Skip to content

Isocapnic Hyperventilation - an Alternative Method

Isocapnic Hyperventilation for Enhancing Recovery After Inhalation Anaesthesia - an Alternative Method

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03074110
Enrollment
31
Registered
2017-03-08
Start date
2016-11-11
Completion date
2017-08-15
Last updated
2018-01-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Oropharyngeal Neoplasms

Keywords

Inhalation Anaesthetics, Sevoflurane, Carbon Dioxide, Hyperventilation, Anaesthesia Recovery Period, Ventilators

Brief summary

Isocapnic hyperventilation (IHV) is a method that shortens time to extubation after inhalation anaesthesia by increasing airway carbon dioxide (CO2) during hyperventilation (HV). In two experimental studies (mechanical lung model and porcine model) and in a pilot study on patients undergoing sevoflurane anaesthesia for major ear-nose-throat (ENT) surgery, the investigators evaluated the feasibility of an alternative technique of IHV. By performing a prospective, randomised controlled study, the investigators want to further test this alternative method for IHV.

Detailed description

Isocapnic hyperventilation (IHV) provides an alternative method for weaning from inhalation anaesthesia which decreases the time to eye-opening, extubation and time spent in the PACU. The method is well known since at least 40-50 years and involves the maintenance of a stable CO2 level during hyperventilation, which increases the elimination of anaesthetic gas without producing hypocapnia. Studies have declared that the reduction in time to eye-opening is 50-60 % compared to a standard weaning procedure after inhalation anaesthesia. There are several principally different ways to maintain the CO2 level during hyperventilation, where a number of technical solutions that add dead-space to the anaesthesia circuit and thereby produce rebreathing of CO2 during hyperventilation are the most studied methods so far. However, the original method of directly adding CO2 to the breathing circuit during hyperventilation could be considered in need of a re-evaluation, as modern anaesthesia delivery units and monitoring equipment to a great extent can eliminate the risk of hypercapnia, that was described with this procedure in the 1980ies. An alternative IHV method is to directly infuse CO2 to the inspiratory limb of the breathing circuit through a mixing box while using mechanical hyperventilation by a standardised protocol. This technique was recently evaluated by the investigators, in a bench test, and in an in vivo model. Based on these studies, the CO2 dosage needed to achieve isocapnia during HV at various levels of alveolar ventilation, CO2 production and dead space was estimated and a gender- and weight-based nomogram for CO2 delivery during IHV was constructed. Furthermore, the investigators could show, in vivo, that the washout time of sevoflurane anaesthesia was one-third compared to normal ventilation. The feasibility of this IHV method was evaluated in a pilot study in humans, based on the results of our two previous experimental studies. To finalize the project the investigators now conduct a prospective randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy of the method, compared to a standard weaning procedure, after long-term sevoflurane anaesthesia.

Interventions

Mechanical hyperventilation to enhance elimination of inahalation anesthetics. Administration of a precalculated flow of CO2 according to gender and weight into the inspiratory limb of the breathing circuit in order to avoid hypocapnia.

Sponsors

Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients scheduled for major elective ear-nose-throat (ENT) surgery after informed consent was obtained during the pre-operative evaluation.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with severe pulmonary or circulatory disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Time to extubation5-20 minutes
Time to eye-opening10-25 minutes
Time to discharge from OR15-40 minutes

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative recovery60 minutesPostoperative quality of recovery (PQRS) scale
Time to eligible for discharge from post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU)1-6 hours

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026