Skip to content

Study of BIIB092 in Participants With Progressive Supranuclear Palsy

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenously Administered BIIB092 in Participants With Progressive Supranuclear Palsy

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03068468
Acronym
PASSPORT
Enrollment
490
Registered
2017-03-01
Start date
2017-06-01
Completion date
2020-02-07
Last updated
2020-12-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Supranuclear Palsy, Progressive

Brief summary

The Primary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of BIIB092, compared to placebo, as measured by a change from baseline in the PSP Rating Scale (PSPRS) at Week 52 and to assess the safety and tolerability of BIIB092, relative to placebo, by measuring the frequency of deaths, SAEs, AEs leading to discontinuation, and Grade 3 & 4 laboratory abnormalities. The Secondary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of BIIB092, compared to placebo, as measured by a change in baseline in the Movement Disorder Society (MDS)-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part II at Week 52, to evaluate the efficacy of BIIB092, compared to placebo, as measured by the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) at Week 52, to evaluate the efficacy of BIIB092, compared to placebo, as measured by a change in baseline in the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Disease Severity (RBANS) at Week 52 and to assess the impact of BIIB092 on quality of life, relative to placebo, as measured by change from baseline on the Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Quality of Life scale (PSP-QoL) at Week 52.

Detailed description

This study, previously posted by Bristol-Myers Squibb, has transitioned to Biogen under a licensing agreement.

Interventions

BIIB092 intravenous infusion on specified days

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo intravenous infusion on specified days

Sponsors

Biogen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
41 Years to 86 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Participants with probable or possible PSP * Able to ambulate independently or with assistance * Able to tolerate MRI * Have reliable caregiver to accompany participant to all study visits * Score greater or equal to 20 on the Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) at screening * Participant must reside outside a skilled nursing facility or dementia care facility at the time of screening and admission to such a facility must not be planned Key

