Rhino Sinusitis
Conditions
Keywords
bilateral chronic rhino sinusitis
Brief summary
This study is a prospective comparison between absorbable hemostatic agents as a group and the body's natural hemostatic ability without aid of therapy in patients undergoing bilateral sinus surgery with or without septoplasty.
Detailed description
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of absorbable hemostatic agents in comparison with physiologic hemostasis after endoscopic sinus surgery. The investigators aim to determine the relative efficacy of hemostatic agents to halt epistaxis and compare this with the degree of epistaxis observed without therapy and evaluate objective healing parameters.
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
After sinus surgery, the surgeon will randomize the patient to one of six hemostatic agents and place that product in one sinus cavity, while leaving the other sinus cavity without packing. The treatment group will be compared to control.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
-≥18 to \<75 years of age with bilateral chronic or recurrent rhino sinusitis recalcitrant to medical therapy that requires endoscopic sinus surgery -sinuses should have a similar degree of disease involvement bilaterally.
Exclusion criteria
* massive sinonasal polyposis, * history of underlying immunologic diseases, AIDS, cystic fibrosis, immunoglobulin deficiency, immotile cilia syndrome, and neutropenia, * known hypersensitivity to the aforementioned agents, * women who are pregnant or breastfeeding, * anyone with a known allergy to any of the treatments (potato starch, iodine, shellfish) * anyone with a known coagulopathy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of participants with superior healing qualities after use of hemostatic agents compared to physiologic hemostasis after endoscopic sinus surgery. | 6 weeks post-operative | Participants will be monitored for 6 weeks. Means and standard deviations will be obtained for data collected from patient surveys rating subjective symptoms such as nasal obstruction, bleeding, pain, and nasal discharge on a scale ranging from 1-10 and investigator surveys evaluating the qualities of the patient's recovery (synechiae formation, granulation, edema, infection, and time spent debriding the sinuses) in response to intervention and compare this with the degree of epistaxis observed without therapy. |