Skip to content

A Retrospective Study of the Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical System

A Retrospective Study of the Navio™ Robotic-assisted Surgical System

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03072459
Acronym
NAVIO
Enrollment
128
Registered
2017-03-07
Start date
2017-07-10
Completion date
2017-11-29
Last updated
2022-05-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Replacement, Surgical Robotics

Brief summary

A retrospective, multi-center, cohort study with prospective follow-up and comparison to historical control

Detailed description

Subjects who had previously received the Navio robotic-assisted surgical system for unilateral knee replacement (UKR) were assessed to determine the 2-year safety and effectiveness of the Navio system.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female subjects ≥ 18 years old (at the time of surgery) who have undergone Navio System-assisted UKR at least 2 years prior to enrollment. This includes UKR procedures with all Unicondylar Knee cemented implant designs. 2. Subject had a primary diagnosis of unicompartmental, non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, or avascular necrosis, required correction of functional deformity, or required treatment of fractures that were unmanageable using other techniques.

Exclusion criteria

1. Subject received the Navio System-assisted UKR on the index joint as a revision for a previously failed UKR. 2. Subject, in the opinion of the Investigator, had advanced osteoarthritis or joint disease at the time of surgery and was better suited for Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). 3. Subject, in the opinion of the Investigator, had a neuromuscular disorder that prohibited control of the index joint. 4. Subject, in the opinion of the Investigator, was morbidly obese. 5. Subject, in the opinion of the Investigator, was contraindicated for UKR. 6. Subject (prospective subjects only), in the opinion of the Investigator, has an emotional or neurological condition including mental illness, mental retardation, drug or alcohol abuse. 7. Subject (prospective subjects only) is a prisoner.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluate the Navio™ System for Revisions at 2+ Years Post-surgical Implantation SurvivorshipPreoperative (Baseline) and 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 weeks postoperativelyAnalysis of the absence of device revision (overall survivorship) outcomes assessed from Baseline through 120 weeks post-surgical implantation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) AssessmentsPreoperative (Baseline) and 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months postoperativelyAnalysis of VR-12 scores preoperatively (Baseline) through 36 months postoperatively in 6 months increments. These scores encompass the individual domains of physical component score (PCS), mental component score (MCS) as well as the sub-domain scores within the PCS (physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, and general health) and those within the MCS (vitality, social functioning, role emotional, and mental health). Domain Scores: Physical Component Score (PCS): Range 1 to 20 Mental Component Score (MCS): Range 1 to 25 Sub-domain Scores: Physical Functioning: Range 1 to 6 Role Physical: Range 1 to 4 Bodily Pain: Range 1 to 6 General Health: Range 1 to 6 Vitality: Range 1 to 6 Social Functioning: Range 1 to 6 Role Emotional: Range 1 to 4 Mental Health: Range 1 to 10 Transformation of raw scale scores (range 0-100) = {(actual raw score - lowest possible raw score)/possible raw score range} x100 A higher score indicates a better outcome.
Preoperative Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPreoperative (Baseline)Changes in radiographic findings (anterior-posterior \[AP\] and lateral x-rays) from Baseline to 3 years postoperatively were collected for the SAF population.
Postoperative 6-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic Findings6 months postoperativelyChanges in radiographic findings (AP and lateral x-rays) from Baseline to 3 years postoperatively were collected for the SAF population.
Postoperative 12-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic Findings12 months postoperativelyChanges in radiographic findings (AP and lateral x-rays) from Baseline to 3 years postoperatively were collected for the SAF population.
Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Knee Society Score (KSS) AssessmentsPreoperative (Baseline) and 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months postoperativelyAnalysis of KSS from preoperatively (Baseline) up to 36 months postoperatively in 6-months increments to evaluate objective observation, patient satisfaction, and function. Objective knee indicators: Range 0-100 points; Patient Satisfaction: Range 0-40 points; and Functional Activities: Range 0-100 points. Higher scores indicated a better outcome.
Postoperative 24-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic Findings24 months postoperativelyChanges in radiographic findings (AP and lateral x-rays) from Baseline to 3 years postoperatively were collected for the SAF population.
Postoperative 30-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic Findings30 months postoperativelyChanges in radiographic findings (AP and lateral x-rays) from Baseline to 3 years postoperatively were collected for the SAF population.
Postoperative 36-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic Findings36 months postoperativelyChanges in radiographic findings (AP and lateral x-rays) from Baseline to 3 years postoperatively were collected for the SAF population.
Postoperative 18-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic Findings18 months postoperativelyChanges in radiographic findings (AP and lateral x-rays) from Baseline to 3 years postoperatively were collected for the SAF population.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical System
Subjects who had previously received the Navio™ robotic-assisted surgical system for UKR were assessed to determine the 2-year safety and effectiveness of the Navio™ system.
128
Total128

