Epidermolysis Bullosa
Conditions
Brief summary
This was a Phase III, Efficacy and Safety Study of Oleogel-S10 in Participants with Inherited Epidermolysis Bullosa (EB). EB is a rare group of genetic skin fragility disorders characterised by blistering of the skin in response to minor injury. In most cases, onset of EB is at birth or shortly after. All participants affected by any type of EB share the main characteristic of repeatedly developing painful wounds that take days to months to heal. Current treatment of EB is primarily preventative and supportive including protection from mechanical forces by avoiding rubbing, early treatment of wounds to prevent infections, and protection of the wound with adequate non-adhesive dressings to enable healing. The active pharmaceutical ingredient in Oleogel-S10 is a refined birch bark extract, quantified to 72 to 88% betulin. This clinical study of Oleogel-S10 in patients with inherited EB has been carried out to investigate whether Oleogel-S10 is effective for treatment of EB wounds and safe for long-term use. Oleogel-S10 was compared to a control gel. The control gel matched Oleogel-S10 in terms of texture and visual appearance to allow for double-blinding. The packaging for Oleogel-S10 gel and the control gel were identical. The participant received either Oleogel-S10 or control gel for a double-blind study phase of 90 days. The probability that the participant received Oleogel-S10 was 50%, which means that they had a 1 in 2 chance of receiving Oleogel-S10. However, in the follow-up phase of the study all participants were treated with Oleogel-S10 for a period of 24 months. This clinical study was performed at 49 study sites in 26 countries (Argentina, Australia, Austria, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong \[China\], Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Singapore, Spain, Switzerland, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and the United States); 223 participants participated in total.
Interventions
DRUGOleogel-S10
10% birch bark extract in 90% sunflower oil
DRUGControl gel
Sunflower oil, Cera flava/yellow wax, and Carnauba wax (matched Oleogel-S10 in terms of texture and visual appearance)
Sponsors
Amryt Research Limited
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Days to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Male and female patients with the following subtypes of inherited EB: junctional EB (JEB), dystrophic EB (DEB), and Kindler EB aged ≥21 days * Patients with an EB target wound (i.e., EB partial thickness wound of 10 cm² to 50 cm² in size aged ≥21 days and \<9 months) * Patient and/or his/her legal representative has/have been informed, has/have read and understood the patient information/informed consent form, and has/have given written informed consent * Patient and/or his/her legal representative must be able and willing to follow study procedures and instructions
Exclusion criteria
* Patient has EB simplex * EB target wound that is ≥9 months old or has clinical signs of local infection * Use of systemic antibiotics for wound-related infections within 7 days prior to enrolment * Administration of systemic or topical steroids (except for inhaled, ophthalmic or topical applications, such as budesonide suspension for oesophageal strictures \[e.g., Pulmicort respules® 0.25 mg/2 mL or 0.5 mg/2 mL\]) within 30 days before enrolment * Immunosuppressive therapy or cytotoxic chemotherapy within 60 days prior to enrolment * Patient has undergone stem cell transplant or gene therapy for the treatment of inherited EB * Current and/or former malignancy including basal cell carcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas * Enrolment in any interventional study or treated with any investigational drug for any disease within 4 weeks prior to study entry * Factors present in the patient and/or his/her legal representative that could interfere with study compliance such as inability to attend scheduled study visits or compliance with home dressing changes * Pregnant or nursing women and women of childbearing potential including postmenarchal female adolescents not willing to use an effective form of birth control with failure rates \<1% per year (e.g., implant, injectable, combined oral contraceptive, intrauterine contraceptive device, sexual abstinence, vasectomised partner) during participation in the study (and at least 3 months thereafter) * Patient is a member of the investigational team or his/her immediate family * Patient lives in the same household as a study participant