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of other significant neurological or psychiatric disorders * Diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) or other motor neuron disease * History of early, prominent rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder * History of or screening brain MRI scan indicative of significant abnormality * Known history of serum or plasma progranulin level less than one standard deviation below the normal patient mean for the laboratory performing the assay NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Rating Scale (PSPRS) at Week 52Baseline, Week 52The PSPRS is a quantitative measure of disability in participants with PSP. The PSPRS comprises 28 items in 6 areas. Six items are rated on a 3-point scale (0-2) and 22 are rated on a 5-point scale (0-4). The 6 areas are the History/Daily Activities, Mentation, Bulbar, Ocular Motor, Limb Motor, and Gait. The 28-item PSPRS total score ranges from 0 (normal) to 100. Fifteen items are selected to form a 15-item PSPRS and three domains are identified: Gait/Limb function, Ocular Motor, and Bulbar. The total 15-item PSPRS score ranges from 0 (normal) to 52. A positive change from baseline indicates worsening.
Percentage of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation of Drugup to 52 weeksAEs: any sign, symptom, or diagnosis/disease that is unfavorable or unintended, that is new, or if pre-existing, worsens in participants administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. SAEs: an event that results in death; an event that, in the view of the investigator, places the participant at immediate risk of death (a life-threatening event); an outcome that results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect diagnosed in a child of a participant; an event that requires or prolongs inpatient hospitalization; an event that results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP)-Cognitive Composite Battery Z-Score at Week 52Baseline, Week 52The PSP cognitive composite battery is used to identify and characterize abnormal cognitive decline in PSP participants. The PSP cognitive composite battery includes 13 sub-tests in total: 11 tests from the RBANS (only the picture naming is excluded), letter number sequencing test, and phonemic fluency test. Three domains are identified: Memory and learning, Visual-Motor function, and Working memory and Executive. A z-score transformation is applied for each component test at each visit, and the final total composite z-score is the average of the three-domain z-scores. A z-score of 0 is equal to the estimated mean adjusted by age and is considered average for this study population. Lower values are indicative of cognitive decline. A negative change from baseline indicates worsening.
Change From Baseline in Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Disease Severity (RBANS) Scale at Week 52Baseline, Week 52The RBANS provides both a total scale score and scores for 5 different cognitive domains. Specifically, the test measures immediate memory, visuospatial/constructional ability, language, attention, and delayed memory. Scores from all subtests are aggregated into a total composite score. RBANS data were age-normed and analyzed as index scores (also referred to as standard scores), which have a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. Higher scores on each sub measure and index indicate better performance. A negative change from baseline indicates worsening.
Change From Baseline in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Quality of Life Scale (PSP-QoL) ScoreBaseline, Week 52The PSP-QoL is a patient-reported outcome measure developed specifically for assessing the health-related quality of life in people living with PSP. It is validated 45-item questionnaire and visual analog scale that is comprised of 2 subscales: physical health state (22 items), which covers mobility, dysarthria, dysphagia, visual disturbances, self-care, and activities of daily living, and mental health state (23 items), which covers emotional, cognitive and social functioning. Items are given a 6-reponse option format (No Problem, Slight Problem, Moderate Problem, Marked Problem, Extreme Problem and Not Applicable). The subscale results are derived by summing the respective items for that subscale and transforming the scores into a range of 0 to 100, the higher the scores indicating a greater impact of the disease on the aspect measured. The PSP-QoL also comprises of a Life Satisfaction rating gauge, which is a visual analog scale with a range of 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Change From Baseline in Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living (SEADL) Scale Score at Week 48Baseline, Week 48The SEADL scale is a means of assessing a person's ability to perform daily activities in terms of speed and independence, with 100% indicating total independence, falling to 0%, which indicates a state of complete dependence. The individual is asked to rate his or her function using an 11-point scale (10% increments), from 100% (completely independent; able to do all chores without slowness, difficulty, or impairment; essentially normal; unaware of any difficulty) to 0% (vegetative functions such as swallowing, bladder and bowels are not functioning; bedridden). A negative change from baseline indicates worsening.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 52Baseline, Week 52The Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Rating evaluates the severity of individual symptoms and treatment response in participants with mental disorders. The CGI-S is a 7-point scale that that requires the clinician to rate the severity of the patient's illness at the time of assessment. A rating of 1 is considered normal, or with the least severe symptoms, a rating of 7 is extremely ill, or the worst symptoms.
Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Society (MDS)-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part II at Week 52Baseline, Week 52The MDS-UPRDRS Part 2 includes 13 items assessing motor aspects of experiences of daily living (M-EDL) these include speech, saliva and drooling, chewing and swallowing, handwriting, doing hobbies and other activities, eating tasks, tremor, dressing, hygiene, turning in bed, getting out of bed, walking and balance, and freezing. All items have 5 responses with uniform anchors of 0= normal, 1= slight, 2= mild, 3= moderate, and 4= severe. Total score ranges from 0 to 52, higher score indicating severe conditions. A positive change from baseline indicates worsening.
Change From Baseline in Letter-Number Sequencing Test at Week 48Baseline, Week 48Letter number is a test of working memory which involves ordering a series of up to 8 letters and numbers in which the numbers are repeated back first in order starting with the lowest number, then followed by the letters in alphabetical order. LNS consists of 10 items and each item has 3 trials rated as Incorrect (0) or Correct (1). The LNS total raw score (range 0 to 30) is auto-calculated by summing the 10 individual item scores (range 0 to 3 for each item). Higher number of correct items correlated to better performance and a negative change from baseline indicates worsening.
Change From Baseline in Color Trails at Week 48Baseline, Week 48The Color Trails test is a language free version of the Trail Making Test and was developed to allow for broader cross cultural assessment. For Part 1 (color trails test 1), the respondent uses a pencil to rapidly connect circles numbered 1-25 in sequence. For Part 2 (color trails test 2), the respondent rapidly connects number circles in sequence, but alternates between pink and yellow background. The length of time to complete each trial is recorded, along with qualitative features of performance indicative of brain dysfunction, such as near-misses, prompts, number sequence errors, and color sequence errors. Less time indicates better performance. A positive change from baseline indicates worsening.
Change From Baseline in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Score at Week 48Baseline, Week 48The MOCA was designed as a rapid screening instrument for mild cognitive dysfunction. It assesses different cognitive domains: attention and concentration, executive function, memory, language, visuoconstructional skills, conceptual thinking, calculations, and orientation. Scores on the MOCA range from 0-30, with higher score being better performance. A negative change from baseline indicates worsening.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Antibodies (Anti-BIIB092) Positive Results in SerumUp to Week 48
Change From Baseline of Brain Volumes as Determined by MRI at Week 52Baseline, Week 52A 3 dimension (3D) T1-weighted MRI was performed to estimate brain volumes (e.g., ventricles, whole brain, midbrain, pons, superior cerebellar peduncle, third ventricle, and frontal lobes).
Change From Baseline in Phonemic Fluency Test Score at Week 48Baseline, Week 48Phonemic fluency is a sensitive test for assessing frontal lobe dysfunction. Participants are given a letter of the alphabet and asked to name as many words as they can that start with that letter in 1 minute. The score for each trial is auto-calculated as follows: Trial 1: Total number of correct responses for the first letter (range 0 to 40); Trial 2: Total number of correct responses for the second letter (range 0 to 40). The total score from the two trials will be used for analysis (range 0 to 80). More number of words correlates to better phonemic fluency. A negative change from baseline indicates worsening.
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Scale ScoreWeek 52The CGI-C scale measures the change in the patient's clinical status from a specific point in time. Using a 7-point scale, ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), with a score of 4 indicating no change.