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDevice revised/removed1
Overall StudySubject not able to return1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNavio Robotic-assisted Surgical System
Age, Continuous64.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
Age, Customized
< 60 years
39 Participants
Age, Customized
≥ 60 years
89 Participants
Blood Loss Prevention Method
Aquamantus
0 Participants
Blood Loss Prevention Method
Other
0 Participants
Blood Loss Prevention Method
Tourniquet
83 Participants
Blood Loss Prevention Method
Unknown
45 Participants
BMI30.3 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4
BMI Category
< 30 kg/m^2
66 Participants
BMI Category
≥ 30 kg/m^2
61 Participants
Duration of Surgery1.8 hours
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
128 Participants
Height172.1 centimeters (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8
Intra-operative Complications
No
128 Participants
Intra-operative Complications
Yes
0 Participants
Knee System Type
Missing
3 Participants
Knee System Type
Other - Non-Smith & Nephew
17 Participants
Knee System Type
Smith & Nephew
108 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
122 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
128 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
54 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
74 Participants
Smoking Status
Current smoker
7 Participants
Smoking Status
Never smoked
74 Participants
Smoking Status
Previous smoker
31 Participants
Smoking Status
Unknown
16 Participants
Surgical Approach
Lateral parapatellar
3 Participants
Surgical Approach
Medial parapatellar
89 Participants
Surgical Approach
Midvastus
0 Participants
Surgical Approach
Other
18 Participants
Surgical Approach
Subvastus / Tissue sparing
18 Participants
Surgical Approach
Unknown
0 Participants
Unilateral Knee Replacement Type Used
Lateral
4 Participants
Unilateral Knee Replacement Type Used
Medial
124 Participants
Weight89.9 kilograms (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.1

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 128
other
Total, other adverse events
28 / 128
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 128

Outcome results

Primary

Evaluate the Navio™ System for Revisions at 2+ Years Post-surgical Implantation Survivorship

Analysis of the absence of device revision (overall survivorship) outcomes assessed from Baseline through 120 weeks post-surgical implantation.

Time frame: Preoperative (Baseline) and 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 weeks postoperatively

Population: Safety (SAF) population. The SAF population included all subjects who received the study device and were present for follow-up visits at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluate the Navio™ System for Revisions at 2+ Years Post-surgical Implantation SurvivorshipNumber of Knees with Revisions : Week 00 participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluate the Navio™ System for Revisions at 2+ Years Post-surgical Implantation SurvivorshipNumber of Knees with Revisions : Week 240 participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluate the Navio™ System for Revisions at 2+ Years Post-surgical Implantation SurvivorshipNumber of Knees with Revisions : Week 481 participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluate the Navio™ System for Revisions at 2+ Years Post-surgical Implantation SurvivorshipNumber of Knees with Revisions : Week 720 participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluate the Navio™ System for Revisions at 2+ Years Post-surgical Implantation SurvivorshipNumber of Knees with Revisions : Week 960 participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluate the Navio™ System for Revisions at 2+ Years Post-surgical Implantation SurvivorshipNumber of Knees with Revisions : Week 1200 participants
Secondary

Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Knee Society Score (KSS) Assessments

Analysis of KSS from preoperatively (Baseline) up to 36 months postoperatively in 6-months increments to evaluate objective observation, patient satisfaction, and function. Objective knee indicators: Range 0-100 points; Patient Satisfaction: Range 0-40 points; and Functional Activities: Range 0-100 points. Higher scores indicated a better outcome.