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of Patients With First Complete Closure of the EB Target Wound Within 45 Days of Treatment | 45±7 days | Proportion of subjects with first complete closure of the EB target wound (defined as EB partial-thickness wound of 10 cm2 to 50 cm2 in size and ≥21 days to \<9 months in age) in subjects with inherited EB (subtypes DEB, JEB, or Kindler EB) within 45 days of treatment with Oleogel-S10 compared to control gel based on clinical assessment by the investigator (the wound was rated as closed at first appearance of complete re-epithelialization without drainage). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of Patients With First Complete Closure of the EB Target Wound at D90 or EDBP Based on Clinical Assessment by the Investigator Until D90 or EDBP | 90±7 days | The second key secondary endpoint was the proportion of subjects with first complete closure of the EB target wound within 90 days of treatment or by EDBP based on clinical assessment by the investigator. |
| The Incidence of EB Target Wound Infection Between Baseline (DBP D0) and D90 or EDBP as Evidenced by Adverse Events (AEs) and/or Use of Topical and/or Systemic Antibiotics (Related to Wound Infection) | 90±7 days | The incidence of EB target wound infections between Baseline (DBP D0) and D90 or EDBP was assessed based on the total number of patients with an EB target wound infection, as evidenced by AEs and/or the use of topical and/or systemic antibiotics, and the total number of patients |
| The Maximum Severity of EB Target Wound Infection Between Baseline (DBP D0) and D90 or EDBP as Evidenced by AEs | 90±7 days | Target wound infections between baseline (DBP D0) and D90 or EDBP were assessed for maximum severity (maximum severity was evaluated if a subject had a wound infection event evidenced by AEs). \[Note: Here, 1 event less is recorded in the control gel group as for the previous secondary outcome measure, because only wound infections that were reported as AEs could be assessed for severity and were included in this analysis.\] |
| Time to First Complete Closure of the EB Target Wound as Evidenced by Clinical Assessment Until Day 90 (D90) or End of Double-blind Phase (EDBP) | 90±7 days | The first key secondary endpoint was time to first complete closure of the EB target wound as evidenced by clinical assessment within 90 days or by EDBP, using a nonstratified log-rank test. If the primary analysis of the primary efficacy endpoint showed superiority at the 5% significance level, hierarchical confirmatory testing of the 6 key secondary endpoints was to be performed. |
| Change From Baseline (DBP D0) in Itching Using the 'Itch Man Scale' in Patients ≥ 4 Years and up to 13 Years of Age Before Wound Dressing Changes at D90 or EDBP | 90±7 days | Change from Baseline at D90 or EDBP on the Itch Man Scale in patients 4-13 years of age. The scale runs from 0 (comfortable, no itch) to 4 (itches most terribly, impossible to sit still, concentrate). |
| Change From Baseline (DBP D0) in Itching Using the 'Leuven Itch Scale' in Patients ≥ 14 Years of Age Before Wound Dressing Changes at D90 or End of Double Blind Phase (EDBP) | 90±7 days | Change in Leuven Itch Scale (patients ≥ 14 years of age) scores taken from two time points, Baseline and Day 90±7 \[End of Double Blind Phase (EDBP)\]. The Leuven Itch Scale measures six dimensions of the itch experience: Frequency Subscore (0 = Never to 100 = Always); Duration Subscore (0 = Between 0 and 30 minutes to 100 = More than 2 hours); Severity Subscore (0 = No itch to 100 = Worst possible itch); Consequences Subscore \[0 = Never to 100 = Always (lower score indicates less negative consequences from the itch)\]; Distress Subscore (0 = Not distressing at all to 100 = Very distressing); Surface Area Subscore (0-100, high values indicate more parts of the body are itching) |
| Change From Baseline (DBP D0) in Total Body Wound Burden as Evidenced by Clinical Assessment Using Section I (Assessment of the Skin Except for the Anogenital Region) of the 'EB Disease Activity and Scarring Index' (EBDASI), at D90 or EDBP | 90±7 days | The evaluation of total body wound burden (TBWB) was based on clinical assessment using Section I (Skin) of the Epidermolysis Bullosa Disease Activity and Scarring Index (EBDASI). The EBDASI skin activity (blistering/erosions/crusting) was scored from 0 to 10 for each of 10 anatomical locations (excluding the anogenital and buttocks regions). Therefore, the total skin activity score (i.e., TBWB) could range from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicative of less wound burden. The change in TBWB was assessed from baseline (DBP D0) to D90 or EDBP. |
Countries
Argentina, Australia, Austria, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Czechia, Denmark, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Singapore, Spain, Switzerland, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
All subjects satisfied the inclusion / exclusion criteria based on investigator assessment prior to entry into the study. 29 out of a total of 252 screened patients were reported as screen failures.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Oleogel-S10 Oleogel-S10: 10% birch bark extract in 90% sunflower oil | 109 |
| Control Gel Control gel: Vehicle gel (all subjects switched to Oleogel-S10 in the OLP) | 114 |