Countries

Australia, Austria, Canada, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Japan, Russia, South Korea, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled at 89 investigative sites in the United States, Australia, Austria, Canada, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Russia Federation, Spain and United Kingdom from June 01, 2017 to February 07, 2020.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 490 participants with Progressive Supranuclear Palsy disease were enrolled and randomised in the study. Of these, 486 participants received the study drug in placebo-controlled (PC) period. After completing PC period, 416 participants entered and dosed in open-label extension (OLE) period and no participants completed the study due to early termination of the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo (PC Period)
Participants assigned to BIIB092 matching placebo intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 48 weeks in double blind PC period and receive only placebo.
165
BIIB092 2000 mg (PC Period)
Participants who received at least one dose of BIIB092 2000 mg and were either assigned to BIIB092 2000 milligrams (mg) IV infusion or BIIB092 matching placebo IV infusion once every 4 weeks for 48 weeks in double blind PC period.
321
Total486

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Open-Label Extension PeriodAdverse Event001317
Open-Label Extension PeriodDeath0001
Open-Label Extension PeriodFailure to Meet Randomization Criteria0020
Open-Label Extension PeriodLack of Efficacy0012
Open-Label Extension PeriodLost to Follow-up0010
Open-Label Extension PeriodReason not Specified0014
Open-Label Extension PeriodWithdrawal by Parent/Guardian0004
Open-Label Extension PeriodWithdrawal by Sponsor00115228
Open-Label Extension PeriodWithdrawal by Subject00720
Placebo-Controlled PeriodAdverse Event162100
Placebo-Controlled PeriodDeath0100
Placebo-Controlled PeriodLack of Efficacy0100
Placebo-Controlled PeriodRandomized but not Treated1300
Placebo-Controlled PeriodReason Not Specified1600
Placebo-Controlled PeriodWithdrawal by Parent/Guardian1200
Placebo-Controlled PeriodWithdrawal by Subject31100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBIIB092 2000 mg (PC Period)TotalPlacebo (PC Period)
Age, Continuous68.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.02
68.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.86
68.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.57
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
7 Participants12 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
242 Participants359 Participants117 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
72 Participants115 Participants43 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Asian Indian
3 Participants6 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Asian Other
10 Participants14 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Black or African American
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Chinese
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Japanese
23 Participants39 Participants16 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Unknown
2 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
White
281 Participants419 Participants138 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
136 Participants210 Participants74 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
185 Participants276 Participants91 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
8 / 16216 / 32410 / 13716 / 279
other
Total, other adverse events
127 / 162235 / 32469 / 137130 / 279
serious
Total, serious adverse events
52 / 16288 / 32440 / 13763 / 279

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Rating Scale (PSPRS) at Week 52

The PSPRS is a quantitative measure of disability in participants with PSP. The PSPRS comprises 28 items in 6 areas. Six items are rated on a 3-point scale (0-2) and 22 are rated on a 5-point scale (0-4). The 6 areas are the History/Daily Activities, Mentation, Bulbar, Ocular Motor, Limb Motor, and Gait. The 28-item PSPRS total score ranges from 0 (normal) to 100. Fifteen items are selected to form a 15-item PSPRS and three domains are identified: Gait/Limb function, Ocular Motor, and Bulbar. The total 15-item PSPRS score ranges from 0 (normal) to 52. A positive change from baseline indicates worsening.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: ITT population included randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of blinded study treatment (BIIB092 or Placebo). 'Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants who had response on Week 52.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (PC Period)Change From Baseline in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Rating Scale (PSPRS) at Week 52PSPRS: 28 items10.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.8
Placebo (PC Period)Change From Baseline in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Rating Scale (PSPRS) at Week 52PSPRS: 15 items7.57 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.52
BIIB092 2000 mg (PC Period)Change From Baseline in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Rating Scale (PSPRS) at Week 52PSPRS: 28 items10.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.6
BIIB092 2000 mg (PC Period)Change From Baseline in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Rating Scale (PSPRS) at Week 52PSPRS: 15 items7.29 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
Comparison: 28-item:Adjusted mean for each treatment group, difference with Placebo,95% confidence interval and p-value at each time point were based on a mixed model for repeated measures model (MMRM), with change from baseline in 28-item PSPRS total score as dependent variable and with fixed effects of treatment group, time(categorical), treatment group-by-time interaction, baseline 28-item PSPRS, baseline 28-item PSPRS by time interaction, baseline Color Trails 2 test (\<=170 or \>170 seconds) and region.p-value: 0.848395% CI: [-2, 1.6]Mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM)
Comparison: 15-items:Adjusted mean for each treatment group, difference with Placebo,95% confidence interval and p-value at each time point were based on an MMRM model, with change from baseline in 15-item PSPRS total score as dependent variable and with fixed effects of treatment group, time(categorical), treatment groupby-time interaction, baseline 15-item PSPRS, baseline 15-item PSPRS by time interaction, baseline Color Trails 2 test(\<=170 or \>170 seconds) and region.p-value: 0.650395% CI: [-1.5, 0.94]MMRM
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation of Drug

AEs: any sign, symptom, or diagnosis/disease that is unfavorable or unintended, that is new, or if pre-existing, worsens in participants administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. SAEs: an event that results in death; an event that, in the view of the investigator, places the participant at immediate risk of death (a life-threatening event); an outcome that results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect diagnosed in a child of a participant; an event that requires or prolongs inpatient hospitalization; an event that results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity.