Time frame: Preoperative (Baseline) and 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months postoperatively

Population: The KSS questionnaire assessments were self-reported and not all enrolled subjects completed the questionnaires. See detailed number of participants who completed each response question.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluation of Efficacy Based on Knee Society Score (KSS) AssessmentsFunctional Activities: Preoperative42.8 score on a scale
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluation of Efficacy Based on Knee Society Score (KSS) AssessmentsObjective Knee Indicators: Preoperative48.6 score on a scale
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluation of Efficacy Based on Knee Society Score (KSS) AssessmentsObjective Knee Indicators: 6 Months Postoperative51.6 score on a scale
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluation of Efficacy Based on Knee Society Score (KSS) AssessmentsObjective Knee Indicators: 12 Months Postoperative49.3 score on a scale
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluation of Efficacy Based on Knee Society Score (KSS) AssessmentsObjective Knee Indicators: 18 Months Postoperative49.9 score on a scale
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluation of Efficacy Based on Knee Society Score (KSS) AssessmentsObjective Knee Indicators: 24 Months Postoperative61.9 score on a scale
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluation of Efficacy Based on Knee Society Score (KSS) AssessmentsObjective Knee Indicators: 30 Months Postoperative63.8 score on a scale
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluation of Efficacy Based on Knee Society Score (KSS) AssessmentsObjective Knee Indicators: 36 Months Postoperative60 score on a scale
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluation of Efficacy Based on Knee Society Score (KSS) AssessmentsPatient Satisfaction: Preoperative14.0 score on a scale
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluation of Efficacy Based on Knee Society Score (KSS) AssessmentsPatient Satisfaction: 6 Months Postoperative30.0 score on a scale
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluation of Efficacy Based on Knee Society Score (KSS) AssessmentsPatient Satisfaction: 12 Months Postoperative32 score on a scale
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluation of Efficacy Based on Knee Society Score (KSS) AssessmentsPatient Satisfaction: 18 Months Postoperative32.8 score on a scale
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluation of Efficacy Based on Knee Society Score (KSS) AssessmentsPatient Satisfaction: 24 Months Postoperative34.0 score on a scale
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluation of Efficacy Based on Knee Society Score (KSS) AssessmentsPatient Satisfaction: 30 Months Postoperative33.4 score on a scale
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluation of Efficacy Based on Knee Society Score (KSS) AssessmentsPatient Satisfaction: 36 Months Postoperative34.8 score on a scale
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluation of Efficacy Based on Knee Society Score (KSS) AssessmentsFunctional Activities: 6 Months Postoperative73.3 score on a scale
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluation of Efficacy Based on Knee Society Score (KSS) AssessmentsFunctional Activities: 12 Months Postoperative78.2 score on a scale
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluation of Efficacy Based on Knee Society Score (KSS) AssessmentsFunctional Activities: 18 Months Postoperative73.9 score on a scale
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluation of Efficacy Based on Knee Society Score (KSS) AssessmentsFunctional Activities: 24 Months Postoperative81.9 score on a scale
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluation of Efficacy Based on Knee Society Score (KSS) AssessmentsFunctional Activities: 30 Months Postoperative81.1 score on a scale
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluation of Efficacy Based on Knee Society Score (KSS) AssessmentsFunctional Activities: 36 Months Postoperative82.6 score on a scale
Secondary

Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) Assessments

Analysis of VR-12 scores preoperatively (Baseline) through 36 months postoperatively in 6 months increments. These scores encompass the individual domains of physical component score (PCS), mental component score (MCS) as well as the sub-domain scores within the PCS (physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, and general health) and those within the MCS (vitality, social functioning, role emotional, and mental health). Domain Scores: Physical Component Score (PCS): Range 1 to 20 Mental Component Score (MCS): Range 1 to 25 Sub-domain Scores: Physical Functioning: Range 1 to 6 Role Physical: Range 1 to 4 Bodily Pain: Range 1 to 6 General Health: Range 1 to 6 Vitality: Range 1 to 6 Social Functioning: Range 1 to 6 Role Emotional: Range 1 to 4 Mental Health: Range 1 to 10 Transformation of raw scale scores (range 0-100) = {(actual raw score - lowest possible raw score)/possible raw score range} x100 A higher score indicates a better outcome.