| Total | 223 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total | Control Gel | Oleogel-S10 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized 12 to <18 years | 54 Participants | 29 Participants | 25 Participants |
| Age, Customized 18 years and older | 67 Participants | 32 Participants | 35 Participants |
| Age, Customized 4 to <12 years | 85 Participants | 43 Participants | 42 Participants |
| Age, Customized < 4 years | 17 Participants | 10 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Body Mass Index (BMI) | 16.18 kg/m² STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.999 | 16.31 kg/m² STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.037 | 16.05 kg/m² STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.979 |
| Epidermolysis Bullosa Subtype DDEB (dominant dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa) | 20 Participants | 14 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Epidermolysis Bullosa Subtype EBS (epidermolysis bullosa simplex) | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Epidermolysis Bullosa Subtype JEB (junctional epidermolysis bullosa) | 26 Participants | 15 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Epidermolysis Bullosa Subtype Kindler EB | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Epidermolysis Bullosa Subtype RDEB (recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa) | 175 Participants | 84 Participants | 91 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized American Indian or Alaska Native | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 11 Participants | 7 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black or African American | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Not applicable (applies in countries where the collection of race was prohibited) | 12 Participants | 8 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other (applies if none of the races listed were appropriate or if the subject was of mixed race) | 8 Participants | 4 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Unknown | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 186 Participants | 91 Participants | 95 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Australia | 8 participants | 2 participants | 6 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Europe | 103 participants | 55 participants | 48 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Georgia | 4 participants | 3 participants | 1 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Hong Kong | 2 participants | 2 participants | 0 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Israel | 13 participants | 4 participants | 9 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Russia | 8 participants | 4 participants | 4 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Singapore | 2 participants | 1 participants | 1 participants |
| Region of Enrollment South America | 68 participants | 35 participants | 33 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Ukraine | 1 participants | 1 participants | 0 participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 14 participants | 7 participants | 7 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 89 Participants | 48 Participants | 41 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 134 Participants | 66 Participants | 68 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 109 | 0 / 114 | 7 / 100 | 2 / 105 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 89 / 109 | 92 / 114 | 77 / 100 | 81 / 105 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 7 / 109 | 6 / 114 | 26 / 100 | 24 / 105 |
Outcome results
Primary
Proportion of Patients With First Complete Closure of the EB Target Wound Within 45 Days of Treatment
Proportion of subjects with first complete closure of the EB target wound (defined as EB partial-thickness wound of 10 cm2 to 50 cm2 in size and ≥21 days to \<9 months in age) in subjects with inherited EB (subtypes DEB, JEB, or Kindler EB) within 45 days of treatment with Oleogel-S10 compared to control gel based on clinical assessment by the investigator (the wound was rated as closed at first appearance of complete re-epithelialization without drainage).
Time frame: 45±7 days
Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS)
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Oleogel-S10 | Proportion of Patients With First Complete Closure of the EB Target Wound Within 45 Days of Treatment | 45 Participants |
| Control Gel | Proportion of Patients With First Complete Closure of the EB Target Wound Within 45 Days of Treatment | 33 Participants |
p-value: 0.01395% CI: [1.02, 3.3]Cui, Hung, Wang (CHW) approach
Secondary
Change From Baseline (DBP D0) in Itching Using the 'Itch Man Scale' in Patients ≥ 4 Years and up to 13 Years of Age Before Wound Dressing Changes at D90 or EDBP
Change from Baseline at D90 or EDBP on the Itch Man Scale in patients 4-13 years of age. The scale runs from 0 (comfortable, no itch) to 4 (itches most terribly, impossible to sit still, concentrate).
