Skip to content

Intra-operative Feed Back on Traction Force During Vacuum Extraction: Safe Vacuum Extraction Alliance

Intra-operative Feed Back on Traction Force During Vacuum Extraction: a Randomized Control Study of Mid and Low Metal Cup Deliveries.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03071783
Acronym
SVEA
Enrollment
800
Registered
2017-03-07
Start date
2016-04-01
Completion date
2018-06-15
Last updated
2019-03-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy, Neonatal Convulsions, Subgaleal Hematoma

Brief summary

The objective of the clinical investigation is to test whether intra-operative traction force feed back during vacuum extraction leads to a significant decrease in incidence of brain damage in neonates. By randomization, half of the vacuum extraction patients will be assigned to delivery using a new intelligent handle for vacuum extractions, and half will be assigned to conventional method without traction force measurement.

Detailed description

The most common indications for vacuum extraction are dystocia and/or fetal asphyxia. The safety of assisted vaginal delivery with vacuum extraction has been discussed since its introduction almost fifty years ago. Serious complications such as asphyxia, intracranial hemorrhage and seizures are overrepresented at vacuum extraction compared to spontaneous vaginal delivery. Little has been done to improve the procedure since the introduction. Safety measures recommended include restricting total time and number of pulls, a full 34 week gestation, and station of the head at the spines or below. A general advice is also to avoid excessive traction force. There is no general agreement to what a safe traction force might be. With exceeding force there seems to be an increased risk for rupture of the sagittal sinus and tearing of the falx at its attachment to the tentorium. Furthermore, when the fetal head is becoming exceedingly elongated and flattened, and as the cup pops off it might cause damage to the brain and blood vessels. During the procedure the obstetrician is under significant stress and the subjective element of the evaluation of traction force is a concern. The difficult decision of whether to continue a heavy extraction or abort the operation is made under stressful conditions and based mostly on subjective impressions. To provide the obstetrician with more objective information, the investigators developed a new device consisting of an intelligent handle hooked to the chain of a regular metal cup.

Interventions

DEVICEVacuum extraction intelligent system

Vacuum extraction intelligent system - this is the intervention

Sponsors

Karolinska Institutet
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Medical or social reasons for vacuum extraction with a metal cup, gestational age ≥37+0 weeks, singleton, cephalic

Exclusion criteria

* Multiple pregnancy, breech presentation, gestational age \<37+0

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Composite neonatal brain damageFrom start of extraction through 28 days after delivery (or until discharge from the hospital)Composite consists of: Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), seizures, perinatal mortality and subgaleal hematoma as routinely diagnosed in patient chart

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026