Skip to content

Transverse Coloplasty vs. Side-to-end Anastomosis Following Low Anterior Resection (LAR): CSAR Trial

Transverse Coloplasty vs. Side-to-end Anastomosis Following Low Anterior Resection (LAR): CSAR Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03074461
Acronym
CSAR
Enrollment
80
Registered
2017-03-08
Start date
2017-04-05
Completion date
2020-03-31
Last updated
2017-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fecal Incontinence, Rectal Cancer, Rectal Neoplasms, Rectal Tumors

Keywords

Rectal Cancer, Low Anterior Resection, Coloplasty Pouch, Side-to-end Anastomosis, Continence, Quality of Life

Brief summary

CSAR Trial's aim is to determine whether the transverse coloplasty pouch or the side-to-end anastomosis as rectal reservoir reconstruction offers the best functional results.

Detailed description

This study directly compares two neorectal reservoir-techniques, the transverse coloplasty and the side-to-end anastomosis, in low anterior resection in distal rectal cancer for the first time. Its focus is on the functional results. Besides stool frequency, the quality of life, safety of the procedures and the usage of stool modulating drugs is monitored in an 12 months-follow up regime.

Interventions

During the scheduled low anterior resection (LAR) in patients with distal rectal cancer and anticipated anastomosis in the mid or distal rectal third, the reconstruction phase of the LAR consists of the implementation of a side-to-end colorectal anastomosis.

PROCEDURETransverse Coloplasty

During the scheduled low anterior resection (LAR) in patients with distal rectal cancer and anticipated anastomosis in the mid or distal rectal third, the reconstruction phase of the LAR consists of the implementation of a transverse coloplasty pouch. For this purpose an end-to-end colorectal anastomosis is initially performed, followed by a longitudinal incision of approx. 8-10 cm length proximal of the anastomosis and a subsequent transverse suture in terms of the coloplasty technique.

Sponsors

Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

There is no masking in the CSAR Trial

Intervention model description

Study participants will be randomized in two parallel study arms regarding their neorectal reconstruction in low anterior resection, the experimental arm using the side-to-end anastomosis and the control group using the transverse coloplasty technique.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Scheduled low anterior resection in patients with distal rectal carcinoma and planned anastomosis in mid/distal third of rectum * Local curative approach * Normal continence preoperatively * Non-IBD-associated carcinoma * Possible sphincter salvage * Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Non-curative approaches * Emergency surgery in cases of tumor perforation, abscess, sepsis * Proximal rectal carcinoma (\> 12 cm from anocutaneous line) * Lack of informed consent * Age \<18 years * Inclusion in other trials with interference of endpoints * Life expectancy less than 24 months (as estimated by the treating physicians) * Pregnancy * Immunosuppression

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stool frequencytime = 6 months postoperativeBetween group differences in stool frequency at t = 6 months postoperative

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative complicationsthrough study completion (an average of 12 months postoperative)* Septic intraabdominal complications related to anastomosis (anastomotic insufficiencies, suture insufficiencies, abscesses); * Wound infection
Quality of Lifebaseline, postoperative (2-3 months, 6 months, 12 months)Quality of Life with focus on colorectally specialized questionnaires
Antimotility drug usagebaseline, postoperative (2-3 months, 6 months, 12 months)Usage of antimotility drugs (e.g. loperamide) evaluated by standardized questionnaires

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Primary ContactMarkus Rentsch, MD
markus.rentsch@med.uni-muenchen.de0049/89/4400/711213
Backup ContactSandro M Hasenhütl, MD
sandro.hasenhuetl@med.uni-muenchen.de0049/89/4400/711242

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026