Time frame: 90±7 days
Population: Patients with Itch Man Score
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oleogel-S10 | Change From Baseline (DBP D0) in Itching Using the 'Itch Man Scale' in Patients ≥ 4 Years and up to 13 Years of Age Before Wound Dressing Changes at D90 or EDBP | -0.44 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.31 |
| Control Gel | Change From Baseline (DBP D0) in Itching Using the 'Itch Man Scale' in Patients ≥ 4 Years and up to 13 Years of Age Before Wound Dressing Changes at D90 or EDBP | -1.00 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.31 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline (DBP D0) in Itching Using the 'Leuven Itch Scale' in Patients ≥ 14 Years of Age Before Wound Dressing Changes at D90 or End of Double Blind Phase (EDBP)
Change in Leuven Itch Scale (patients ≥ 14 years of age) scores taken from two time points, Baseline and Day 90±7 \[End of Double Blind Phase (EDBP)\]. The Leuven Itch Scale measures six dimensions of the itch experience: Frequency Subscore (0 = Never to 100 = Always); Duration Subscore (0 = Between 0 and 30 minutes to 100 = More than 2 hours); Severity Subscore (0 = No itch to 100 = Worst possible itch); Consequences Subscore \[0 = Never to 100 = Always (lower score indicates less negative consequences from the itch)\]; Distress Subscore (0 = Not distressing at all to 100 = Very distressing); Surface Area Subscore (0-100, high values indicate more parts of the body are itching)
Time frame: 90±7 days
Population: Patients with Leuven Itch Score
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oleogel-S10 | Change From Baseline (DBP D0) in Itching Using the 'Leuven Itch Scale' in Patients ≥ 14 Years of Age Before Wound Dressing Changes at D90 or End of Double Blind Phase (EDBP) | Frequency subscore (change from baseline) | -8.13 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.18 |
| Oleogel-S10 | Change From Baseline (DBP D0) in Itching Using the 'Leuven Itch Scale' in Patients ≥ 14 Years of Age Before Wound Dressing Changes at D90 or End of Double Blind Phase (EDBP) | Duration subscore (change from baseline) | -0.93 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 35.174 |
| Oleogel-S10 | Change From Baseline (DBP D0) in Itching Using the 'Leuven Itch Scale' in Patients ≥ 14 Years of Age Before Wound Dressing Changes at D90 or End of Double Blind Phase (EDBP) | Severity subscore (change from baseline) | -4.95 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.33 |
| Oleogel-S10 | Change From Baseline (DBP D0) in Itching Using the 'Leuven Itch Scale' in Patients ≥ 14 Years of Age Before Wound Dressing Changes at D90 or End of Double Blind Phase (EDBP) | Consequences subscore (change from baseline) | -4.39 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.073 |
| Oleogel-S10 | Change From Baseline (DBP D0) in Itching Using the 'Leuven Itch Scale' in Patients ≥ 14 Years of Age Before Wound Dressing Changes at D90 or End of Double Blind Phase (EDBP) | Distress subscore (change from baseline) | -0.44 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.87 |
| Oleogel-S10 | Change From Baseline (DBP D0) in Itching Using the 'Leuven Itch Scale' in Patients ≥ 14 Years of Age Before Wound Dressing Changes at D90 or End of Double Blind Phase (EDBP) | Surface area subscore (change from baseline) | -1.54 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.347 |
| Control Gel | Change From Baseline (DBP D0) in Itching Using the 'Leuven Itch Scale' in Patients ≥ 14 Years of Age Before Wound Dressing Changes at D90 or End of Double Blind Phase (EDBP) | Distress subscore (change from baseline) | -0.26 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 34.87 |
