard Error 8.8
Exercise OnlyPercent Change in Insulin Sensitivity Compared to Baseline Measurement.17.4 Percent changeStandard Error 8.7
Delayed Intervention ControlPercent Change in Insulin Sensitivity Compared to Baseline Measurement.-4.8 Percent changeStandard Error 9.3
Primary

Percent Change in Localized Muscle Lipids Compared to Baseline

We measured changes in sarcolemmal, mitochondrial, nuclear and cytosolic lipids measured in pmol/ug protein after compared to before the interventions

Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Weight Loss OnlyPercent Change in Localized Muscle Lipids Compared to BaselineNuclear triglyceride-20 percentage changeStandard Error 5
Weight Loss OnlyPercent Change in Localized Muscle Lipids Compared to BaselineMitochondrial triglyceride-25 percentage changeStandard Error 6
Weight Loss OnlyPercent Change in Localized Muscle Lipids Compared to BaselineNuclear 1,2-Diacylglycerol20 percentage changeStandard Error 4
Exercise OnlyPercent Change in Localized Muscle Lipids Compared to BaselineNuclear triglyceride-25 percentage changeStandard Error 5
Exercise OnlyPercent Change in Localized Muscle Lipids Compared to BaselineMitochondrial triglyceride-30 percentage changeStandard Error 7
Exercise OnlyPercent Change in Localized Muscle Lipids Compared to BaselineNuclear 1,2-Diacylglycerol25 percentage changeStandard Error 5
Delayed Intervention ControlPercent Change in Localized Muscle Lipids Compared to BaselineMitochondrial triglyceride5 percentage changeStandard Error 6
Delayed Intervention ControlPercent Change in Localized Muscle Lipids Compared to BaselineNuclear 1,2-Diacylglycerol-5 percentage changeStandard Error 1
Delayed Intervention ControlPercent Change in Localized Muscle Lipids Compared to BaselineNuclear triglyceride10 percentage changeStandard Error 3

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 20, 2026