Time frame: Preoperative (Baseline) and 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months postoperatively

Population: The VR-12 questionnaire assessments were self-reported and not all enrolled subjects completed the questionnaires. See detailed number of participants who completed each response question.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluation of Efficacy Based on Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) AssessmentsPCS: 6 Months Postoperative15.0 score on a scale
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluation of Efficacy Based on Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) AssessmentsPCS: Preoperative11.2 score on a scale
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluation of Efficacy Based on Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) AssessmentsPCS: 12 Months Postoperative15.0 score on a scale
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluation of Efficacy Based on Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) AssessmentsPCS: 18 Months Postoperative14.9 score on a scale
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluation of Efficacy Based on Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) AssessmentsPCS: 24 Months Postoperative14.6 score on a scale
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluation of Efficacy Based on Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) AssessmentsPCS: 30 Months Postoperative15.0 score on a scale
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluation of Efficacy Based on Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) AssessmentsPCS: 36 Months Postoperative15.4 score on a scale
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluation of Efficacy Based on Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) AssessmentsMCS: Preoperative17.3 score on a scale
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluation of Efficacy Based on Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) AssessmentsMCS: 6 Months Postoperative19.7 score on a scale
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluation of Efficacy Based on Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) AssessmentsMCS: 12 Months Postoperative20.0 score on a scale
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluation of Efficacy Based on Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) AssessmentsMCS: 18 Months Postoperative20.1 score on a scale
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluation of Efficacy Based on Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) AssessmentsMCS: 24 Months Postoperative20.4 score on a scale
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluation of Efficacy Based on Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) AssessmentsMCS: 30 Months Postoperative21.1 score on a scale
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemEvaluation of Efficacy Based on Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) AssessmentsMCS: 36 Months Postoperative18.6 score on a scale
Secondary

Postoperative 12-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic Findings

Changes in radiographic findings (AP and lateral x-rays) from Baseline to 3 years postoperatively were collected for the SAF population.

Time frame: 12 months postoperatively

Population: The data presented for this outcome are based upon the number of participants who returned for evaluation at this specific time point.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 12-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial OsteolysisYes1 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 12-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial OsteolysisNo24 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 12-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial OsteolysisUnknown3 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 12-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial OsteolysisMissing30 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 12-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral OsteolysisYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 12-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral OsteolysisNo25 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 12-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral OsteolysisUnknown3 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 12-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral OsteolysisMissing30 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 12-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial Migration/SubsidenceYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 12-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial Migration/SubsidenceNo25 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 12-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial Migration/SubsidenceUnknown3 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 12-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial Migration/SubsidenceMissing30 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 12-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral Migration/SubsidenceYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 12-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral Migration/SubsidenceNo25 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 12-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral Migration/SubsidenceUnknown3 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 12-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral Migration/SubsidenceMissing30 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 12-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsHeterotropic OssificationYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 12-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsHeterotropic OssificationNo25 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 12-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsHeterotropic OssificationUnknown3 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 12-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsHeterotropic OssificationMissing30 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 12-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar SubluxationYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 12-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar SubluxationNo25 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 12-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar SubluxationUnknown3 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 12-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar SubluxationMissing30 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 12-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar DislocationYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 12-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar DislocationNo25 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 12-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar DislocationUnknown3 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 12-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar DislocationMissing30 Participants
Secondary

Postoperative 18-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic Findings

Changes in radiographic findings (AP and lateral x-rays) from Baseline to 3 years postoperatively were collected for the SAF population.

Time frame: 18 months postoperatively

Population: The data presented for this outcome are based upon the number of participants who returned for evaluation at this specific time point.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 18-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial OsteolysisYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 18-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial OsteolysisNo27 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 18-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial OsteolysisUnknown0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 18-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial OsteolysisMissing14 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 18-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral OsteolysisYes1 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 18-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral OsteolysisNo26 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 18-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral OsteolysisUnknown0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 18-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral OsteolysisMissing14 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 18-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial Migration/SubsidenceYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 18-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial Migration/SubsidenceNo27 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 18-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial Migration/SubsidenceUnknown0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 18-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial Migration/SubsidenceMissing14 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 18-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral Migration/SubsidenceYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 18-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral Migration/SubsidenceNo27 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 18-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral Migration/SubsidenceUnknown0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 18-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral Migration/SubsidenceMissing14 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 18-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsHeterotropic OssificationYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 18-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsHeterotropic OssificationNo27 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 18-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsHeterotropic OssificationUnknown0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 18-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsHeterotropic OssificationMissing14 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 18-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar SubluxationYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 18-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar SubluxationNo27 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 18-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar SubluxationUnknown0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 18-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar SubluxationMissing14 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 18-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar DislocationYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 18-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar DislocationNo27 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 18-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar DislocationUnknown0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 18-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar DislocationMissing14 Participants
Secondary

Postoperative 24-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic Findings

Changes in radiographic findings (AP and lateral x-rays) from Baseline to 3 years postoperatively were collected for the SAF population.