| Control Gel | Change From Baseline (DBP D0) in Itching Using the 'Leuven Itch Scale' in Patients ≥ 14 Years of Age Before Wound Dressing Changes at D90 or End of Double Blind Phase (EDBP) | Frequency subscore (change from baseline) | -10.14 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.3 |
| Control Gel | Change From Baseline (DBP D0) in Itching Using the 'Leuven Itch Scale' in Patients ≥ 14 Years of Age Before Wound Dressing Changes at D90 or End of Double Blind Phase (EDBP) | Consequences subscore (change from baseline) | -3.54 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.402 |
| Control Gel | Change From Baseline (DBP D0) in Itching Using the 'Leuven Itch Scale' in Patients ≥ 14 Years of Age Before Wound Dressing Changes at D90 or End of Double Blind Phase (EDBP) | Duration subscore (change from baseline) | 0.98 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 39.768 |
| Control Gel | Change From Baseline (DBP D0) in Itching Using the 'Leuven Itch Scale' in Patients ≥ 14 Years of Age Before Wound Dressing Changes at D90 or End of Double Blind Phase (EDBP) | Surface area subscore (change from baseline) | 0.68 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.082 |
| Control Gel | Change From Baseline (DBP D0) in Itching Using the 'Leuven Itch Scale' in Patients ≥ 14 Years of Age Before Wound Dressing Changes at D90 or End of Double Blind Phase (EDBP) | Severity subscore (change from baseline) | -10.76 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 32.68 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline (DBP D0) in Total Body Wound Burden as Evidenced by Clinical Assessment Using Section I (Assessment of the Skin Except for the Anogenital Region) of the 'EB Disease Activity and Scarring Index' (EBDASI), at D90 or EDBP
The evaluation of total body wound burden (TBWB) was based on clinical assessment using Section I (Skin) of the Epidermolysis Bullosa Disease Activity and Scarring Index (EBDASI). The EBDASI skin activity (blistering/erosions/crusting) was scored from 0 to 10 for each of 10 anatomical locations (excluding the anogenital and buttocks regions). Therefore, the total skin activity score (i.e., TBWB) could range from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicative of less wound burden. The change in TBWB was assessed from baseline (DBP D0) to D90 or EDBP.
Time frame: 90±7 days
Population: Patients with EBDASI skin activity score
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oleogel-S10 | Change From Baseline (DBP D0) in Total Body Wound Burden as Evidenced by Clinical Assessment Using Section I (Assessment of the Skin Except for the Anogenital Region) of the 'EB Disease Activity and Scarring Index' (EBDASI), at D90 or EDBP | -0.44 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.9 |
| Control Gel | Change From Baseline (DBP D0) in Total Body Wound Burden as Evidenced by Clinical Assessment Using Section I (Assessment of the Skin Except for the Anogenital Region) of the 'EB Disease Activity and Scarring Index' (EBDASI), at D90 or EDBP | -0.56 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.85 |
Secondary
Proportion of Patients With First Complete Closure of the EB Target Wound at D90 or EDBP Based on Clinical Assessment by the Investigator Until D90 or EDBP
The second key secondary endpoint was the proportion of subjects with first complete closure of the EB target wound within 90 days of treatment or by EDBP based on clinical assessment by the investigator.