Time frame: up to 52 weeks

Population: Safety population included all randomized participants who had received at least one dose of study treatment (BIIB092 or Placebo). Participants randomized to Placebo that received at least one dose of BIIB092 2000 mg during the placebo-controlled period will be counted in the BIIB092 2000 mg group for the safety population. Three participants who received BIIB092 in Placebo group were counted in BIIB092 200 mg group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo (PC Period)Percentage of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation of DrugAEs93.2 Percentage of participants
Placebo (PC Period)Percentage of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation of DrugSAEs32.1 Percentage of participants
Placebo (PC Period)Percentage of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation of DrugAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Drug11.1 Percentage of participants
Placebo (PC Period)Percentage of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation of DrugDeath4.9 Percentage of participants
BIIB092 2000 mg (PC Period)Percentage of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation of DrugAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Drug7.4 Percentage of participants
BIIB092 2000 mg (PC Period)Percentage of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation of DrugSAEs27.2 Percentage of participants
BIIB092 2000 mg (PC Period)Percentage of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation of DrugAEs92.9 Percentage of participants
BIIB092 2000 mg (PC Period)Percentage of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) and Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation of DrugDeath4.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 52

The Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Rating evaluates the severity of individual symptoms and treatment response in participants with mental disorders. The CGI-S is a 7-point scale that that requires the clinician to rate the severity of the patient's illness at the time of assessment. A rating of 1 is considered normal, or with the least severe symptoms, a rating of 7 is extremely ill, or the worst symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: ITT population included randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of blinded study treatment (BIIB092 or Placebo). 'Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies total number of participants analyzed in this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (PC Period)Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 520.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
BIIB092 2000 mg (PC Period)Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 520.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0
Comparison: Adjusted mean for each treatment group, difference with Placebo, 95% confidence interval and p-value at each time point were based on an MMRM model, with change from baseline in CGI-S as dependent variable and with fixed effects of treatment group, time (categorical), treatment group-by-time interaction, baseline for CGI-S, baseline CGI-S by time interaction, baseline Color Trails 2 test (\<=170 or \>170 seconds) and region.p-value: 0.570195% CI: [-0.2, 0.1]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Color Trails at Week 48

The Color Trails test is a language free version of the Trail Making Test and was developed to allow for broader cross cultural assessment. For Part 1 (color trails test 1), the respondent uses a pencil to rapidly connect circles numbered 1-25 in sequence. For Part 2 (color trails test 2), the respondent rapidly connects number circles in sequence, but alternates between pink and yellow background. The length of time to complete each trial is recorded, along with qualitative features of performance indicative of brain dysfunction, such as near-misses, prompts, number sequence errors, and color sequence errors. Less time indicates better performance. A positive change from baseline indicates worsening.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: ITT population included randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of blinded study treatment (BIIB092 or Placebo). 'Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies total number of participants analyzed in this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (PC Period)Change From Baseline in Color Trails at Week 48Color Trails Test 210.6 SecondsStandard Error 2.4
Placebo (PC Period)Change From Baseline in Color Trails at Week 48Color Trails Test 116.8 SecondsStandard Error 3.6
BIIB092 2000 mg (PC Period)Change From Baseline in Color Trails at Week 48Color Trails Test 210.5 SecondsStandard Error 1.8
BIIB092 2000 mg (PC Period)Change From Baseline in Color Trails at Week 48Color Trails Test 116.9 SecondsStandard Error 2.7
Comparison: Color Trails Test 1: Adjusted mean for each treatment group, difference with Placebo, 95% confidence interval and p-value at each time point were based on an MMRM model, with change from baseline in Color trails Test 1 as dependent variable and with fixed effects of treatment group, time (categorical), treatment group-by-time interaction, baseline for Color Trails Test 1, baseline Color Trails Test 1 by time interaction, baseline Color Trails 2 test (\<=170 or \>170 seconds) and region.p-value: 0.981595% CI: [-8.1, 8.3]MMRM
Comparison: Color Trails Test 2: Adjusted mean for each treatment group, difference with Placebo, 95% confidence interval and p-value at each time point were based on an MMRM model, with change from baseline in Color Trails Test 2 as dependent variable and with fixed effects of treatment group, time (categorical), treatment group-by-time interaction, baseline for Color Trails Test 2, baseline Color Trails Test 2 by time interaction, and region.p-value: 0.986995% CI: [-5.7, 5.6]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Letter-Number Sequencing Test at Week 48

Letter number is a test of working memory which involves ordering a series of up to 8 letters and numbers in which the numbers are repeated back first in order starting with the lowest number, then followed by the letters in alphabetical order. LNS consists of 10 items and each item has 3 trials rated as Incorrect (0) or Correct (1). The LNS total raw score (range 0 to 30) is auto-calculated by summing the 10 individual item scores (range 0 to 3 for each item). Higher number of correct items correlated to better performance and a negative change from baseline indicates worsening.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: ITT population included randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of blinded study treatment (BIIB092 or Placebo). 'Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies total number of participants analyzed in this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (PC Period)Change From Baseline in Letter-Number Sequencing Test at Week 48-1.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
BIIB092 2000 mg (PC Period)Change From Baseline in Letter-Number Sequencing Test at Week 48-1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Comparison: Adjusted mean for each treatment group, difference with Placebo, 95% confidence interval and p-value at each time point were based on an MMRM model, with change from baseline in Letter Number Sequence as dependent variable and with fixed effects of treatment group, time (categorical), treatment group-by-time interaction, baseline Letter Number Sequence, baseline Letter Number Sequence by time interaction, baseline Color Trails 2 test (\<=170 or \>170 seconds) and region.p-value: 0.038795% CI: [0, 1.7]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Score at Week 48