Time frame: 24 months postoperatively

Population: The data presented for this outcome are based upon the number of participants who returned for evaluation at this specific time point.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 24-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial OsteolysisYes1 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 24-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial OsteolysisNo22 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 24-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial OsteolysisUnknown5 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 24-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial OsteolysisMissing33 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 24-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral OsteolysisYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 24-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral OsteolysisNo24 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 24-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral OsteolysisUnknown4 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 24-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral OsteolysisMissing33 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 24-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial Migration/SubsidenceYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 24-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial Migration/SubsidenceNo26 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 24-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial Migration/SubsidenceUnknown2 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 24-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial Migration/SubsidenceMissing33 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 24-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral Migration/SubsidenceYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 24-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral Migration/SubsidenceNo26 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 24-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral Migration/SubsidenceUnknown2 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 24-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral Migration/SubsidenceMissing33 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 24-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsHeterotropic OssificationYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 24-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsHeterotropic OssificationNo26 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 24-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsHeterotropic OssificationUnknown2 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 24-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsHeterotropic OssificationMissing33 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 24-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar SubluxationYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 24-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar SubluxationNo26 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 24-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar SubluxationUnknown2 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 24-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar SubluxationMissing33 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 24-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar DislocationYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 24-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar DislocationNo26 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 24-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar DislocationUnknown2 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 24-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar DislocationMissing33 Participants
Secondary

Postoperative 30-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic Findings

Changes in radiographic findings (AP and lateral x-rays) from Baseline to 3 years postoperatively were collected for the SAF population.

Time frame: 30 months postoperatively

Population: The data presented for this outcome are based upon the number of participants who returned for evaluation at this specific time point.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 30-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial OsteolysisYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 30-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial OsteolysisNo29 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 30-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial OsteolysisUnknown1 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 30-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial OsteolysisMissing26 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 30-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral OsteolysisYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 30-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral OsteolysisNo29 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 30-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral OsteolysisUnknown1 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 30-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral Migration/SubsidenceUnknown0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 30-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral OsteolysisMissing26 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 30-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial Migration/SubsidenceYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 30-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial Migration/SubsidenceNo30 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 30-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial Migration/SubsidenceUnknown0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 30-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial Migration/SubsidenceMissing26 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 30-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral Migration/SubsidenceYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 30-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral Migration/SubsidenceNo30 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 30-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral Migration/SubsidenceMissing26 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 30-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsHeterotropic OssificationYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 30-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsHeterotropic OssificationNo30 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 30-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsHeterotropic OssificationUnknown0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 30-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsHeterotropic OssificationMissing26 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 30-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar SubluxationYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 30-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar SubluxationNo30 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 30-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar SubluxationUnknown0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 30-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar SubluxationMissing26 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 30-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar DislocationYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 30-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar DislocationNo30 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 30-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar DislocationUnknown0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 30-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar DislocationMissing26 Participants
Secondary

Postoperative 36-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic Findings

Changes in radiographic findings (AP and lateral x-rays) from Baseline to 3 years postoperatively were collected for the SAF population.