Time frame: 90±7 days
Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS)
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Oleogel-S10 | Proportion of Patients With First Complete Closure of the EB Target Wound at D90 or EDBP Based on Clinical Assessment by the Investigator Until D90 or EDBP | 55 Participants |
| Control Gel | Proportion of Patients With First Complete Closure of the EB Target Wound at D90 or EDBP Based on Clinical Assessment by the Investigator Until D90 or EDBP | 50 Participants |
Secondary
The Incidence of EB Target Wound Infection Between Baseline (DBP D0) and D90 or EDBP as Evidenced by Adverse Events (AEs) and/or Use of Topical and/or Systemic Antibiotics (Related to Wound Infection)
The incidence of EB target wound infections between Baseline (DBP D0) and D90 or EDBP was assessed based on the total number of patients with an EB target wound infection, as evidenced by AEs and/or the use of topical and/or systemic antibiotics, and the total number of patients
Time frame: 90±7 days
Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS)
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Oleogel-S10 | The Incidence of EB Target Wound Infection Between Baseline (DBP D0) and D90 or EDBP as Evidenced by Adverse Events (AEs) and/or Use of Topical and/or Systemic Antibiotics (Related to Wound Infection) | 1 Participants |
| Control Gel | The Incidence of EB Target Wound Infection Between Baseline (DBP D0) and D90 or EDBP as Evidenced by Adverse Events (AEs) and/or Use of Topical and/or Systemic Antibiotics (Related to Wound Infection) | 5 Participants |
Secondary
The Maximum Severity of EB Target Wound Infection Between Baseline (DBP D0) and D90 or EDBP as Evidenced by AEs
Target wound infections between baseline (DBP D0) and D90 or EDBP were assessed for maximum severity (maximum severity was evaluated if a subject had a wound infection event evidenced by AEs). \[Note: Here, 1 event less is recorded in the control gel group as for the previous secondary outcome measure, because only wound infections that were reported as AEs could be assessed for severity and were included in this analysis.\]
Time frame: 90±7 days
Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS)
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oleogel-S10 | The Maximum Severity of EB Target Wound Infection Between Baseline (DBP D0) and D90 or EDBP as Evidenced by AEs | Maximum severity of wound infection: Mild | 1 Participants |
| Oleogel-S10 | The Maximum Severity of EB Target Wound Infection Between Baseline (DBP D0) and D90 or EDBP as Evidenced by AEs | Maximum severity of wound infection: Moderate | 0 Participants |
| Oleogel-S10 | The Maximum Severity of EB Target Wound Infection Between Baseline (DBP D0) and D90 or EDBP as Evidenced by AEs | Maximum severity of wound infection: Severe | 0 Participants |
| Oleogel-S10 | The Maximum Severity of EB Target Wound Infection Between Baseline (DBP D0) and D90 or EDBP as Evidenced by AEs | No wound infection | 108 Participants |
| Control Gel | The Maximum Severity of EB Target Wound Infection Between Baseline (DBP D0) and D90 or EDBP as Evidenced by AEs | No wound infection | 110 Participants |
| Control Gel | The Maximum Severity of EB Target Wound Infection Between Baseline (DBP D0) and D90 or EDBP as Evidenced by AEs | Maximum severity of wound infection: Mild | 0 Participants |
| Control Gel | The Maximum Severity of EB Target Wound Infection Between Baseline (DBP D0) and D90 or EDBP as Evidenced by AEs | Maximum severity of wound infection: Severe | 1 Participants |
| Control Gel | The Maximum Severity of EB Target Wound Infection Between Baseline (DBP D0) and D90 or EDBP as Evidenced by AEs | Maximum severity of wound infection: Moderate | 3 Participants |
Secondary
Time to First Complete Closure of the EB Target Wound as Evidenced by Clinical Assessment Until Day 90 (D90) or End of Double-blind Phase (EDBP)
The first key secondary endpoint was time to first complete closure of the EB target wound as evidenced by clinical assessment within 90 days or by EDBP, using a nonstratified log-rank test. If the primary analysis of the primary efficacy endpoint showed superiority at the 5% significance level, hierarchical confirmatory testing of the 6 key secondary endpoints was to be performed.
Time frame: 90±7 days
Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS)
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Oleogel-S10 | Time to First Complete Closure of the EB Target Wound as Evidenced by Clinical Assessment Until Day 90 (D90) or End of Double-blind Phase (EDBP) | 92.0 days |
| Control Gel | Time to First Complete Closure of the EB Target Wound as Evidenced by Clinical Assessment Until Day 90 (D90) or End of Double-blind Phase (EDBP) | 94.0 days |
p-value: 0.302Chi-squared