The MOCA was designed as a rapid screening instrument for mild cognitive dysfunction. It assesses different cognitive domains: attention and concentration, executive function, memory, language, visuoconstructional skills, conceptual thinking, calculations, and orientation. Scores on the MOCA range from 0-30, with higher score being better performance. A negative change from baseline indicates worsening.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: ITT population included randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of blinded study treatment (BIIB092 or Placebo). 'Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies total number of participants analyzed in this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (PC Period)Change From Baseline in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Score at Week 48-1.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
BIIB092 2000 mg (PC Period)Change From Baseline in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Score at Week 48-0.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Comparison: Adjusted mean for each treatment group, difference with Placebo, 95% confidence interval and p-value at each time point were based on an MMRM model, with change from baseline in MoCA as dependent variable and with fixed effects of treatment group, time (categorical), treatment group-by-time interaction, baseline for MoCA, baseline MoCA by time interaction,baseline Color Trails 2 test (\<=170 or \>170 seconds) and region.p-value: 0.176395% CI: [-0.2, 1.2]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Society (MDS)-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part II at Week 52

The MDS-UPRDRS Part 2 includes 13 items assessing motor aspects of experiences of daily living (M-EDL) these include speech, saliva and drooling, chewing and swallowing, handwriting, doing hobbies and other activities, eating tasks, tremor, dressing, hygiene, turning in bed, getting out of bed, walking and balance, and freezing. All items have 5 responses with uniform anchors of 0= normal, 1= slight, 2= mild, 3= moderate, and 4= severe. Total score ranges from 0 to 52, higher score indicating severe conditions. A positive change from baseline indicates worsening.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: ITT population included randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of blinded study treatment (BIIB092 or Placebo). 'Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies total number of participants analyzed in this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (PC Period)Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Society (MDS)-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part II at Week 526.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.6
BIIB092 2000 mg (PC Period)Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder Society (MDS)-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part II at Week 527.0 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
Comparison: Adjusted mean for each treatment group, difference with Placebo, 95% confidence interval and p-value at each time point were based on an MMRM model, with change from baseline in MDS-UPDRS as dependent variable and with fixed effects of treatment group, time (categorical), treatment group-by-time interaction, baseline MDS-UPDRS, baseline MDS-UPDRS by time interaction, baseline Color Trails 2 test (\<=170 or \>170 seconds) and region.p-value: 0.603195% CI: [-1, 1.7]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Phonemic Fluency Test Score at Week 48

Phonemic fluency is a sensitive test for assessing frontal lobe dysfunction. Participants are given a letter of the alphabet and asked to name as many words as they can that start with that letter in 1 minute. The score for each trial is auto-calculated as follows: Trial 1: Total number of correct responses for the first letter (range 0 to 40); Trial 2: Total number of correct responses for the second letter (range 0 to 40). The total score from the two trials will be used for analysis (range 0 to 80). More number of words correlates to better phonemic fluency. A negative change from baseline indicates worsening.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: ITT population included randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of blinded study treatment (BIIB092 or Placebo). 'Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies total number of participants analyzed in this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (PC Period)Change From Baseline in Phonemic Fluency Test Score at Week 48-0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
BIIB092 2000 mg (PC Period)Change From Baseline in Phonemic Fluency Test Score at Week 480.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
Comparison: Adjusted mean for each treatment group, difference with Placebo, 95% confidence interval and p-value at each time point were based on an MMRM model, with change from baseline in Phonemic Fluency Test as dependent variable and with fixed effects of treatment group, time (categorical), treatment group-by-time interaction, baseline Phonemic Fluency Test, baseline Phonemic Fluency Test by time interaction, baseline Color Trails 2 test (\<=170 or \>170 seconds) and region.p-value: 0.051795% CI: [0, 1.8]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP)-Cognitive Composite Battery Z-Score at Week 52