Time frame: 36 months postoperatively

Population: The data presented for this outcome are based upon the number of participants who returned for evaluation at this specific time point.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 36-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar SubluxationYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 36-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial OsteolysisYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 36-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial OsteolysisNo13 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 36-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial OsteolysisUnknown0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 36-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial OsteolysisMissing10 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 36-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral OsteolysisYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 36-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral OsteolysisNo13 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 36-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral OsteolysisUnknown0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 36-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral OsteolysisMissing10 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 36-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial Migration/SubsidenceYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 36-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial Migration/SubsidenceNo13 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 36-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial Migration/SubsidenceUnknown0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 36-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial Migration/SubsidenceMissing10 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 36-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral Migration/SubsidenceYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 36-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral Migration/SubsidenceNo13 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 36-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral Migration/SubsidenceUnknown0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 36-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral Migration/SubsidenceMissing10 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 36-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsHeterotropic OssificationYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 36-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsHeterotropic OssificationNo13 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 36-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsHeterotropic OssificationUnknown0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 36-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsHeterotropic OssificationMissing10 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 36-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar SubluxationNo13 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 36-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar SubluxationUnknown0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 36-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar SubluxationMissing10 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 36-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar DislocationYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 36-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar DislocationNo13 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 36-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar DislocationUnknown0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 36-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar DislocationMissing10 Participants
Secondary

Postoperative 6-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic Findings

Changes in radiographic findings (AP and lateral x-rays) from Baseline to 3 years postoperatively were collected for the SAF population.

Time frame: 6 months postoperatively

Population: The data presented for this outcome are based upon the number of participants who returned for evaluation at this specific time point.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 6-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial OsteolysisYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 6-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial OsteolysisNo25 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 6-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial OsteolysisUnknown3 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 6-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial OsteolysisMissing99 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 6-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral OsteolysisYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 6-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral OsteolysisNo25 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 6-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral OsteolysisUnknown3 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 6-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral OsteolysisMissing99 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 6-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial Migration/SubsidenceYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 6-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial Migration/SubsidenceNo25 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 6-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial Migration/SubsidenceUnknown3 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 6-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial Migration/SubsidenceMissing99 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 6-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral Migration/SubsidenceYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 6-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral Migration/SubsidenceNo25 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 6-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral Migration/SubsidenceUnknown3 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 6-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral Migration/SubsidenceMissing99 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 6-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsHeterotropic OssificationYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 6-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsHeterotropic OssificationNo25 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 6-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsHeterotropic OssificationUnknown3 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 6-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsHeterotropic OssificationMissing99 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 6-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar SubluxationYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 6-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar SubluxationNo25 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 6-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar SubluxationUnknown3 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 6-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar SubluxationMissing99 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 6-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar DislocationYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 6-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar DislocationNo25 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 6-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar DislocationUnknown3 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPostoperative 6-Month Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar DislocationMissing99 Participants
Secondary

Preoperative Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic Findings

Changes in radiographic findings (anterior-posterior \[AP\] and lateral x-rays) from Baseline to 3 years postoperatively were collected for the SAF population.

Time frame: Preoperative (Baseline)

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPreoperative Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial OsteolysisYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPreoperative Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial OsteolysisNo0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPreoperative Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial OsteolysisUnknown0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPreoperative Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial OsteolysisMissing128 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPreoperative Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral osteolysisYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPreoperative Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral osteolysisNo0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPreoperative Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral osteolysisUnknown0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPreoperative Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral osteolysisMissing128 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPreoperative Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial Migration/SubsidenceYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPreoperative Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial Migration/SubsidenceNo0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPreoperative Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial Migration/SubsidenceUnknown0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPreoperative Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsTibial Migration/SubsidenceMissing128 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPreoperative Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral Migration/SubsidenceYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPreoperative Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral Migration/SubsidenceNo0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPreoperative Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral Migration/SubsidenceUnknown0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPreoperative Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsFemoral Migration/SubsidenceMissing128 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPreoperative Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsHeterotropic OssificationYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPreoperative Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsHeterotropic OssificationNo0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPreoperative Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsHeterotropic OssificationUnknown0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPreoperative Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsHeterotropic OssificationMissing128 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPreoperative Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar SubluxationYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPreoperative Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar SubluxationNo0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPreoperative Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar SubluxationUnknown0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPreoperative Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar SubluxationMissing128 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPreoperative Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar DislocationYes0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPreoperative Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar DislocationNo0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPreoperative Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar DislocationUnknown0 Participants
Navio Robotic-assisted Surgical SystemPreoperative Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Radiographic FindingsPatellar DislocationMissing128 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026