Skip to content

Is There a Digital Divide in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)?

Is There a Digital Divide in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)?

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03067779
Acronym
eCRIC
Enrollment
580
Registered
2017-03-01
Start date
2017-06-26
Completion date
2018-07-30
Last updated
2018-10-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Kidney Disease

Brief summary

This study is looking to improve the safety of patients with chronic kidney disease via education provided on a mobile tablet. This study will additionally examine if electronic tools, such as mobile tablets, can help.

Detailed description

Individuals with CKD are at risk for adverse safety events, yet little is known regarding the utility of health information technology (IT) educational tools to reduce these events. The results of this project will be invaluable in gaining a better understanding of the limitations and potential for use of a patient-centered mHealth patient safety educational intervention in high-risk individuals with CKD. The study will evaluate the perceived eHealth literacy of patients with CKD and its relation to medication errors in the CRIC cohort. The hypothesis is that a novel mHealth-based patient safety curriculum designed to address a wide-range of e-literacy will be effective in attenuating the identified Digital Divide adversely affecting many CKD patients, and will reduce adverse safety events common in this population. Study Aims: 1. Examine the association between surveyed perceived e-literacy and medication errors in individuals with CKD Hypothesis 1: Medication error rates will be higher among CRIC participants with low eHealth literacy. 2. Assess the acceptance and feasibility of a novel mHealth-based patient safety curriculum to improve patient safety risk knowledge among individuals with CKD and determine its efficacy in increasing patient safety risk awareness. Hypothesis 2a: A low literacy mHealth patient safety curriculum will improve patient safety risk awareness among high risk individuals with CKD. Hypothesis 2b: Medication error rates will be higher among CRIC participants with low patient safety risk awareness.

Interventions

The curriculum in the mHealth tool was derived in consultation with patient safety, informatics and adult educational curricula experts, and is comprised of clinical vignettes describing common patient safety themes in CKD and includes a pre- and post-test knowledge assessment. Topics of emphasis included NSAID risk awareness, hypoglycemia awareness, avoidance of volume depletion when ill (Sick Day Protocol) and avoidance of contrast-induced nephropathy.

Sponsors

University of Pennsylvania
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Maryland
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Illinois at Chicago
CollaboratorOTHER
Johns Hopkins University
CollaboratorOTHER
Duke University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 79 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Enrolled in Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study.

Exclusion criteria

* Not enrolled in Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Medication Errors10 minuteseHealth Literacy questionnaire and how that relates to medication errors
e-literacy questionnaire10 minuteseHEALS portion of the questionnaire will be used to determine eHealth literacy and e-literacy

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Safety Risk20 minutesmHealth tool and how that relates to patient safety risk

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026