The PSP cognitive composite battery is used to identify and characterize abnormal cognitive decline in PSP participants. The PSP cognitive composite battery includes 13 sub-tests in total: 11 tests from the RBANS (only the picture naming is excluded), letter number sequencing test, and phonemic fluency test. Three domains are identified: Memory and learning, Visual-Motor function, and Working memory and Executive. A z-score transformation is applied for each component test at each visit, and the final total composite z-score is the average of the three-domain z-scores. A z-score of 0 is equal to the estimated mean adjusted by age and is considered average for this study population. Lower values are indicative of cognitive decline. A negative change from baseline indicates worsening.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: ITT population included randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of blinded study treatment (BIIB092 or Placebo). 'Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the total number of participants analyzed in this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (PC Period)Change From Baseline in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP)-Cognitive Composite Battery Z-Score at Week 52-0.283 z-scoreStandard Error 0.032
BIIB092 2000 mg (PC Period)Change From Baseline in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP)-Cognitive Composite Battery Z-Score at Week 52-0.245 z-scoreStandard Error 0.024
Comparison: Adjusted mean for each treatment group, difference with Placebo, 95% confidence interval and p-value at each time point were based on an MMRM model, with change from baseline in PSP-cognitive composite battery as dependent variable and with fixed effects of treatment group, time (categorical), treatment group-by-time interaction, baseline PSP-cognitive composite battery, baseline PSP-cognitive composite battery by time interaction, baseline Color Trails 2 test (\<=170 or \>170 seconds) and region.p-value: 0.31895% CI: [-0.036, 0.112]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Quality of Life Scale (PSP-QoL) Score

The PSP-QoL is a patient-reported outcome measure developed specifically for assessing the health-related quality of life in people living with PSP. It is validated 45-item questionnaire and visual analog scale that is comprised of 2 subscales: physical health state (22 items), which covers mobility, dysarthria, dysphagia, visual disturbances, self-care, and activities of daily living, and mental health state (23 items), which covers emotional, cognitive and social functioning. Items are given a 6-reponse option format (No Problem, Slight Problem, Moderate Problem, Marked Problem, Extreme Problem and Not Applicable). The subscale results are derived by summing the respective items for that subscale and transforming the scores into a range of 0 to 100, the higher the scores indicating a greater impact of the disease on the aspect measured. The PSP-QoL also comprises of a Life Satisfaction rating gauge, which is a visual analog scale with a range of 0 (worst) to 100 (best).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: ITT population included randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of blinded study treatment (BIIB092 or Placebo). 'Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants who had response on Week 52. 'Number Analyzed' signifies the number of participants who were evaluated for the specified parameter.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (PC Period)Change From Baseline in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Quality of Life Scale (PSP-QoL) ScoreSatisfaction With Your Life Today-3.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.8
Placebo (PC Period)Change From Baseline in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Quality of Life Scale (PSP-QoL) ScorePhysical Scale Score11.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.5
Placebo (PC Period)Change From Baseline in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Quality of Life Scale (PSP-QoL) ScoreMental Scale Score5.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.4
BIIB092 2000 mg (PC Period)Change From Baseline in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Quality of Life Scale (PSP-QoL) ScorePhysical Scale Score11.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.1
BIIB092 2000 mg (PC Period)Change From Baseline in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Quality of Life Scale (PSP-QoL) ScoreMental Scale Score6.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1
BIIB092 2000 mg (PC Period)Change From Baseline in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Quality of Life Scale (PSP-QoL) ScoreSatisfaction With Your Life Today-5.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.3
Comparison: Physical scale score: Adjusted mean for each treatment group, difference with Placebo, 95% confidence interval and p-value at each time point were based on an MMRM model, with change from baseline in PSP-QoL as dependent variable and with fixed effects of treatment group, time (categorical), treatment group-by-time interaction, baseline for PSP-QoL, baseline PSP-QoL by time interaction, baseline Color Trails 2 test (\<=170 or \>170 seconds) and region.p-value: 0.930495% CI: [-3.6, 3.3]MMRM
Comparison: Mental scale score: Adjusted mean for each treatment group, difference with Placebo, 95% confidence interval and p-value at each time point were based on an MMRM model, with change from baseline in PSPQoL as dependent variable and with fixed effects of treatment group, time (categorical), treatment group-bytime interaction, baseline for PSP-QoL, baseline PSP-QoL by time interaction, baseline Color Trails 2 test (\<=170 or \>170 seconds) and region.p-value: 0.785995% CI: [-2.8, 3.7]MMRM
Comparison: Satisfaction With Your Life Today: Adjusted mean for each treatment group, difference with Placebo, 95% confidence interval and p-value at each time point were based on an MMRM model, with change from baseline in PSPQoL as dependent variable and with fixed effects of treatment group, time (categorical), treatment group-bytime interaction, baseline for PSP-QoL, baseline PSP-QoL by time interaction, baseline Color Trails 2 test (\<=170 or \>170 seconds) and region.p-value: 0.429795% CI: [-5.8, 2.5]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Disease Severity (RBANS) Scale at Week 52

The RBANS provides both a total scale score and scores for 5 different cognitive domains. Specifically, the test measures immediate memory, visuospatial/constructional ability, language, attention, and delayed memory. Scores from all subtests are aggregated into a total composite score. RBANS data were age-normed and analyzed as index scores (also referred to as standard scores), which have a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. Higher scores on each sub measure and index indicate better performance. A negative change from baseline indicates worsening.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: ITT population included randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of blinded study treatment (BIIB092 or Placebo). 'Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies total number of participants analyzed in this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (PC Period)Change From Baseline in Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Disease Severity (RBANS) Scale at Week 52-3.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
BIIB092 2000 mg (PC Period)Change From Baseline in Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Disease Severity (RBANS) Scale at Week 52-3.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
Comparison: Adjusted mean for each treatment group, difference with Placebo, 95% confidence interval and p-value at each time point were based on an MMRM model, with change from baseline in RBANS as dependent variable and with fixed effects of treatment group, time (categorical), treatment group-by-time interaction, baseline RBANS , baseline RBANS by time interaction, baseline Color Trails 2 test (\<=170 or \>170 seconds and region.p-value: 0.82795% CI: [-1.8, 1.4]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living (SEADL) Scale Score at Week 48

The SEADL scale is a means of assessing a person's ability to perform daily activities in terms of speed and independence, with 100% indicating total independence, falling to 0%, which indicates a state of complete dependence. The individual is asked to rate his or her function using an 11-point scale (10% increments), from 100% (completely independent; able to do all chores without slowness, difficulty, or impairment; essentially normal; unaware of any difficulty) to 0% (vegetative functions such as swallowing, bladder and bowels are not functioning; bedridden). A negative change from baseline indicates worsening.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: ITT population included randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of blinded study treatment (BIIB092 or Placebo). 'Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies total number of participants analyzed in this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (PC Period)Change From Baseline in Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living (SEADL) Scale Score at Week 48-13.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.4
BIIB092 2000 mg (PC Period)Change From Baseline in Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living (SEADL) Scale Score at Week 48-11.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1
Comparison: Adjusted mean for each treatment group, difference with Placebo, 95% confidence interval and p-value at each time point were based on an MMRM model, with change from baseline in SEADL as dependent variable and with fixed effects of treatment group, time (categorical), treatment group-by-time interaction, baseline for SEADL , baseline SEADL by time interaction, baseline Color Trails 2 test (\<=170 or \>170 seconds) and region.p-value: 0.208495% CI: [-1.1, 5.2]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline of Brain Volumes as Determined by MRI at Week 52

A 3 dimension (3D) T1-weighted MRI was performed to estimate brain volumes (e.g., ventricles, whole brain, midbrain, pons, superior cerebellar peduncle, third ventricle, and frontal lobes).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: Efficacy MRI population is the subset of the ITT population who had a least one measurable brain volumetric measurement. 'Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies number of participants who had response on Week 52. 'Number Analyzed' signifies the number of participants who were evaluated for the specified parameter.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (PC Period)Change From Baseline of Brain Volumes as Determined by MRI at Week 52Midbrain Volume: Change at Week 52-0.116 Cubic centimeter (cm^3)Standard Error 0.008
Placebo (PC Period)Change From Baseline of Brain Volumes as Determined by MRI at Week 52Cerebellar Peduncle Volume: Change at Week 52-0.005 Cubic centimeter (cm^3)Standard Error 0.002
Placebo (PC Period)Change From Baseline of Brain Volumes as Determined by MRI at Week 52Whole Brain Volume: Change at Week 52-18.612 Cubic centimeter (cm^3)Standard Error 1.296
Placebo (PC Period)Change From Baseline of Brain Volumes as Determined by MRI at Week 52Third Ventricle Volume: Change at Week 520.140 Cubic centimeter (cm^3)Standard Error 0.014
Placebo (PC Period)Change From Baseline of Brain Volumes as Determined by MRI at Week 52Pons Volume: Change at Week 52-0.198 Cubic centimeter (cm^3)Standard Error 0.017
Placebo (PC Period)Change From Baseline of Brain Volumes as Determined by MRI at Week 52Frontal Lobe Volume: Change at Week 521.184 Cubic centimeter (cm^3)Standard Error 0.279
Placebo (PC Period)Change From Baseline of Brain Volumes as Determined by MRI at Week 52Ventricles Volume: Change at Week 523.823 Cubic centimeter (cm^3)Standard Error 0.302
BIIB092 2000 mg (PC Period)Change From Baseline of Brain Volumes as Determined by MRI at Week 52Frontal Lobe Volume: Change at Week 521.143 Cubic centimeter (cm^3)Standard Error 0.205
BIIB092 2000 mg (PC Period)Change From Baseline of Brain Volumes as Determined by MRI at Week 52Ventricles Volume: Change at Week 523.802 Cubic centimeter (cm^3)Standard Error 0.216
BIIB092 2000 mg (PC Period)Change From Baseline of Brain Volumes as Determined by MRI at Week 52Whole Brain Volume: Change at Week 52-19.126 Cubic centimeter (cm^3)Standard Error 0.95
BIIB092 2000 mg (PC Period)Change From Baseline of Brain Volumes as Determined by MRI at Week 52Midbrain Volume: Change at Week 52-0.120 Cubic centimeter (cm^3)Standard Error 0.006
BIIB092 2000 mg (PC Period)Change From Baseline of Brain Volumes as Determined by MRI at Week 52Pons Volume: Change at Week 52-0.198 Cubic centimeter (cm^3)Standard Error 0.012
BIIB092 2000 mg (PC Period)Change From Baseline of Brain Volumes as Determined by MRI at Week 52Cerebellar Peduncle Volume: Change at Week 52-0.004 Cubic centimeter (cm^3)Standard Error 0.002
BIIB092 2000 mg (PC Period)Change From Baseline of Brain Volumes as Determined by MRI at Week 52Third Ventricle Volume: Change at Week 520.146 Cubic centimeter (cm^3)Standard Error 0.01
Comparison: Ventricles Volume: Adjusted mean for each treatment group, difference with Placebo, 95% confidence interval and p-value at each time point were based on an MMRM model, with change from baseline in MRI region as dependent variable and with fixed effects of treatment group, time (categorical), treatment group-by-time interaction, baseline for MRI region, baseline MRI region by time interaction, baseline Color Trails 2 test (\<=170 or \>170 seconds) and region.p-value: 0.952795% CI: [-0.726, 0.684]MMRM
Comparison: Whole Brain Volume: Adjusted mean for each treatment group, difference with Placebo, 95% confidence interval and p-value at each time point were based on an MMRM model, with change from baseline in MRI region as dependent variable and with fixed effects of treatment group, time (categorical), treatment group-by-time interaction, baseline for MRI region, baseline MRI region by time interaction, baseline Color Trails 2 test (\<=170 or \>170 seconds) and region.p-value: 0.735795% CI: [-3.506, 2.478]MMRM
Comparison: Midbrain Volume: Adjusted mean for each treatment group, difference with Placebo, 95% confidence interval and p-value at each time point were based on an MMRM model, with change from baseline in MRI region as dependent variable and with fixed effects of treatment group, time (categorical), treatment group-by-time interaction, baseline for MRI region, baseline MRI region by time interaction, baseline Color Trails 2 test (\<=170 or \>170 seconds) and region.p-value: 0.643995% CI: [-0.023, 0.014]MMRM
Comparison: Pons Volume: Adjusted mean for each treatment group, difference with Placebo, 95% confidence interval and p-value at each time point were based on an MMRM model, with change from baseline in MRI region as dependent variable and with fixed effects of treatment group, time (categorical), treatment group-by-time interaction, baseline for MRI region, baseline MRI region by time interaction, baseline Color Trails 2 test (\<=170 or \>170 seconds) and region.p-value: 0.986495% CI: [-0.039, 0.04]MMRM
Comparison: Cerebellar Peduncle Volume: Adjusted mean for each treatment group, difference with Placebo, 95% confidence interval and p-value at each time point were based on an MMRM model, with change from baseline in MRI region as dependent variable and with fixed effects of treatment group, time (categorical), treatment group-by-time interaction, baseline for MRI region, baseline MRI region by time interaction, baseline Color Trails 2 test (\<=170 or \>170 seconds) and region.p-value: 0.752995% CI: [-0.004, 0.006]MMRM
Comparison: Third Ventricle Volume: Adjusted mean for each treatment group, difference with Placebo, 95% confidence interval and p-value at each time point were based on an MMRM model, with change from baseline in MRI region as dependent variable and with fixed effects of treatment group, time (categorical), treatment group-by-time interaction, baseline for MRI region, baseline MRI region by time interaction, baseline Color Trails 2 test (\<=170 or \>170 seconds) and region.p-value: 0.68595% CI: [-0.025, 0.038]MMRM
Comparison: Frontal Lobe Volume: Adjusted mean for each treatment group, difference with Placebo, 95% confidence interval and p-value at each time point were based on an MMRM model, with change from baseline in MRI region as dependent variable and with fixed effects of treatment group, time (categorical), treatment group-by-time interaction, baseline for MRI region, baseline MRI region by time interaction, baseline Color Trails 2 test (\<=170 or \>170 seconds) and region.p-value: 0.995% CI: [-0.68, 0.598]MMRM
Secondary

Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Scale Score

The CGI-C scale measures the change in the patient's clinical status from a specific point in time. Using a 7-point scale, ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), with a score of 4 indicating no change.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: ITT population included randomized participants who had received at least 1 dose of blinded study treatment (BIIB092 or Placebo). 'Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies total number of participants analyzed in this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (PC Period)Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Scale Score5.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
BIIB092 2000 mg (PC Period)Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Scale Score5.2 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Comparison: Adjusted mean for each treatment group, difference with Placebo, 95% confidence interval and p-value at each time point were based on an MMRM model, with CGI-C as dependent variable and with fixed effects of treatment group, time (categorical), treatment group-by-time interaction, baseline CGI-S, baseline CGI-S by time interaction, baseline Color Trails 2 test (\<=170 or \>170 seconds) and region.p-value: 0.774395% CI: [-0.2, 0.1]MMRM
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Antibodies (Anti-BIIB092) Positive Results in Serum

Time frame: Up to Week 48

Population: ADA population - subset of the safety population with at least one evaluable post-baseline evaluable ADA samples.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo (PC Period)Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Antibodies (Anti-BIIB092) Positive Results in Serum7 Participants
BIIB092 2000 mg (PC Period)Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Antibodies (Anti-BIIB092) Positive Results in Serum0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 28, 2026